Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This is certainly change.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BobRossi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:16 PM
Original message
This is certainly change.
Okay, I wasn't even going to vote in the presidential election this year until I was convinced that Barack was the right person. I was really taken in by all that "change" rhetoric.
Now that he has re-instated the Clinton cabinet he is now continuing shrub's tax policy.

I think I should have stayed with my gut feelings.

"WASHINGTON (Reuters) – President-elect Barack Obama may consider delaying a campaign promise - to roll back tax cuts on high-income Americans - as part of his economic recovery strategy, two aides said on Sunday.

David Axelrod, the Obama campaign strategist who was chosen to be a senior White House adviser, was asked if the tax cuts could be allowed to expire on schedule after tax year 2010 rather than being rolled back by legislation earlier. "Those considerations will be made," he said on "Fox News Sunday."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20081123/pl_nm/us_usa_obama_taxes_5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Contact your precinct. Maybe you can get your vote cancelled. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Lol
that was funny! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Rofl.....nice!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. lol. beautiful.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
44. A stupid reply that really doesn't address a real concern.
Go ahead and keep ignoring what is really going on around you, keep that blind faith going.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #44
59. The OP doesn't address any real concerns, my dear. It seems
a bit premature to me to start whining about the man; he hasn't even taken office. But join the chorus, as I'm quite sure you will, being kinda grouchy that way.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. how dare you have an independent opinion and challege the conventional wisdom : - ) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobRossi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. What was I thinking?
I forgot for a moment where I was posting. I'll drink some Kool-Aid and be better in no time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. You had reservations about voting for him...the two issues you
listed have done it for you...and the people who choose to support the President Elect until at least January 20th! are drinking kool-aid? As soon as I hear that term, I know who and what I'm dealing with. I'm sure you did forget where you were posting!

Sounds to me like your goal is to start a dissension party here.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #16
46. No maybe some voter remorse after seeing what was promised being reneged on.
And, dissent is a good thing. It is why we are called the United States of America and not the American Colony of Great Britain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #46
53. What has he reneged on?
Please, do tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #46
60. Yeah, didn't think so.
He's reneged on NOTHING to date.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #46
61. I thought you left on friday? Done for good with Obama? Wanted
your money back? Only voted for him for Kerry or some reason like that? Why are you still hanging around? You're done remember? Nothing good could come out of you being here since your're done already? Don't you have something else to do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. Tell you what. You criticize all you want, but don't call those who support him koolaid drinkers.
Or do you fail to see the irony of your own comments?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
26. yes, yes. everyone who disagrees with you is just a mindless
Edited on Sun Nov-23-08 01:09 PM by cali
kool-aid drinker. How dare us peons challenge superior little you?

Your choice. Too bad you chose not to inform yourself. The info was right there. Obama always spoke of letting the bush tax cuts expire. He made no committment to try and repeal them via legislation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
45. Yeah! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think you have stayed with your gut feelings. He hasn't been
given the oath of office yet and you're already done? Not giving him much of a chance huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gblady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. as stated....
in another thread on this subject....

letting it expire in 2010 is what Barack said he would do
over and over and over in his stump speeches...

absolutely no change in plans here...
people just don't seem to listen to what he has said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. It sounds like a smart economical and political move
No records of dems raising taxes and not having raising taxes slow the economy further. My understanding is a slow economy loses more money based on reduced tax revenue than a years worth of increased taxes on those making greater than 250,000 per year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ben_meyers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. This isn't from Obama himself, it's from his "aides"
and it's a very clever ploy to get the greedy rich bastards to dig up their ill gotten gains from the backyard and out from under their mattresses and invest it in the stock market. This will have the effect of continuing the rally started Friday. Then when it's to late and these bloodsuckers have made their undeserved profits.. tax the hell out of them!

Pure genius.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shoelace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. and to think, you could have voted for McCain/Palin!
now that would have been real change eh?lol.:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobRossi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Or a Progressive Liberal
Gee what a concept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
28. bwahahaha. yeah, you could have voted for Cynthia McKinney
or Ralph the repuke tool. Wow. What integrity you have.

Thanks for the laugh.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kajsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
30. Right!

And what were his/her chances of actually winning
the Presidential election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
12. I thought during the campaign, he said he'd let them expire. I didn't hear him say,
"as soon as I take office, those rich bastards are going to start paying." I think his first priority is to make sure people are working.. Working people pay taxes and support the govt. He's going to have to spend in order for new business to start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
13. its good to change your stances on issues when everything around you continues to collapse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
14. Well you should piss yourself with impotent anger because of something
the media probably reported incorrectly! That's how it's done, brother!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
15. He is simply going to let the Bush tax cuts expire which he
promised to do over and over again. It will happen in 2010. I see the MSM is already trying to say Obama is not going to keep his promises but I thought people here who followed his campaign and speeches know better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
17. Ah yes, I am sure he ran on raising taxes just because of all the votes that would win him. We all
know how popular a message that is.

Clearly he wants to continue Shrub's policies.




:sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
18. It didn't take you long to blame the Clintons for shit that hasn't even happened yet.
Now that he has re-instated the Clinton cabinet he is now continuing shrub's tax policy


But to be fair, I'll mention that you're not only blaming the Clintons, but you're also blaming Obama. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kajsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
19. Focusing solely on what he's NOT doing,
versus what he is going to do?

"The main thing right now is to get this economic recovery package on the road, to get money in the pockets of the middle class, to get these projects going, to get America working again, and that's where we're going to be focused in January," Axelrod said.
Obama said on Saturday he was crafting an aggressive two-year stimulus plan to revive the economy, aiming to save 2.5 million jobs by January 2011 through projects including transportation infrastructure, school modernization and alternative energy.



It doesn't sound like anyone could measure up to your expectations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
20. If PE Obama's making this statement helps
calm wall street's anxiety--at least long enough for him to actually take office where he can actually do something--then I'm alright with it.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
21. MSM framing. Obama said he would let the tax cuts expire
Edited on Sun Nov-23-08 12:58 PM by Truth Hurts A Lot
He never promised to immediately increase their taxes. That's the way the media is framing it to sow division amongst some knee-jerk Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevinds13 Donating Member (176 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
24. It seemed to me
that just letting the Bush tax cuts expire in 2010 was his intention all along. If not, he would have had to introduce legislation, hope it got passed in both houses, and expended political capital just to do that. So the fact that this is news is pretty surprising to me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
25. "Now that he has re-instated the Clinton cabinet "
Edited on Sun Nov-23-08 01:06 PM by RetroLounge
That sentence alone proves you know nothing...

RL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kajsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. Touche, Retro!
Edited on Sun Nov-23-08 02:01 PM by Kajsa
I don't remember Bill Richardson in that cabinet, do you?

:pals:

Edit- He was- Nevermind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Nope...
But maybe there's a few Johnson or Carter appontees left somewhere.

I mean, there not exactly Clinton era...

:pals:

RL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. I do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kajsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. I stand corrected.

n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. He was Secretary of Energy under Clinton.
so much for your "touche". :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kajsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. I was wrong

and I promptly admit it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. Well god forbid we have people with experience, you know?
:pals:

RL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kajsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #41
48. Especially those who worked in an
administration that left us with a budget surplus!

:) :pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #48
56. Peace and Prosperity, who needs it?
:9

RL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #41
51. Yup - I always wonder what magic-pony-land are the fucktard haters gonna get non-rookies from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #51
57. Well, as long as they meet their criteria
black, gay, hispanic, female, non-clintonian, then they will not care about experience.

RL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
27. Zynx thinks you're wrong
Just because someone served in the Clinton Administration does not mean they are a hardcore Clinton loyalist. The fact is that most professional quality Democrats who can serve in Obama's Administration will have likely served in some position, appointed or not, in the Clinton Administration. Obama is not going to comb colleges and universities for a bunch of people who have simply warm and fuzzy theories. He wants people who have seen some real world activity. Not a whole bunch of hair-brained idealists. Some of those young idealists will cut their teeth in the lower echelons of the Obama administration and become major officials in the future either in Obama's second term if he has one or in the next Democratic administration.

That's how the system works.


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x7916247#7916271
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
29. have you fled?
I'd be embarassed to demonstrate that I paid so little attention that I didn't know what Obama said about the bush tax cuts.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
33. Another dummy that can't wait until the guy actually becomes president.
Why am I not surprised there are still stupid people on DU?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
34. And, he always said that he was going to let the Bush tax cuts on the rich expire.
I never thought, as someone that actually paid attention, that he was going to do anything different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
35. So what would your gut feeling of not voting accomplished?
Even if you were not impressed with Obama, often elections come down to a lesser of two evils. Surely you would not want McCain/Palin running this country -- would you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
39. BobR, a question for you.
You can just skip this over if you don't want to answer, but I just got finished writing a defense of the people of DU and their right to spout off when things bug 'em. So here's the question:

Can you give me some idea of what you wanted to see PE Obama do? Rolling back the tax break for the Monopoly Men is obviously one of 'em. What sort of cabinet did you want to see?

And here's a kind word for you, not meant to change your mind, but to perhaps lessen the anguish: the Clinton cabinet did a pretty good job in several areas, including competent economic management, government transparency, and extracting us from and avoiding nasty foreign entanglements (Bush the Smarter left Somalia as a problem for Clinton, and I was sure we were heading to one in the former Yugoslavia, but that one turned out okay).

If you ask me, Bill Clinton was the best Republican President we had in the 20th Century, and yes, I do think Obama is taking the same tack. I'm not elated about that either.

Thanks in advance for your comments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
42. "meet the new boss,-same as the old boss"
Or bosses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. LOL
No, really. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. Funny thing is I don't see it that way. And, I bet I have been through many more
Presidents than you have. Obama doesn't appear to be any different then the lot of them- at least that is what lessons from past history are telling me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #47
52. Funny thing is, I don't recall any president since FDR proposing what Obama did yesterday.
The cabinet is only a small, small part of what he's going to do. And don't pull that "I'm older so I know more than you do" bullshit. I'm 44, used to cover politics as a reporter, and will put my knowledge up against anyone's.

If the "old boss" is FDR, then I'm all for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
49. It's funny to see all of those who only pretended to support Obama...
They can't even wait until he takes office to declare him a failure.

:rofl:

You all fail fucking pathetically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. No kidding. They're coming out of the woodwork. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
54. Yeah what an ass that Obama, how dare he play chess and
look at the long term while we are sitting here playing checkers, waiting for our instant gratification. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
55. By not voting, you would have helped McCain Palin. Let Obama take office before you decide he
is no good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
58. STFU ...you are making people here mad.
Don't you know that you are supposed to lock step with the seemingly majority here?

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC