It's legit to question Hillary as SOS because of Bill's business dealings...

[Wetzelbill]

Here is why:

I think it's only fair to question Hillary's potential appointment and the troubles vetting Bill could bring, because, as I said fair is fair. It's not just the psycho obsession with all things Clinton or anything.

We all know that Bush was given considerable pain over the vetting of all of his family's business dealings including his own and his VP's as well.

Oh wait.... Nobody really gave Bush any hell over that stuff?

Uh well they, yeah...

:: cricketschirping ::

[mmonk]

1. Vetting is proper.

Why should anyone oppose it? It's best to make sure your paths are clear.

[Wetzelbill]

2. yeah but everybody is automatically making it sound like he's

done something sinister. Nobody ever automatically says that in the MSM about the Bushes or anybody else, always the Clintons.

[mmonk]

3. Yeah, which makes it even more important to do I guess.

Somebody out there will be ready to pounce.

[Sebastian Doyle]

4. Even more legit to question her because of her devotion to neocon fascist foreign policy

She was 100% in favor of everything Chimp, PNAC, and the paranoid Likud bastards wanted up to and including "Obliterating Iran", only toning down her rhetoric when she knew she couldn't campaign on that shit to a population fed up with Iraq.

But anyone believing she's really changed her mind about it, I've got some beachfront property in Arizona I'd like to sell you.

[Wetzelbill]

5. that's my biggest concern with her

I have real disagreements with her foreign policy ideas over the last 8 years.