|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Politics_Guy25 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 10:30 AM Original message |
ABC News: Senator Clinton for Secretary of State or Secretary of Defence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 10:31 AM Response to Original message |
1. We need her in the Senate! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Politics_Guy25 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 10:32 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. That's very true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 10:36 AM Response to Reply #2 |
12. If she does go, I want Suozzi to run for it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
THUNDER HANDS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 05:31 PM Response to Reply #12 |
73. ugh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cemaphonic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 12:20 PM Response to Reply #2 |
42. Yeah, she's good in the Senate, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
olkaz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 10:50 AM Response to Reply #1 |
20. I wholeheartedly agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 11:40 AM Response to Reply #1 |
33. They can find a good replacement in NY maybe RFK, Jr. I think she would be a great addition. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ronnykmarshall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 12:33 PM Response to Reply #1 |
45. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alter Ego (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 10:32 AM Response to Original message |
3. Lugar has already said no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DefenseLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 12:39 PM Response to Reply #3 |
49. Lugar said publicly he wasn't interested |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ccharles000 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 10:33 AM Response to Original message |
4. No to Nunn. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
musicblind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 12:37 PM Response to Reply #4 |
47. I agree no to Nunn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 10:34 AM Response to Original message |
5. Clinton, Nunn, Kerry, and Richardson. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Politics_Guy25 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 10:35 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thrill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 10:35 AM Response to Original message |
7. The media doesn't know. Notice they only mention names known to the public |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nicholas D Wolfwood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 10:38 AM Response to Reply #7 |
13. How true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 10:35 AM Response to Original message |
8. State would be cool, but defence makes no sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 11:22 AM Response to Reply #8 |
27. HRC chose committees like HELP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Metric System (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 12:04 PM Response to Reply #27 |
36. WTF are you babbling on about? Hillary herself has said she is happy in the Senate. Paul Begala last |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 01:28 PM Response to Reply #36 |
62. I was referring to all the posts written yesterday on at least three threads |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 10:36 AM Response to Original message |
9. Defense?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Johonny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 10:36 AM Response to Original message |
10. I don't like the idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 10:36 AM Response to Original message |
11. I hope Nunn doesn't get a Cabinet spot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
14. WTF is this obsession with Sam Nunn? Old has-been. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Two Sheds (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
15. Not Defense... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sensitivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 10:43 AM Response to Original message |
16. LINK ???? Goes against prior hints of Richardson or Kerry. Why should she want it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynnTheDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 10:45 AM Response to Original message |
17. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
justiceischeap (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 10:46 AM Response to Original message |
18. We have a lot of great Senators and I'm seeing lots of calls to put them in cabinet posts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 10:49 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Exactly--most Presidents don't raid the Senate for cabinet members--they're too valuable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
justiceischeap (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 11:12 AM Response to Reply #19 |
22. I don't think he did but am not 100% certain. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Princess Buttercup (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 11:15 AM Response to Reply #19 |
24. Ashcroft had just lost his Senate seat when he joined chimp's cabinet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 11:19 AM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Oops, you're right! Thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chovexani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 12:55 PM Response to Reply #18 |
54. If my senator goes for a Cabinet position, her seat is hardly in danger. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kevinds13 (176 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 11:11 AM Response to Original message |
21. I've seen a lot of (R) names floated for SoD |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 11:13 AM Response to Original message |
23. Why would she want to be in his cabinet? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msallied (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 11:21 AM Response to Original message |
26. Why in the hell would she be considered for Sec of Defense?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bushisanidiot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
28. I was hoping she'd be Sec. of State, but Richardson would be good too! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tigereye (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 12:45 PM Response to Reply #28 |
51. I would love to see Richardson in that role! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adigal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 11:26 AM Response to Original message |
29. I want Hillary on the Supreme Court, where she is immune |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 11:33 AM Response to Reply #29 |
30. I'd rather she ran for president again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rvablue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 12:10 PM Response to Reply #30 |
38. So would I but she will be too old.....72 years old in 2012......n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thesquanderer (647 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 12:37 PM Response to Reply #38 |
48. 2012? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rvablue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 01:05 PM Response to Reply #48 |
57. My typing bad...2016 is what I meant...she is 64 now....oops! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
musicblind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 12:42 PM Response to Reply #38 |
50. No she'll be 68 in 2016. She's only 60/61 now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 12:50 PM Response to Reply #38 |
53. She only turned 61 last month. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rvablue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 01:06 PM Response to Reply #53 |
58. Oops...and I'm a Hillary fan...gotta get my stats right...I thought she was 64. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 01:24 PM Response to Reply #58 |
60. That's OK, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phoebe Loosinhouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 11:41 AM Response to Reply #29 |
34. That has always been my dream - to see her on the Supreme Court. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Metric System (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 12:06 PM Response to Reply #29 |
37. She's not interested in being on the SC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 12:31 PM Response to Reply #29 |
44. Me too -- I also feel she'll protect my rights |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoxFan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
31. Richardson for State, Nunn for SecDef |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Passaran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
32. No link? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
35. I'm down with that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rvablue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 12:13 PM Response to Original message |
39. I wanted her for SCOTUS, but changed my mind. Sec of State would be OK but what I'd really like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
40. Still waiting for that "change". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jennicut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 12:58 PM Response to Reply #40 |
56. What change are you expecting? Kerry and co have experience |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 01:47 PM Response to Reply #56 |
65. I agree - Kerry spoke of change in foreign policy since 1966 - a change we never really have had |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrattotheend (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
41. I like Kerry or Richardson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 01:30 PM Response to Reply #41 |
64. Clinton she is good in the Senate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chiefofclarinet (516 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 02:20 PM Response to Reply #64 |
66. There is the Department of Health and Human Services |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 12:31 PM Response to Original message |
43. I want her on the USSC or as a Senator |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
musicblind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
46. Clinton would be FANTASTIC! OMGSH! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
52. Absurd, frankly. She's got no qualifications for either post. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InAbLuEsTaTe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 12:56 PM Response to Original message |
55. Hillary's s warmonger. She should stay in the Senate and work on healthcare, her strength. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rvablue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 01:08 PM Response to Reply #55 |
59. She's a "warmonger"...right...under your critieria, you just voted for a VP warmonger. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InAbLuEsTaTe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 05:19 PM Response to Reply #59 |
69. No, I voted for Obama who was right on the war from day 1. I made it known I wanted Richardson 4 VP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 01:25 PM Response to Reply #55 |
61. Oh, please................... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InAbLuEsTaTe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 05:27 PM Response to Reply #61 |
71. It's all in the public record. My point is Hillary should stick w/ her strength, i.e. healthcare. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yeswecanandwedid (440 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 01:28 PM Response to Original message |
63. I doubt it. I doubt we see either of the Clintons in the WH in a set position. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FUCK_BUSH (184 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 02:21 PM Response to Original message |
67. Senator Clinton for Secretary of State |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SuperTrouper (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 02:24 PM Response to Original message |
68. If Senator Clinton goes to Secretary of State then Caroline Kennedy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 05:22 PM Response to Original message |
70. Hillary, I believe would be a smart move to Secretary of state - what did Condi accomplish? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InAbLuEsTaTe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 05:29 PM Response to Reply #70 |
72. Condi is a complete fool - almost anyone woudl look good in comparison. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 07:49 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC