Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I though Hawaii was part of the US

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 08:51 AM
Original message
I though Hawaii was part of the US
All this talk on Obama not being a natural born citizen where is this coming from and who is keeping this story alive.I understand that its even reached the US Supreme Court. Like we need them to get into the Presidential election AGAIN!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. *sigh*
it's coming from the wingnuttiest of the wingnuts.s WorldNut Daily seems to be the central hub. And the SC will NOT grant cert. It's absolutely absurd to buy into this crap. There is NOTHING to worry about on this fromt.

Let it go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. It is coming from sore losers who can't admit they were defeated
in the election.

But most repukes don't think Hawaii is America. They use to think the same thing about Alaska until the idiot turkey killing Sarah came along. Repukes will quickly contradict themselves for convenience sake. They now agree that Panama is part of the US too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. And yet McCain was born in Panama and they have no problem with that.
News Flash! Panama is a foreign country. It wasn't even a US possession, let alone a territory. We were there by treaty, that was it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. But he was born on the military base which makes it our property
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmoney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. no, born off base in Panama, not in the Canal Zone
Although his parents were stationed there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. The point is he was born of American parents - makes him American,
no matter where you're born.

Also, if you have ONE American parent, you are American, no matter where you are born.

Obama's mother was American. End of discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Not "End of discussion"
"No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States."

McCain is not old enough to have been born before the Adoption of this Constitution.

Being born in Panama, he is not a "...natural born Citizen,..." McCain is a Naturalized citizen by virtue of having American parents, even though he was born in a foreign country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. "Natural born" does not mean you have to be born on American soil
You are natural born if you have American parents. There are only two types of citizenship - natural born and naturalized. If your theory was correct then McCain is not a citizen. The U.S. Senate, including Obama, unanimously rejected that theory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. McCain did not have to be naturalized
Only people who were once aliens can be naturalized.

McCain was born a citizen because he was born in the Canal Zone and the statutory law provides that people born in the Canal Zone of American parents were at the time McCain was born, citizens.

Obama was born in the U.S. and is therefore a natural born citizen, like all the rest of us born in the U.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. Not necessarily what "natural-born" means. It USED to mean "on American soil", IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. Not according to the United States Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
28. Some people say that McCain's mother went into premature labor in a restaurant...
that was not on the base and he was born amids wok pots and steaming pots of rice
There was a cover up involved. Some say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. I thought that he was born in Kansas. No?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mgc1961 Donating Member (874 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
7. My little Hawaii-born brother is going to be disappointed to learn...
...that he's not an American.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. My two adult kids are also going to be a bit surprised. What would we ever do without wingnuts...
... for entertainment?

Hekate


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
8. Welcome to America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
9. There are conflicting arguments they raise
the most bizarre being that Obama's mother gave birth to him in Kenya. This ridiculous assertion, which assumes this couple flees TO a country that was still a British protectorate but was under a state of emergency due to a major rebellion for independence that was ongoing (where the independence finally occurred in 1963, 2 years after Obama was born when Kenyatta and his party took over the gov't), underscores the twisted thought-process that they are suffering through. To reconcile this nonsense, these nutjobs have concocted a theory that a vast left-wing conspiracy arose to ensure that records were doctored to show his birth in Hawai'i instead (which itself was a place undergoing a major transformation from territory to state, just 2 years before Obama was born, but was at least stable). They insist that the Hawai'ian State Health department, the hospital, and the major newspapers in print at the time in 1961, were all in on the subterfuge - back in 1961 - in preparation for the one who would become the President in 2009. :eyes: They also insist that the mother can throw away (renounce) her child's U.S. citizenship... just like that. They then weave in Indonesia's citizenship laws in effect at the time when he lived there (where the child of a male citizen would become one in a mixed marriage - although much of Indonesia's citizenship laws were addressing the ethnic Chinese population and Obama was not a blood relative but adopted, and was not born in Indonesia). Yet the contradictions and pretzel twists to make some argument go on and on.

Meanwhile, they had ignored McKKKlan's well-known birth in Panama (as a child of an Admiral and mother who was a U.S. citizen military wife stationed there) until recently, when they couldn't hold back from the hypocracy anymore.

Obama, by no fault of his own, is truly a worldly child - one with experience living among a number of cultures thanks to his jet-setting mother, and I expect this very much reflects on how he is and how he may govern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
10. They're claiming he was born in Kenya.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
11. Africa' is teh country of his birthplace' and it's economy's is in taters.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistler162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
13. Nope.... it is a group of islands in the middle of the Pacific Ocean
GEEEZ.... don't you know anything!x( ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
14. IF I CAINT GIT THERE IN MY TRUCK, ITS A GODDAM FORIN COUNTRY!!!111!!!!!

OF COURSE MY TRUCKS IN PRETY BAD SHAPE RITE NOW SO THAT MEANS MOST OF THE WORLD OUTSIDE OF THIS TRALER PARK IS FORIN!!!111!11
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatGund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 01:41 PM
Original message
Basically....
You have three groups of wingnuts. All tend to cross-breed to produce mutant spawn, but they are:

1) The people who believe that Obama was really born in Kenya, (Corsi, World Net Daily, Berg, a few others.)

2) The people who believe he was born in Hawaii, but lost his citizenship due to his mother marrying Lolo Soetoro and supposedly losing both her citizen and Obama's as a result. (Berg, "Judah Benjamin", Keyes, etc.)

3) The people that believe he was born in Hawaii, but because his father was not a US citizen, and since he had Kenyan citizenship as result, he may be a citizen, but not a "Natural Born Citizen" as per the Constitution. ("Judah Benjamin", Donofrio, etc.)

There's also a couple of other players, like anti-semite Andy Martin's claim that the "real" birth certificate will show his "real" father was Frank Marshall Davis, and others claiming his real father is Malcolm X.

Berg (Pennsylvania), Donofrio (New Jersey), and Wrotnowski (Connecticut) have all appealed their cases to the Supreme Court after being dismissed in the lower courts. Souter is handling Berg's, Thomas is handling Donofrio's, Ginsberg is handing Wrotnowski's

Martin is appealing his Hawaii case,

Cases in Ohio, Washington, Virginia are dead,

Cases in California (2), Georgia, North Carolinia, New York, and Texas are still active.

In most cases, they are "cookie cutter" clones of Berg's original lawsuit. (Alan Keyes lawsuit is a cookie cutter clone) Donofrio is the only one arguing the "natural born citizen" angle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaJudy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
19. Ferheavensake, RW: get over it!
Edited on Thu Nov-27-08 05:05 PM by FloridaJudy
If I can survive eight years of America's Dumbest White Boy as President, you can survive having a smart black man in that position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
15. You can blame Clarence Thomas for SCOTUS hearing anything about this
Another justice declined to even consider to have a hearing about having a hearing on the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Yup, Slappy is still pissed at Biden over his confirmation hearing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. its not getting a "hearing"
Its being considered in conference. Around 7000 or so cert petitions are filed each year and cert is granted in less than 100 cases. Most cert petitions never get past the "cert pool" -- the petitions are doled out to the clerks of various justices who then make a recommendation as to whether the case should be discussed in conference. Even among the cases that are recommended for discussion, cert is denied in the vast majority of instances.

The situation at hand is a bit more muddled. No cert petition has been filed -- just a request for a stay pending the filing of a cert petition. That stay request was submitted to souter (I believe) and he turned it down. Under the SCOTUS rules, the petitioner could then go to another justice and make a new request, which is what happened. In theory, Thomas could've granted the request unilaterally. The fact that he didn't but did refer the matter to conference suggests that he is recommending that the request for stay be treated as and resolved as the cert petition itself. A justice may on occasion refer to conference a petition he/she doesn't believe should be granted but believes warrants discussion. In any event, its not unlikely that had the case come to the cert pool that the clerk assigned it might have, in an abundance of caution, directed it to conference where the justices could kill it themselves.

In other words, this is almost certainly much ado about nothing.

Disclosure: the information provided is not based on first hand experience, but is based on a conversation I had with a recent SCOTUS clerk that I know at another law firm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatGund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. And it's possible.....
....that with all the other cookie-cutter Berg-clone cases coming to it, the SCOTUS is trying to do a pre-emptive strike to fail those as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #21
33. I guess you've seen...

Where they want to not only challenge his election, but want to challenge every official act he makes after he is sworn in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatGund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #33
36. Yep...
The apply named "Gary Kreep", who made a name for himself originally defending birth control clinic arsonists.

I suspect if he goes with that tactic, he's going to eventually get dinged as a "vexious litigator"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Thank you for clearing the air, onenote
I just found it ironic that it was Thomas who decided to run with this ball.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatGund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. The funny thing??
Thomas has put himself in a lose-lose situation.

The Cult of the COLB are so convinced that with Thomas putting it to a ROUTINE PROCEDURAL CONFERENCE, the fix is in because he's on their side and has an ax to grind.

Which means if and when it's dismissed from conference, (less than 1% of writ of cents are granted), the same people who claim he's on their side and the fix is in, will blame the dismissal on his race.

Lose-lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #15
35. Every other nutjob is going to appeal his dismissals all the way up anyway

So, why not at least give every other court a "cert. denied" to cite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
29. I thought the complaint was not where he was born, but that his father was a Kenyon citizen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gauguin57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. It's both ... because of immigration law that was in effect at the time Obama was born.
Edited on Thu Nov-27-08 11:05 PM by gauguin57
Here's what the Freepers are hanging their hopes on...

If Obama HAD been born outside the U.S., with an 18-year-old American mom and a Kenyan dad ... he may have had problems. His Mom had not lived in the U.S. for at least five years after the age of 16 by the time Obama was born (see immigration law below). But since we all know Obama WAS born in Hawaii, it's a moot point. Freepers think he was born in Kenya because some lameass claims to have a tape of an African grandmother (stepgrandmother? not sure) stating she was present at Obama's birth ... in Kenya. Because of the following immigration law, dealing with the number of years of residence of the one American parent, Freepers are saying Obama is not a "natural-born citizen" -- though what they fail to mention is that this piece of immigration law ONLY APPLIED TO THOSE BORN OUTSIDE THE COUNTRY.

U.S. Immigration law that applied from December 24, 1952 to November 13, 1986 (applying to children of U.S. citizens born outside the country):

"If, at the time of your birth, both your parents were U.S. citizens and at least one had a prior residence in the United States, you automatically acquired U.S. citizenship with no conditions for retaining it.

"If only one parent was a U.S. citizen at the time of your birth, that parent must have resided in the United States for at least ten years, at least five of which had to be after the age of 16. There are no conditions placed on retaining this type of citizenship. If your one U.S. citizen parent is your father and you were born outside of marriage, the same rules apply if your father legally legitimated you before your 21st birthday and you were unmarried at the time. If legitimation occurred after November 14, 1986, your father must have established paternity prior to your 18th birthday, either by acknowledgment or by court order, and must have stated in writing that he would support you financially until your 18th birthday."

Wingers are also throwing into the mix the fact that Obama Sr. had a tribal marriage in Kenya before he married Ann Dunham in the U.S. ... so was their marriage binding, or not? They seem to think that has some bearing on the situtation, but I don't really get that part.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. Otherwise known as the "send your pregnant teen daughter to a foreign convent" act

The point was that if you sent your pregnant daughter to a convent in France, then the child would not be a US citizen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #30
34. That last part....

In order to get the last part, you have to get that some of these folks have legal ideas that can only be described as medieval. At one point, there was a camp which asserted if Barack was "illegitimate" if his parents weren't married, then he couldn't qualify to be president either. So in conjunction with "where is his birth certificate", they wanted the marriage certificate of Barack Sr. and Stanley Ann.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gauguin57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
31. Here's info from the Constitution, and from the Naturalization Act of 1790.
Here's who can be prexy, according to Article II of the Constitution:

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

The pertinent passage from the Naturalization Act of 1790:

The Act also establishes the United States citizenship of children of citizens, born abroad, without the need for naturalization: "The children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC