However different we may be, there is far more that unites us than divides us. We share a common future. And we are here to find common ground so that we may help bring new dignity and respect to women and girls all over the world - and in so doing, bring new strength and stability to families as well.
Hillary Clinton “Women’s Rights Are Human Rights” Speech Given in Bejing , 5 Sept. 1995
http://www.famousquotes.me.uk/speeches/Hillary-Clinton/ During her husband’s administration, Hillary Clinton approached foreign policy problems in an unorthodox way---as a matter concerning people and not global economies. In Northern Ireland, she brought together the women, who had traditionally been left out of peace negotiations, a bold move and an effective one given the importance of women in Irish culture.
http://www.independent.ie/national-news/hume-and-trimble-clash-over-clintons-peace-role-1311181.htmlAccording to Clinton:
"I remember a meeting that I pulled together in Belfast, in the town hall there, bringing together for the first time Catholics and Protestants from both traditions, having them sitting a room where they had never been before with each other because they don't go to school together, they don't live together; and it was only in large measure because I really asked them to come that they were there."
Mary Fox, the wife of a former IRA prisoner and one of the seven women at the meeting, said she had been there on behalf of the Footprints community centre.
"It was quite a political change for the women's sector after the visit of Hillary Clinton," she said.
According to John Hume, winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, Clinton’s contribution paid off:
"I can state from first-hand experience that she played a positive role for over a decade in helping to bring peace to Northern Ireland. She visited Northern Ireland, met with very many people and gave very decisive support to the peace process.
"In private she made countless calls and contacts, speaking to leaders and opinion makers on all sides, urging them to keep moving forward."
George Mitchell told Katie Couric
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/03/10/eveningnews/main3923206.shtml She was helpful and supportive, very much involved in the issues, knew all of the delegates. She accompanied President Clinton on each visit he made to Northern Ireland, made several visits of her own. Her greatest focus was on encouraging women in Northern Ireland to get in and stay in the political process, the peace process. And I have said publicly many times and wrote in my book, the role of women in the peace process in Northern Ireland was significant. It did make a difference in the process, so as I said I think it was a helpful and supportive role.
In a New York Times interview in 1997, Clinton expressed this opinion about the ongoing negotiations in Northern Ireland:
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D06E7DF1730F932A35752C1A961958260&scp=7&sq=Hillary+Clinton+Northern+Ireland+peace&st=nyt ''When people want peace,'' she said, ''it is the obligation of political leaders to find the common ground where it can thrive. That requires compromise and reconciliation.''
If anyone within the Bush administration had possessed this attitude, we would not have been at war these last six years, because the Iraqi people have been begging for peace. No one wins in a civil war. Women, who seldom participate in the fighting but who suffer the most from the deprivations of war---hunger, disease, poverty, loss of loved ones---have been left out of the negotiations for too long. The same goes for workers—most peace negotiations are conducted between the elite members of the two rival factions, people who will prosper no matter what happens.
It might be time for us to entrust U.S. foreign policy to someone who understands that it takes a village to raise a child, because the corollary is if the village is under attack, the child is the first one who suffers. And who wants to see a child die from hunger, illness or violence?