Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who will be the GOP nominee in 2012

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Politics_Guy25 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:49 AM
Original message
Poll question: Who will be the GOP nominee in 2012
Edited on Sun Nov-23-08 12:54 AM by RMP2008
Who do you think the GOP nominee will be in 2012 if you had to guess? At this point I'm thinking a battle royale between Romney and Huckabee (right wing versus pragmatic arm of the party) Both will be easy victories for President Obama. The lady who can see Russia from her house is done and finished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. WHile you still have the time, edit out Coleman and replace with Jindal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politics_Guy25 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Thanks Hnmnf-forgot about him-n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. Mittens, more than likely
The corporatist wing of the GOP is going to eventually win out over the religious reichers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
political_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. Huckabee because he's folksy, charismatic and dangerous.
He is everything that Bobby Jindal is not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. i'm trying to figure out who they have left
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. If this were post election in 2004, who would say Obama would be our nominee in 2008?
It's only guessing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
7. Rush Limbaugh nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Bone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
8. Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr. from Utah nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
704wipes Donating Member (966 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
9. Jeb, no doubt in my mind
Send McCain out this year and then they don't steal it for him. That was probably why the Rove team took over the campaign in the summer, to make sure McCain did not win. Now they are crashing the economy to a low that no one could bring back in four years and who knows what poison pills and time bombs they are leaving behind? Then in 2012 a lot of hoopla, PR and outright propaganda that another Bush Miracle is what we need, and Jeb is their boy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snake in the grass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. I highly doubt...
...that a Bush will ever be POTUS again. That name is equivalent to shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. i sure hope so...
the bush name is going to be political poison for quite some time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #9
25. LOL! No B*sh will ever be President again. Never.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
10. Try concentrating on 2008
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
camera obscura Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
11. I voted for Pawlenty
Palin is going to burn out too fast... I can't see Jindal passing the primary season, too much of the base that just wouldn't feel comfortable voting for a POC. Jeb Bush carries the tainted name. Crist would face a smear campaign that'd bring him down quick. Romney hasn't gained a lot of new fans. Huckabee is old news.

Unless something crazy happens between now and then, I think it'll be Pawlenty. He could take the most important primaries easy: he governs a state close to IA, "maverick" NHites will like the fact that he's not a creeper or a psycho fundie, old people in FL will be non-threatened by him. Of course SC will go to Huckabee or whoever the Southerner in the race is and NV will go to Romney.

Plus, he's a dorky white guy, the GOP's bread and butter, and the big namers will be too busy tearing each other apart to attack him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
12. The Huckster ...
If only because he doesnt seem to be easy to buy .... I doubt he wants anyone to buy his wife a new fur coat or anything like that ....

He will be the last one standing ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phredicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 01:33 AM
Response to Original message
13. The brain-deads love Sarah P., and the brain-deads are the core of
what's left of the Ghastly Old Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Undercurrent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
14. What a line up!
Another Bush, a whack job, a nutty preacher, a Mormon, a closet gay, a boring guy, a Jew, and an exorcist.

Of course there's nothing wrong with a Jewish or gay president, in fact it would be great of it were the right person, but I can't fathom the Repugs going there. At all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
15. I still think it will be Sarah
The jackass base still adores her and thinks she's a cure-all to their problems. They're completely ignorant of the fact that she has no credibility with anyone outside of the GOP die-hards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
18. I think Mitt will get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 04:12 AM
Response to Original message
19. Sarah Palin wins every pug poll by large margins.
I personally think it will be Palin/Jindal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
20. Jindal
I don't think Barracuda Sarah can hack it on the big stage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
21. Eric Cantor
R-VA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
22. Unless Obama scews up royally
It will not matter who the Republican nominee is. It will be a nomination given
for ceremonial purposes, sort of like Bob Dole in 1996, or Walter Mondale in 1984.
Therefore, I give it to none of the above. The only reason I don't say Palin is
that the Republicans don't want to embarrass themselves where no one will take their
next presidential nominee seriously (i.e. 2016). Otherwise, they'd pick her for
sheer entertainment value. I know political satirists would welcome the business, and
she'd probably get contributions from everyone from The Daily Show to The Freedom Toast
(OK, maybe not, but they'd certainly love the free material). The DNC would also appreciate
the diminished need for fundraising and expenditure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
23. I expect that Barack Obama will have 2 terms.
The Republicans are a depleted bunch right now. They have not been this sorry-looking in who knows how long, and if Obama's first term is as effective as I think it will be, the GOP nominee is going to be a perfunctory pick.

Romney has the bucks and the ambition but his faith and creepiness are off-putting. Consider the hefty leads he lost in both Iowa and New Hampshire last winter.

Huckabee has the snake-oil charm but he couldn't even polish off John McCain for the GOP nomination this time. He barely defeated Sam Brownback in the Iowa caucus.

I'm not seeing Sarah Palin running an effective campaign for the nomination from her remote outpost in the tundra. I also think Romney and Huckabee and likely others will tear her to bits in the early debates and further diminish the rationale for her nomination. She's not just uninformed, she's willfully ignorant, which is a more serious transgression against the idea of public service.

I think Thune holds onto his rising-star status in the Senate and Rob Portman goes for an Ohio statewide office of one sort or another, possibly Voinovich's seat.

IMO the Bush brand will be less palatable in 2010 and 2012 than it is now, and now it's pretty unpalatable. Bad news for Jeb.

Pawlenty and Jindal have no national profiles and questionable abilities to build one. I don't see Jindal anywhere near the Republican ticket in 2012. Pawlenty maybe, but to date there doesn't seem to be much of a constituency to support the idea.

At the moment anyway, it appears that the GOP nomination contest for 2012 may be an alley fight between Mike Huckabee and Mitt Romney. I set Huckabee as a slight favorite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
24. Obama can win against any of the people on that short list! So...
I don't really care who it is.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue_onyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
26. I week or two ago, I would've said Romney
but I voted for Huckabee. When Romney said that we should let the US auto companies go bankrupt, he said goodbye to winning his "home state" of Michigan, as well as Ohio, Indiana, and probably Pennsylvania (the rust belt is where his "strength" on the economy would worked). Huckabee will do well with the conservative base of the Republican party and he is fairly likable so he won't turn people off the way Palin did this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
27. Huckabee--I'm glad folks are paying attention. He has his own show
now and is very dangerous because he is a wolf in sheep's clothing. I'm as partisan as it gets, yet I found myself being able to listen to him (expecially when he tried to bond with people over the weight issue--which I also had at one point in my life). I thought we needed to watch him closely for 2008 but he wasn't ready for primetime then. In 4 years he will be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC