Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What I wanted to hear --Obama "I am calling for the start of an immediate withdrawal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:47 AM
Original message
What I wanted to hear --Obama "I am calling for the start of an immediate withdrawal
Edited on Mon Dec-01-08 11:48 AM by Laura PackYourBags
from Iraq."

To me, his response - "16 mos, combat only" was entirely too luke warm.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, it was only what he had been saying on the campaign trail for months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. but he did, used to say, (paraphrasing) that on Jan 21 I will instruct
my team to get a plan to get out.

He's lost that urgency and it makes me very sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. making a plan to get out
is not pulling out in a day. Its making a plan for withdrawal that doesn't cost any more lives than necessary. It sounds like this is exactly what he's doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. winner.
i have a nephew there on his 3rd tour, i'd like him to make it home in one piece.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. Maybe getting Gates on board in this round started the ball rolling
earlier than it would have with someone else.

I'm sure even though the
defense department saw this coming they were doing as little as possible
to really institute a plan with any conviction.

I saw keeping Gates as a twofer for Obama, the other was to help with
the reform and weeding out of the department of old neo-cons.
That department is still scary considering all the nuke problems they've had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. I don't understand DUers hatred of Gates.

A lot of people claim he supported this Occupation, but nobody has ever shown me a quote from the man saying he supported it. He *has* been extremly critical of the way the Occupation was launched. He openly advocated direct negotiations with Iran years before the Occupation. Before becoming Secretary of Defense he was on the Iraq Study Group which concluded we should either (a) get out of Iraq sooner rather than later or (b) bring Iran and Syria into Iraqi negotiations.

He has never claimed to be a Democrat or a Republican. But he certainly sounds more progressive than neocon to me.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. I didn't know that.
Interesting points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Gates has Iran Contra ties and implications of major improprieties
From Democracy Now:



Melvin Goodman:
Bob Gates, over the period of the 1980s, as a deputy for Intelligence and then as a deputy to CIA director Bill Casey, was politicizing intelligence. He was spinning intelligence on all of the major issues of the day, on the Soviet Union, on Central America, on the Middle East, on Southwest Asia. And I thought this record, this charge, should be presented before the Senate Intelligence Committee.

I think also it’s important that Bob Gates is a graduate of the Iran-Contra class of 1986. And the reason why he had to withdraw his nomination in 1987 was simply because the majority of the members of the Senate Intelligence Committee, when Ronald Reagan nominated Gates as CIA director, did not believe Gates’s pleas that he knew nothing about Iran-Contra and this was happening around him, but he wasn’t part of it.

And, of course, in 1991, he attracted 31 negative votes, more than all of the votes against all of the CIA directors in history going back to 1947. So I think the committee believed that he was spinning the intelligence, and there was this great controversy, but the Republicans held the line. They made this a loyalty test to President George Bush, and so he was confirmed. But 31 negative votes was very significant.

Melvin Goodman, former CIA and State Department analyst. He is a senior fellow at the Center for International Policy and director of the Center’s National Security Project. From 1966-1986 he was a senior CIA soviet analyst. In 1991 he was one of three former CIA officials to testify before the Senate against the nomination of Robert Gates as director of central intelligence. Goodman is co-author of the book, “Bush League Diplomacy: How the Neoconservatives are Putting the World at Risk.”


>>>>>snip


Melvin Goodman, former CIA and State Department analyst. He is a senior fellow at the Center for International Policy and director of the Center’s National Security Project. From 1966-1986 he was a senior CIA soviet analyst. In 1991 he was one of three former CIA officials to testify before the Senate against the nomination of Robert Gates as director of central intelligence. Goodman is co-author of the book, “Bush League Diplomacy: How the Neoconservatives are Putting the World at Risk.”


The thing is I don't trust this bastard but I trust the Defense Department even less right now.
Gates is a follower and not a leader and I'm sure Obama and his crew are well aware
of his background. Also we know now that the Gassing of the Kurds could have been stopped.

Ugly business all around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Independant Counsel

The same Independant Counsel who nailed Poindexter, North and Weinberger cleared Gates of all wrongdoing.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. I said his involvement was tainted
I will accept him as SOD for now, still don't trust him considering his
work with the CIA during the Reagan years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I totally understand there needs to be a plan. It's that there was
absolutely no urgency or immediacy to it - the way he used to speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. I think it was as hot as he could have given at this time.
Considering.....

But most will read into it what they will.....
Which equated to being as careful getting out as were careless getting in.

In otherwords, He said again today what he has said all along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I know and I agree about responsible pullout - there was just no
urgency in his voice at all. Not like there used to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I think that the urgency is there......
but at this time, he has to wait....just like the rest of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Hope you are right - because since the primaries ended - 56
US soldiers have died.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. There is little that Obama can do about that......
as you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. The campaign is over
Maybe you need to get used to that. There will be no more fiery speeches from Obama now that he is president. His plan regarding Iraq is still the same, he just isn't saying it in front of 100,000 supporters with rick music playing in the background.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Yep. Just like the soldier I met on a plane a couple months ago
said, none of us listen to any politicians because they all lie. I hope the families of the 56 soldiers who have died since
the primaries ended can, as you say, "get used to that."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Name one concrete thing that Obama could have done since the election
to have saved the lives of those 56 soldiers.

He isn't president yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atimetocome Donating Member (236 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. Get used to the lack of fiery speeches
Like I said, the plan is the same. You are sad because Obama doesn't seem as urgent as he did during the campaign. You need to get used to the fact the campaign is over. Fiery talk means nothing at this point.

I never said get used to Obama not making good on his promises because I believe he will make good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. "You need to" "You are" "Get used to.." Yikes ! Who appointed
you in charge of telling me what to think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
6. An Embassy requires troops
And there is absolutely no reason we shouldn't have Embassies around the world, just like every other country does. I hope the monstrosity that was built is reduced significantly, but there will still be a need for troops at it, just like there is at every embassy. I also don't think we need a training mission, but we'll see if he brings in troops from the region and makes it more international. But a responsible drawdown is the same thing Murtha planned, so it's the best anyone should have hoped for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
14. Immediate withdrawal would be irresponsible and could actually cost troop lives in the process,
At least thats what I've heard from every single military minded expert on the topic. You can't just go yanking thousands and thousands of troops out without total chaos and anarchy ensuing in the middle of it all. Get real.

You are missing the key difference here. The mission he said that he is giving to the Sec of Defense is a mission where a responsible withdrawal and end to the war is top priority. That mission has never been given before. The mission before was basically to hold the stalemate until Bush figures out what to do next (which never happened and never would have happened).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. No, you have missed my point. Did I say anything about a
preciptous withdrawal - no!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. No, you have missed my point. Did I say anything about a
preciptous withdrawal - no!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaPera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #14
36. What "military minded expert"? They are ALL paid by networks & get their talking points from the
Edited on Mon Dec-01-08 08:34 PM by LaPera
Pentagon and most "military experts" like Carferty (NBC) work for the same corporations whose profits depend on keeping the war and troops in Iraq as long as possible....I've heard many retired military who are not on payrolls or used by the Pentagon as spokespersons say the opposite....What's going to happen is going to happen whether we live in a couple of month's (which they can do in) or five years from now...we are just prolonging it for profits because we listen to paid "military minded expert" assholes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. Wes Clark, Jim Webb, John Kerry, Chuck Hagel.
Need more?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atimetocome Donating Member (236 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
15. and that was followed by a .....But......
paraphrase--I will listen to the commanders on the ground.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Which as been the case, even when Obama was running.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atimetocome Donating Member (236 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Yes, you are right. But it does have a familiar ring to it--for several years
now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Speculation of the future is fine.
I'm going with "We shall see".

I've been waiting for some time now....so patience for me is the best reasonable and realistic option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
26. I think that's exactly what he will do...but quietly.
The campaign is over. No need to shout about what he will do. The time has come for him to do it, and that's what he will do. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
camera obscura Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
27. I'm sure Bush would honor that :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FriendlyReminder Donating Member (174 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
32. Let's hope that once he gets into office, he can really start doing what he promised
during the election season. It will be a "breath of fresh air" to see a President do what they actually said they were going to do! I can't wait.....hurry......let's get on with it already!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
33. The Iraqi government has said by the end of 2011, I assume Obama will comply with their wishes
No it's not the same as literally lining up the humvees and driving out as some people want, but 2011 is a drop in the bucket compared to 100 more years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Well thank god for the Iraqi government who is kicking us the hell out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
38. This is the position he has taken for the last two years.
So there is no surprise there. I guess most people would like to see that happen quicker, but nobody in the political and military world have been calling for an immediate and complete withdrawal.

Kerry/Feingold calls for all combat troops in one year (and it never passed the Senate by far). The Out of Iraq caucus calls for withdrawal in 6 months.

What is important is how soon they start, and Obama has said he would direct the SecDef to do that immediately after he takes office, and what will be the residual forces. This is where there is debate as some people would want to leave at least 60,000 troops and other a much smaller numbers, in the order of a few thousand. This is probably what will need to be looked at seriously during the next few weeks and months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC