Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Whats up with the Clinton SOS leak?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 08:19 AM
Original message
Whats up with the Clinton SOS leak?
Edited on Fri Nov-14-08 08:36 AM by yourguide
I gotta tell you, something smells with this whole thing.

I am not surprised at all that Hillary would be considered, what I am surprised about is that the info was leaked out.

Andrea Mitchell has always been very close to the Clintons and the Clinton team. Andrea said these leaks came from people she has known for years.

Connecting the dots, Obama hired many Clinton alumni as part of the transition team. Before these new faces were on board, there were NO leaks, none.

The only thing that makes sense to me is former Clinton staffers currently hired for the transition were the ones who leaked this. This to me is reminiscent of the weird leaked tactics during the primary in which she was supposedly being considered for Veep. The ONLY leak that came out during the VEEP process was also about Clinton.

Something smells, and if in fact this leak was meant to force Obama's hand then she may find herself without a spot on the team.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. eh, I don't think so.
But I would bet that Andrea jumped the gun...I mean, it wouldn't surprise me if Hillary was being considered, but Andrea does reporting that I don't trust all of the time. Remember when she said during the primaries that Hillary was calling up superdelegates and saying that Obama couldn't win because he was black? And I remember how she was always stirring up trouble between the Obama/Clinton fundraisers after the primary. I am more surprised that they leaked to HER, which makes me think that she just jumped the gun to get the SCOOP!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. She claims two staffers on the transition team...
confirmed it.

I don't think she jumped the gun, I think she reported what she sourced from 2 staffers. Why clarify your sources unless she feels confident?

I dont doubt there was a leak but again, the only leak about VP came from her camp when Obama was choosing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. she did say it was two people who she's known for years
but I don't know...still don't trust Andrea all of the time.,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. which goes back to my speculation
that it was two of the clinton alumni brought on the transition team.

makes sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Well, there are
Edited on Fri Nov-14-08 08:30 AM by ProSense
conflicting reports.

Didn't the Obama team say the announcements are at least two weeks away? The frenzied reporting seems highly bizarre, especially if no one has been contacted.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. exactly.
And I don't trust Andrea because she was making a big deal of "Oh, now Obama HAS to pick her, or else it will be REALLY awkward!" Awkward for drama queens like you who want the scoop maybe, Andrea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. goes back to my point...
of forcing his hand.

Now who benefits from that leak other than Clinton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meldread Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. Prepare for the onslaught.
I pointed out this last night, and was raked over the coals for daring to point out the obvious.

You see, Democratic Underground is not a place for serious political discussions. There are too many crazy people here.

But it is very clear who benefits from this leak and who does not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Ah...
great minds think alike.

can you link me to your thread? would be curious seeing the responses.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meldread Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Here you go.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x4458028

You'll see how quickly people jumped the gun, and I was personally insulted for having "freakanoid suspicions and prejudices". :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. LOL... I've suffered that fate here many times as well.
The unfortunate result of the drippy, drip, drip leakage coming from those "in the know" is that Obama is looking less and less in control of his own people and not-ready-for-primetime. Of course, I don't believe that is true. But someone needs to get the folks around him to clam up. Unless of course the leakage is intentional.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meldread Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. I thought it was intentional, at first.
I didn't even bother to post anything here on DU until hours later. Rachel had Andrea on her show and flat out asked her if her name was simply being floated out as a trial balloon or as a genuine leak. She said she was certain that it was a leak and not a trial balloon. I am not sure why Andrea would say that, and then be quick to point out that her two sources she has known for "years".

So, my line of thinking is that it must be two people in the know and in the Clinton inner circle (or very close to it). The reason I pointed that out, last night, is because it is obvious who benefits from the leak and who is hurt by it. I do not even know why Hillary would want the position, but she flew to Chicago yesterday. In any event what is done is done. I just hope Obama fines the source of the leak and gives them the axe and uses him/her as an example for others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
7. Obama needs go focus his energy on saving the sinking U.S. He doesn't need to spend time and energy
on dealing with the Clintons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
11. They are testing media reaction.... to see if it will be supported. IMHO nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
14. I had the same thoughts, with one exception. If Obama promised her this, she will get it, despite
any leak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Oh, I agree.
Edited on Fri Nov-14-08 08:43 AM by yourguide
But knowing the way Obama's been working, he weighs his options carefully, if she hasnt been promised it she may well be screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
17. its called offering a bone,....that won't happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC