Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rassmussen nailed it. 52-46. what happened to turnout?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
sarahdemva Donating Member (265 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 06:28 AM
Original message
Rassmussen nailed it. 52-46. what happened to turnout?
i think rasmussen was the most stable poll and got it exactly right. i may be wrong but it doesnt look like turnout will be any higher than in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Marsala Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 06:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. Turnout is higher, just not by huge margins
Also the larger turnout didn't throw the polls off after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarahdemva Donating Member (265 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 06:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. turnout may be less than in 2004
bush got 62 million votes and kerry 59 million. right now Obama has 62 million and mccain 55 million.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. Still lots of votes to be counted
Only 91% reporting in CA, 74% in Oregon, 87% in Colorado, 96% in OH, 56% in WA, 62% in OR, 97% in MA. And a lot of the outstanding votes are probably in big urban precincts, especially in Ohio. Ohio is currently way too close for them to have called it as early as they did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. yeah it looked from some maps as if there was still a lot to count last night
I was kind of surprised....


What about Prop 8?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
14. those vote totals will go much higher, lots of votes still to be counted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. I just saw something like 117,000,000 votes, which is much
higher than in 2004, no? Anyone remember those numbers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarahdemva Donating Member (265 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 06:37 AM
Original message
no
i dont think young people showed up. i dont get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regnaD kciN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
6. If. last time...
...it was 62M Republican and 59M Democratic, and this time it was 62M Democratic and 55M Republican, it wouldn't have to do with "young people not showing up," but rather with people in our demographic showing up quite well, and people in their demographic not showing up at all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. Excellent point....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. AP reporting it could the highest turnout since 1908
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regnaD kciN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. Actually, it's now 52-47...
A five-point margin, as opposed to the 7.6 predicted by Pollster.com and RCP, and the 6.1 projected by 538.com. Maybe there was a "Bradley effect" after all, totaling somewhere between 1.1%-2.6% :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarahdemva Donating Member (265 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 06:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. zogby stunk
and the polls with +10 leads at the end were way off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. Wait until all the results are in...
It'll be closer to 55-45 than it is now.

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Franks Wild Years Donating Member (687 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Bill Clinton's final share was also over estimated both times.
It happens, it's within the margin of error. McCain probably just roused some more or his lukewarm supporters to the polls with his final day efforts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigbrother05 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. Have the early votes been rolled into the totals?
Usually those come in after the precinct reports. Also, there are probably significant vote-by-mail ballots that might not be included.

While it would be great for O to have all the "...est" awards, I'm fine with newest President!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarahdemva Donating Member (265 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. i agree!!
i was just thinking of that one site that said it would be 74 million to 64 million.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
10. Voter turnout rate best in a century AP story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC