Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So, is Bush protected by statue of limitations?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 07:13 AM
Original message
So, is Bush protected by statue of limitations?
I've seen posts saying that Bush could be guilty of anything from disertion to fraud with regard to his National Guard service. Is there a chance he could still be prosecuted for something? Who would have to initiate this? The reason I'm asking is that we all know darn well that the right would rush to prosecute Kerry if he was guilty of a crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. No.
From The US Military Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)

Article 43. STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS
(a) A person charged with absence without leave or missing movement in time of war, or with any offense punishable by death, may be tried at any time without limitation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ochazuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. So, what is most appropriate?
Death penalty? Impeachment?

I read that he would be eligible for military service, having not fulfilled his Guard duties. So, let's send him to fight in Iraq. It would be the ultimate irony.

Oh, and don't give him any body armor like he apparantly thought was best for our troops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainbowreflect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I like your idea. Let him go fight for his war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. Hate to bring this up
But his defense could argue that Vietnam was never a declared
war, so the "time of war" clause could be subject to discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Iraq is not a declared war....so if they use that...look out.
g
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasProgresive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's likely the most that will come out of this is that
Dumbya will get smeared for being the coward he is. My opinion is that he is currently a deserter from the Armed forces, but most witnesses have died or they are up in age. It would be really tough to get a conviction at this late date. One can only hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Florida_Geek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. NO
Article 43. STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS

(a) A person charged with absence without leave or missing movement in time of war, or with any offense punishable by death, may be tried at any time without limitation.

UCMJ (Uni. Code of Military Jus. )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozymandius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. That depends on the crime he allegedly committed.
A desertion charge would still be fair game. Just look at the Korean War veteran who faces possible charges after deserting during that war.

Then others? Don't know. I would be interested to see if a JAG chimes in here. Military law is a peculiar animal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AVID Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
5. Yes - one term limitation for stupid, incompetent fucks statue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
8. There is no federal statute of limitations
The concept is one applicable only to state's which have such a statute. No such federal statute exists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
9. "My daddy got me in the Texas Air National Guard. Mission accomplished."
:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anaxamander Donating Member (550 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
10. The word is "statute." See Seinfeld episode where Elaine takes George's
IQ test for further details. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC