Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If the terrorists hit us again before Nov 2...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
IdaBriggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 05:04 PM
Original message
If the terrorists hit us again before Nov 2...
Does that mean Wrong Way will withdraw because he was unable to keep us safe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mr_hat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. C'mon. It'll be K/E's fault >
for raising doubts concerning our war president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democraticinsurgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
2.  perhaps...
because it will likely mean Cheney got tired of waiting and hit us again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. No, it'll be K/E's fault for questioning Chimpy's 'leadership' which
weakened us in the face of our enemies and made us vulnerable. That, or it was all Clinton's fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clinton Crusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Clinton's fault
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cheshire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. They will say God is warning us not to vote for a real man. Kerry/Edwards
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daddybear Donating Member (538 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. Just more Repub lies....
Bush and Rumsfeld have made it chillingly clear that they do not care how many human lives are extinguished in their quest to conquer Iraq and the resources of the Middle East. The death toll in Iraq is climbing and it is climbing rapidly. Hundreds of Iraqis have been killed in heavy fighting in the last 72-hours alone adding to the staggering number of 37,000 Iraqis who have already been killed by the U.S. invasion (according to a recently released detailed study carried out across the cities and villages of Iraq documenting deaths between March 2003 and October 2003). The number of U.S. soldiers killed has now passed the 1,000 mark.

As the White House and Pentagon brass order new deadly assaults to break the back of those resisting the occupation, the heavy-handed military tactics only result in the opposite outcome. The U.S. is bombing homes, killing families, laying siege to neighborhoods, and shooting Iraqis day in and day out on their own streets, in their own land. The intensity and breadth of the insurgency is dramatically increasing and it is gathering ever-new support, energy and recruits from the Iraqi population who are repelled by the tactics ordered by Rumsfeld and company. Rumsfeld boasts that as many 2,500 Iraqis have been killed in the last month. Rumsfeld arrogantly believes that his "Iraqi body count" braggadocio can conceal that the administration’s strategy in Iraq is badly failing. Attacks on U.S. forces "rose to 2,700 in August, from 700 in March" (NY Times September 8.) The parallels with Vietnam become more haunting every day.

As more than 1,000 US soldiers have now been killed in Iraq, the number of wounded, many maimed with horrible and permanent injuries, spirals every day. The official Pentagon count is over 7,000. Who knows the real number? "About 1,100 U.S. soldiers and marines were wounded in Iraq during August, by far the highest combat injury toll for any month since the war began and an indication of the intensity of battles flaring in urban areas," reports the Washington Post on September 5. The Post also reports a huge increase in the number of life-altering brain injuries to U.S. troops.

The people of this country are angry and they should be. The were lied to by the President. In spite of mass antiwar sentiment, the Democrats and Congress (including John Kerry) gave Bush a blank check to go to war when they voted overwhelmingly on October 12, 2002 to illegally hand over their constitutionally mandated authority to Bush so that he could pursue the war against Iraq.

When thousands of people are being killed in Iraq and elsewhere the people must act, as they did during the Vietnam era, making it clear that they cannot be silent in the face of U.S. government atrocities.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IdaBriggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I was trying to be funny, daddybear.
But it really isn't, is it? :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daddybear Donating Member (538 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 06:26 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Not really....
but I do understand... one has to laugh to keep from crying these days with this bunch resident in the white house.

BTW, when I joke, I get slapped at every turn, so maybe I knee-jerk.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
8. I had thought a terrorist attack would help Bush
This is because we tend to rally around our president during times of war. After Cheney's comments the other day, I am not so sure. He essentially said elected us and I guarantee the terrorists will not attack. He would have to eat those words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. No it means TERRA-TAC-DICK got the date wrong
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
milkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
10. No way that will happen. Too iffy for the BFEE--it'll probably hurt bush.
Instead, the cabal will wait until after the election, no matter who wins. If bush wins, an attack justifies additional wars abroad, and additional crackdowns at home. If Kerry wins, an attack will show that cheney was right the other day when he said Kerry will get us killed. There will be tremendous pressure for Kerry to resign from the wingnuts and their media lapdogs. The likely repug win in 2008 will usher in four years of a fascist assault which will make bush's term seem like a holiday at the beach.

If things look bad going into election day the cabal might screw around with terrorism warnings and maybe suspend elections until our war hero president can save us all from the evil-doers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IdaBriggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. The fact that's even a serious possibility...
...scares me nearly senseless....:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vetwife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. I question Cheney when Kerry gets elected. Quite the opposite of
helping Bush..I think it would help Kerry. Bush didn't keep us safe.
Kerry is not in a position to kee us safe. Let us pray nothing happens at any time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 05:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC