Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dean responds to bloggers on Lieberman

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 06:30 PM
Original message
Dean responds to bloggers on Lieberman
Dean on Obama, Lieberman, and Us

John Aravosis: (In re: the Lieberman vote) what do recommend that we tell our readers . . . when so many issues that come up that Democrats cave time after time? They keep feeling like we're getting more Democrats and we're going to have even more Democrats to cave next time.

Dean: You know, we're going to find that out. This is the big test for us. Now we have a president. There's no excuse for voting for stuff that you don't think is in the best interest of the country anymore, for not standing up for what you believe. We have a president who is going to lead us and you all get to judge whether we're leading you in the right direction or not. I think for the most part we will....

One of the things that happens when you have a party that takes over the government after it's been out of power for a while is you cannot satisfy everybody at your end of the political spectrum all of the time.... And this is where I was talking about the restraint, is making the decision about what's really worth fighting for and having the big fight inside the party and what's not worth fighting for and you have to decide what that is. One of the things that will come up early inside the blogosphere is the issue of when to get out of Iraq.... Now we have, when Barack Obama takes office, are we going to get out in July of 2010, which is 18 months, or are we going to get out at the end of 2011 which is what Bush and the Iraqis have already agreed to.

I don't know what the right answer is. Do we want to go to the mat over an additional 18 months in Iraq? I don't know that either, but I do know that we want a strong president to deliver health care and renewable energy and i"m not sure we want to attack the president if that becomes and issue. SO you see what I was saying about tradeoffs. You have to make the decisions. We're never going to get anybody who is a hundred percent with us on every issue.... But the question is what are willing to go to war on with each other over and what are we going to say, ok, this is an important issue there's some disagreement, but we can't let this distract us from climate change or health insurance or whatever other issues are....

What I'm saying here is along comes Lieberman. He behaved very badly during the campaign and did some things that inside the club are unforgivable. So if you run and get a mandate for reconciliation is your first act to kick this guy out of the party? Well, people of my generation think yeah, damn right we should. But in this new spirit of reconciliation, which is why I think Barack Obama got elected by 66 percent of the under 35 vote, maybe if not (unintelligible) I'm very willing to give the benefit of the doubt to the Senators and to Barack Obama on that one. Do we want to have a big fight over what happens to Joe Lieberman? I don't think so. I think we want to have a big fight about whether we have a decent health insurance program or a renewable energy program.

Jane Hamsher: With all due respect Governor Dean, we were just told to go screw ourselves, that our concerns for Barack Obama and our concern about the war and everything else that we fought so hard for within the Democratic party is meaningless and that Joe being happy and giving in to his threats--and he did threaten Democrats in his press conference--is more important than we are. And so I don't think it was a matter of reconciliation. I think we were told to go Cheney ourselves.

Dean: I haven't seen the blogs about this because this just happened but I'm sure the sentiment online is one of outrage. But I would line up with Barack. I don't think you were told to go screw yourselves at all. I think he has got to now practice what he preaches during two years of campaigns if he wants to bring America together and as objectionable as Joe's behavior was, and frankly unprincipled, I don't think that this is the thing that should divide us. And I don't think it's about his votes for FISA or anything else. I think it's about what kind of a tone do we want to send. Do we want a purge as the first thing we do? I don't think so.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. ****BREAKING**** Dean says "...go screw yourselves..."
Developing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Great comment. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. And somehow, that is all some folks will hear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. It's not an either you accept it or believe you were screwed
People being angry is not a joke, and obviously the effort to claim that those of us who scream for accountability don't understand the big picture is not always accurate.

Schumer regrets not leading an Alito filibuster

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. Yeesh. Reminds me of why I stopped reading Firedoglake
Hamsher always defaults to the most inflammatory interpretation of an issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thank you Howard Dean...always the voice of reason!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Exactly.
I hope that it is enough to calm the Joe-centric.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. That's actually pretty frank for someone in our camp.
I think most of this stuff has been in the plans since before Obama won office. At least, I'd have my task list put together just in case anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wow.
"There's no excuse for voting for stuff that you don't think is in the best interest of the country anymore"

That is some statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I guess Lieberman keeping his chair was in the best interest of the country. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Guess so
but I'll be damned if I can figure that or accept that it was OK to vote for what was not good for the country just because we were a minority or a small majority or did not have a Democratic President.

My head hurts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. I hope Dean knows something more than what he is saying
because what he saying isn't very consoling right now.

It's like telling me to get over it when Bush stole the elections.
If Lieberman had made a public apology
on nationwide TV today, I would have felt better and then I would be over it, but he didn't.

Reid's statement I found more offending and aggrogant because offered no apology but could have
spoken for Lieberman saying he offered an apology to the caucus.

IS a public apology too much to ask for from Joe? I'm mean is it?
I don't think it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. I'm afraid with Joe's temperment he would use a public apology
as a chance to grandstand and be a martyr in the press. It would be a non-apology explanation of his non-partisan "high principles" cough, cough that he's been gassing on about for weeks now. The republicans would have a chance to make a statement defending him and we'd see an extension of Holy Joe's media narrative.

This "takes the needle off the record" and the song ends now. No more Holy Joe. That's my take anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. Did Obama ever say that Lieberman should retain his chair?
I thought he just said that he wanted Joe to caucus with DEMS.

Hell, his constituents expected that from him no matter what his standing.

I love Dean, but there seems to be an effort to paint anti-Lieberman DEMS as anti-Obama and anti-change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
13. I just love Dean, his
vision and his prescience.

Happy Birthday, yesterday, Gov Dr, 50 State Pioneer:party::kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
14. "Do we want to have a big fight over what happens to Joe Lieberman? I don't think so."
Spot. On. Howard.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Agreed.
Plus breaking GOP filabusters in the future will be more important than exacting revenge on Joe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
17. Get over it, folks. Obama says no to the politics of personal destruction n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I bet
the 13 Democrats, including Senators Leahy and Sanders, who voted against Lieberman didn't consider their vote to be encouraging the "politics of personal destruction."

Despite this vote and Obama's opinion, people will continue to believe that Lieberman is a despicable bastard.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC