Bill Clinton has to be fully vetted.

[ProSense]

There are legitimate questions.

Gupta removed as InfoGROUP chairman amid SEC investigation, shareholder lawsuit

Judge approves settlement in InfoGroup lawsuit

[PBS Poll-435]

1. Fail

;-)

[ProSense]

2. Life.

:)

[PBS Poll-435]

4. You need to work on your anagrams

:-)

[Trajan]

3. Bill Clinton ???

A T T A C K ! ! !

:nuke:

[ProSense]

5. Yes, Bill will be vetted too. n/t

[Trajan]

9. Yes ... Bill has been vetted too ... Many times ....

I just had a thought .... Everyday; DUers 'vett' each other ...

We see those who are inclusive and empowering ...

And we see those who are negative and divisive ....

Yep .... Consider yourself vetted ....

[vanderBeth]

10. When has Bill been vetted in the last 8 years?

[Trajan]

16. Frankly .... I have NO PROBLEM with the Clinton's being fully vetted ...

I would expect that from the President Elect ....

My objection is to the Clinton Hate Parade, on full display, here and now, in DU ....

The knives are being sharpened as we type ...

Could we enjoy a unified and integrated party for at least a few moments ? ....

HAH ! .... right ....

Same as it ever was .....

It's the same as it ever was ....

[joshcryer]

17. Never! Who are the contributors to the Presidential Library!

Who! Clearly Bill is in with TERRORISTS!

[Trajan]

23. Sarah ? ....

Is that you ???

[joshcryer]

26. Who contributed and what do they know?

The Clintons will bring down the administration! :sarcasm:

[Trajan]

31. I am very glad you produced the emote ...

I was about to steal yer weed ....

:smoke:

[FKA MNChimpH8R]

6. Which is why HRC ain't gonna be SoS

I don't think Big Dawg wants to be examined to the degree O's people feel is necessary. Not because he's doing anything crooked, but he's making beaucoup bucks and those sorts of things are always complicated.

[joshcryer]

11. So hubby tells the wife what to do?

Hahaha

[vanderBeth]

20. Uh, no.

This is about GOP'ers tearing down the Hilary choice through her husband.

[joshcryer]

22. So you don't think she would survive the process?

You think her husband is afraid she wouldn't survive the process?

[FKA MNChimpH8R]

30. I think Hillary herself could clear the bar easily n/t

[vanderBeth]

32. Why don't you stop putting words in my mouth and using logic

We aren't talking about what the Clintons did but what the Republicans will make a shitstorm about.

[Beacool]

33. Actually, probably not.

Several Republicans on FOX said today that they thought that Hillary would fly through the senate hearing and one of them was the current Chairman of the party. It's the LW who's having palpitations, not the Repugs.

:shrug:

[FKA MNChimpH8R]

27. Not meant as a slam of HRC at all

But I am sure WJC's financial affairs and those of his foundation are not simple, and the Obama people, justifiably, want to make damned sure that there are no conflicts of interest or questionable dealings in the immediate families of people who are named to cabinet posts. I think potential conflicts of interest, not whatsoever of a sinister or illegal nature, might arise with Bill.

[tomp]

46. "complicated"? there's a euphemism for you. nt

[JVS]

7. NOOOOOOOOOOOO!

NO MORE VETTING CLINTONS EVER
*Insert picture of maniacal Joan Crawford look-alike here*

[PBS Poll-435]

12. Really?

[Zombie2]

25. ........

:rofl:

[1Hippiechick]

8. Before he can draw on the government's contributions to his retirement?!?!? This is INSANE!

:rofl:

[ProSense]

What? n/t

[1Hippiechick]

18. Oh. I thought it said veSted. Never mind.

It was supposed to be funny, as in Roseanne Rosannadanna.

[onehandle]

13. Obama wouldn't have offered this if there was going to be any problems. nt

[joshcryer]

15. Pretty much, but "they" are denying that he made the offer.

Pretty convienient.

[4themind]

48. And for others

they claim not to know whether an offer has or has not been made, and don't take news reports from from anonymous aides as proof ipso facto (just wanted to put out here that there are other perspectives to this). Then again for all I know there are posters here that were in the room when this discussion was supposed to have occurred and know the intimate details....

[KittyWampus]

41. there is zero evidence he offered it.

[joshcryer]

14. Are you suggesting that Hillary would not get the appointment if she was vetted?

[Life Long Dem]

19. Why vet Bill Richardson? Or how about Gates?

[Metric System]

21. ANOTHER thread? I was kind of joking before, but I think it's clear you are indeed obsessed. If

vetting is required for the SOS position, and Hillary is interested in it AND (most importantly) if Obama is interested in having her in that position, then she obviously would (and should) be subjected to the same vetting process as any other potential candidate for the job. So, what's your problem?

[joshcryer]

24. I reckon at least 3 to 4 a day are about this.

The idea that Hillary could get the SoS position drives some of the people here raving mad. :hi:

[PresidentObama]

40. If she actually gets the job, we'll have to get the straightjacket for the OPer n/t

[Trajan]

29. I just came in a few minutes ago ....

And I learned of the OP's mania only a few seconds afterwards ....

Some people cannot hide their uglier parts ... they just keep popping up uncontrollably ....

Obsessive compulsive .....

[Beacool]

34. Yep, obsession is the word.

:eyes:

:7

[ProSense]

35. "ANOTHER thread?" Welcome. I think you missed

this one. I don't see a comment from you there.

I'd be interested in your opinion.

[Metric System]

38. I support Hillary. I'm not a fan of Lieberman. It's interesting she's treated as bad as him on DU

despite the fact that, you know, he actively worked against Obama leading up to the general election.

[Name removed]

39. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[ProSense]

42. You think moronic personal insults make you appear rational?

:nopity:

Cry me a river.


:rofl:

[PresidentObama]

43. Stop. You're taking time away from posting Clinton threads, you better get back to smearing n/t

[ProSense]

44. I'm busy

thanking you for kicking this thread. The OP needs more exposure.

Thanks. :thumbsup:

[PresidentObama]

45. Does it matter if I kick it? If I don't, you'll post three more n/t

[rug]

28. Starr must reexamine Whitewater.

[AtomicKitten]

36. and the detente was going so well

[PresidentObama]

37. How many Clinton threads do you have? n/t

[happychatter]

47. I hope this WHOLE THING turns out to be a media whirly gig with NO substance

seriously

then maybe some of you folks could relax

jeezus, he hasn't even been inaugurated

can I have a minute, please?