Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

****OPRAH EARLY VOTED, BUT SHE'S NOT THRILLED WITH THE EQUIPMENT!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 03:06 AM
Original message
****OPRAH EARLY VOTED, BUT SHE'S NOT THRILLED WITH THE EQUIPMENT!
"When I voted yesterday electronically, the first vote that you vote for on the ballot is the presidential candidate. It was my first time doing electronic, so I didn't mark the X strong enough, or I held down too long. Because then when I went back to check it, it had not recorded my presidential vote," she said.

She then simulated her meltdown, shaking and breathing heavily while stuttering out the words, "It didn't record my presidential vote."

http://www.bradblog.com/?p=6603


VIDEO: http://www.bradblog.com/?p=6603
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 03:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. I happened to catch that show earlier. ChicagoTalk or something
the people on the panel were pretty funny too. But as she described her problems with voting it occured to me. HOW FUCKING STUPID IS THIS VOTING TECHNOLOGY???? When I go to any normally functioning website that takes me through a series of screens where I need to make selections, it will prompt me if I didn't choose something I needed to. Also, it will have good navigation allowing me to jump to a particular portion of the ballot (think TurboTax GUI).

We are being ridiculously mocked by the shit heads who've foisted this current electronic pile of garbage on the US voters. It is a travesty. It is a sham. It is a mockery. It is a traveshamockery!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stellanoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 03:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well she should check with her producers.
I took the time to write to her shortly after HAVA was passed.

This goes into the "No Shit Sherlock" category.

She's been no where on black disenfranchisement. It's inexcusable.

Hope she does something about it finally.

:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 03:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. She certainly has the influence to get the nation on that page......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gblady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 03:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. agree....
she's a good one to have experienced the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 03:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. She really did point many in the right direction for a new President.
Perhaps she can be as powerful pointing the way to a different voting system.

We're looking for Change anyways!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 03:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. Gee Oprah, where ya been , girlfriend?
Edited on Sat Nov-01-08 03:48 AM by SoCalDem
We (some of us) even wrote to you waaaaaay back in 2001, BEGGING you to take this on as a signature issue that someone with YOUR stature could move forward, but apparently you thought spiritual awakening & make overs of celebrities' kitchens
were more important..

If YOU had been flogging this issue even ONE time a MONTH, from 2001...who knows what migth have happened by now.. Maybe we WOULD have had some real progress in getting our elections under control..

Goodness knows, there are certainly enough HIGH PROFILE experts available to be on your shows...people who could show in REAL TIME, just how easy it is to hack into these machines and change election results..


Too bad for ALL of us without hour long tv shows that WE are 100% in charge of, if this election "goes bad"...like the "00 & '04 ones did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 03:59 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I think what happened was other than Cynthia McKinney
Edited on Sat Nov-01-08 04:06 AM by democracy1st
there was no political figure that took this issue on with Bradblog like passion. This has been a issue since 2000 and the Democrats refused to give it proper attention.

American Blackout

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VPOmOTyDm1w
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 04:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Saving the Union is not Oprah's responsibility. Maybe en masse notification of our ELECTED OFFICIALS
might have had a bigger impact? Protests?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 05:22 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Au contraire...
Edited on Sat Nov-01-08 05:22 AM by SoCalDem
Things that get discussed on Oprah's show BECOME issues.. and she had (until recently) a broad swath of the public as her "base".. She was perfectly positioned to speak to the women (mostly) of BOTH parties, and to do it in a bi-partisan way that would have resonated..

My fear is that if Obama wins, there will be no real impetus to change something that "worked" for us (this time), even if we have the power needed to change it...and if we lose, well...we end up with McCain in no particular hurry to change anything..and of course Oprah is quite the partisan now, and emphasis on the issue would be viewed through that lens, and attention to it would be seen a sour grapes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 04:02 AM
Response to Original message
8. She had said that about Stedman as well...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 04:14 AM
Response to Original message
9. She noticed it only because the voting machine spit out a receipt. If there had been no receipt,
she would have left believing she had voted for Obama for President.

As soon as this election is over, we MUST devote our time and money to this issue. Badger mayors, town councils, state houses, etc. We just MUST.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 04:16 AM
Response to Original message
10. BTW, if she had not been Oprah, would anyone have let her go to the machine a second time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 05:07 AM
Response to Original message
12. I voted on the same equipment. I DON"T agree with this assessment.
I voted in Chicago. First of all, after you place all of your votes the machine then goes thru every vote you made so that you check it. Then you can see if you voted wrong it prints it and asks you if this is correct. Oprah saw on the paper it wasn't correct and she CHANGED it to what she wanted.

THERE WAS NO ERROR. Watch the video again if you don't believe me. She corrected the machine. Her vote IS on paper also. It has a paper printout that goes into the machine so that people can count the paper ballots in event of a tie.

I voted on the same machine. It's not a problem. It would have been a problem if you couldn't double check it. It FORCES you to double check it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC