Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OK, guys--HERE'S the (scoff) memo unlinked. And it's even more pathetic than I thought it would be

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 01:21 PM
Original message
OK, guys--HERE'S the (scoff) memo unlinked. And it's even more pathetic than I thought it would be
Edited on Fri Oct-31-08 01:22 PM by Bicoastal
A lot of you are having trouble getting past the link, probably because Freepers are swarming to it like flies on Roadkill. So here it is--read and laugh.

DISCLAIMER: the views expressed below are not Bicoastal's, but in fact most likely a coordinated effort to improve morale in the GOP through the ludicrous idea that they can still win this thing by a landslide, as they have no money left for GOTV resources, and they don't want the entire party staying home and drinking their way through November 4th.

Posted at Red-state.com yesterday.

What you were never intended to know in this election

A Hillary staffer comes clean

Posted by: Anonymous_14
Thursday, October 30, 2008 at 04:52PM CDT
25 Comments
After a long and careful consideration of all the implications and possible consequences of my actions today, I have decided to go through with this in the hope that our country can indeed be guided into the right direction. First, a little personal background… I am a female grad student in my 20’s, and a registered Democrat. During the primaries, I was a campaign worker for the Clinton candidacy. I believed in her and still do, staying all the way to the bitter end. And believe me, it was bitter. The snippets you’ve heard from various media outlets only grazed the surface. There was no love between the Clinton and Obama campaigns, and these feelings extended all the way to the top. Hillary was no dope though, and knew that any endorsement of Obama must appear to be a full-fledged one. She did this out of political survival. As a part of his overall effort to extend an olive branch to the Clinton camp and her supporters, Obama took on a few Hillary staff members into his campaign. I was one such worker. Though I was still bitterly loyal to Hillary, I still held out hope that he would choose her as VP. In fact, there was a consensus among us transplants that in the end, he HAD to choose her. It was the only logical choice. I also was committed to the Democratic cause and without much of a second thought, transferred my allegiance to Senator Obama.

I’m going to let you in on a few secrets here, and this is not because I enjoy the gossip or the attention directed my way. I’m doing this because I doubt much of you know the true weaknesses of Obama. Another reason for my doing this is that I am lost faith in this campaign, and feel that this choice has been forced on many people in this country. Put simply, you are being manipulated. That was and is our job – to manipulate you (the electorate) and the media (we already had them months ago). Our goal is to create chaos with the other side, not hope. I’ve come to the realization (as the campaign already has) that if this comes to the issues, Barack Obama doesn’t have a chance. His only chance is to foster disorganization, chaos, despair, and a sense of inevitability among the Republicans. It has worked up until now. Joe the Plumber has put the focus on the issues again, and this scares us more than anything. Being in a position to know these things, I will rate what the Obama campaign already knows are their weak links from the most important on down.

1 – Hillary voters. Internal polling suggests that at best, we are taking 70-75% of these voters. Other estimates are as low as 60% in some areas – particularly Ohio and western PA. My biggest problem with this campaign’s strategy was the decision NOT to offer Hillary the VP slot. She was ready and able to take this on, and would have campaigned enthusiastically for it. This selection would have also brought virtually all of her supporters into the fold, and the Obama campaign knew it. Though I have no way of knowing this for certain, and I do admit that I am relying on internal gossip, Senator Obama actually went against the advice of his top advisors. They wanted him to choose her, but the only significant opposition to this within the campaign came from Barack and Michelle Obama. In short, he let personal feelings take precedence over what was the most logical thing to do. Biden, by the way, has been a disaster inside the campaign. Everyone cringes whenever he gives an interview, and he creates so many headaches as the campaign has to stay on their toes in order to disseminate information and spin whatever it was he was trying to say.

2 – Sarah Palin. Don’t believe what the media is telling you about how horrible a choice she was. Again, our internal polling suggest that though she has had a minimal impact on pulling disaffected Hillary Democrats to McCain, she has done wonders in mobilizing the base for McCain. Another thing – we were completely taken by surprise with her pick. In my capacity in the research department, I looked into the backgrounds of Leiberman, Romney, Pawlenty and Ridge, and prepared briefs. I don’t mind bragging that we had pretty good stuff on all of them. With Leiberman, the plan was to paint him as an erratic old-timer who didn’t have a clue as to what he was doing (pretty much a clone of McCain). In Romney, we had him pegged as an evil capitalist who cut jobs. Pawlenty was going to get the “Quayle treatment”, or more precisely: a pretty face, with no valid experience. Tom Ridge was going to be used to provide a direct link from McCain to Bush. As you can see, we were quite enamored of all of them. Then the unexpected happened – Sarah Palin. We had no clue as to how to handle her, and bungled it from the start. Though through our misinformation networks, we have successfully taken some of the shine off. But let there be no doubt. She remains a major obstacle. She has singlehanded solidified “soft” Republican support, mobilized the McCain ground game, and has even had some appeal to independents and Hillary voters. This is what our internal polling confirms.

3 – Obama’s radical connections. Standards operating procedure has been to cry “racism” whenever one of these has been brought up. We even have a detailed strategy ready to go should McCain ever bring Rev. Wright up. Though by themselves they are of minimal worth, taken together, Rev. Wright, Bill Ayers, Father Pfelger, and now, Rashid Khalili, are exactly what the campaign does not need. The more focus on them, the more this election becomes a referendum on Obama. The campaign strategy from the very beginning was to make this election a referendum on Bush. Strategists have been banging their head on how successfully McCain has distanced himself from Bush. This has worked, and right now the tide is in his favor. People are taking a new look at Barack Obama, and our experience when this happens tells us this is not good news at all. When they take a look at him, one or more of these names are bound to be brought up. McCain has wisely not harped on this in recent weeks and let voters decide for themselves. This was a trap we set for him, and he never fully took the bait. Senator Obama openly dared him to bring up Ayers. This was not due to machismo on the part of Obama, but actually due to campaign strategy. Though McCain’s reference to Ayers fell flat in the last debate, people in the Obama campaign were actually disappointed that he didn’t follow through on it more and getting into it. Our focus groups found this out: When McCain brings these connections up, voters are turned off to him. They’d rather take this into consideration themselves, and when this happens, our numbers begin to tank.

4 – The Bradley Effect. Don’t believe these polls for a second. I just went over our numbers and found that we have next to no chance in the following states: Missouri, Indiana, North Carolina, Florida, New Hampshire and Nevada. Ohio leans heavily to McCain, but is too close to call it for him. Virginia, Pennsylvania, Colorado, New Mexico and Iowa are the true “toss up states”. The only two of these the campaign feels “confident” in are Iowa and New Mexico. The reason for such polling discrepancy is the Bradley Effect, and this is a subject of much discussion in the campaign. In general, we tend to take a -10 point percentage in allowing for this, and are not comfortable until the polls give us a spread well over this mark. This is why we are still campaigning in Virginia and Pennsylvania! This is why Ohio is such a desperate hope for us! What truly bothers this campaign is the fact that some pollsters get up to an 80% “refuse to respond” result. You can’t possibly include these into the polls. The truth is, people are afraid to let people know who they are voting for. The vast majority of these respondents are McCain supporters. Obama is the “hip” choice, and we all know it.

As part of my research duties, I scour right wing blogs and websites to get somewhat of a “feel” as to what is being talked about on the other side. Much of it is nonsense, but there are some exceptions which give the campaign jitters. A spirited campaign has been made to infiltrate many pro-Hillary sites and discredit them. A more disorganized, but genuine effort has also been made to sow doubts among the unapologetically right wing sites such as redstate.com. Don’t you guys get it? This has been the Obama campaign’s sole strategy from the very beginning! The only way he wins is over a dispirited, disorganized, and demobilized opposition. This is how it has been for all of his campaigns. What surprises me is that everyone has fallen for it. You may point to the polls as proof of the inevitability of all of this. If so, you have fallen for the oldest trick in the book. How did we skew these polls, you might ask? It all starts with the media “buzz” which has been generated over the campaign. Many stories are generated on the powerful Obama ground game, and how many new voters were registered. None of this happens by coincidence. It is all part of the poll-skewing process. This makes pollsters change their mixes to reflect these new voters and tilt the mix more towards Democratic voters. What is not mentioned or reported on is not the “under-reported cell phone users or young voters” we hear so much about. What is underreported is you.

I changed my somewhat positive opinion of this campaign during the unfair and sexist campaign against Sarah Palin. I will never agree with her on the issues and will probably never vote for her, but I am embarrassed of what has happened. I can’t ignore our own hand in all of this. What I do know is that I will not be voting for Obama this time around. Treat that as you will.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Now THAT is hysterical! :D
I love their vivid imagination!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Essene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. "through our misinformation networks" - LOL
This is comical.

I am eager to see what ever media jump on this Bogus Story #735.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. That alone is a huge tipoff that it's RW crap.
This isn't authentic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hell hath no fury like a delusional psychotic.
Even if they dwell only in the imagination of a master parodist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. Easy to falsify > > >
If she has access to what the Obama campaign really believes then we have to accept that the Obama campaign is intentionally running against what they truly believe.

None of the top-level dems are campaigning in Pennsylvania. They are campaigning in states the fake memo claims the Obama campaign believes to be hopeless.

So it's straight up fake. If the campaign thought State A was close and State B was hopeless they wouldn't be campaigning in State B.

QE-motherfucking-D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Right!
If Obama thought he was going to Virginia, why end the campaign there on Monday night?

Why swing through Colorado if he thought it was a lost cause? Why battle in Ohio this weekend if it were a lost cause?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. Made all the better by the freakin' TYPOS!
You'd think if this "woman" was in the "RESEARCH DEPARTMENT" she would actually KNOW the name of Rasheed Khalidi... NOT "Khalili"

THis is hysterical. I cannot believe how gullible people are.

Yeah.. that Sarah Palin, every poll shows her as a drag on the ticket, but NOT Obama's internals. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. Better grammar than the standard right-wing "Hillary Clinton fan" writers
They out themselves pretty fast, though: "Joe the Plumber has put the focus on the issues again, and this scares us more than anything."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueState Donating Member (370 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. Several points are completely bogus.
One stands out re: "radical" connections - "Standards operating procedure has been to cry “racism” whenever one of these has been brought up."

This simply has not happened. I have not once, not even when it was called for, heard the campaign countered criticism with anything even implying racism.

Next to no chance in the following states - Missouri, Indiana, North Carolina, Florida, New Hampshire and Nevada????

New Hampshire is in the bag. Nevada highly likely. Missouri, Florida and NC very possible.

All i can say to the whole fiction is "Oh please!!!"






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. Paint Romney as an evil Capitalist? Well that shows her true colors.
And she researched LIE(not LEI)berman and doesn't even know how to spell his name?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. "Ashley Todd? Is that you? " You make GREAT points. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. Oh, that's rich. Looks like one of the more educated righties
tried to devise a cute little scheme.

Won't work, but nice try.

(BTW, he showed his hand with the "sexist" bit about Sarah Palin at the end. EVERY SINGLE female Dem I know, including Hillary supporters, think that Sarah has been using the "sexy" angle to gain votes. We are not fooled, and we are not "sexist". SHE is.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wallwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. Almost as believable as the Left Behind books!
Didn't know what to do about Palin?! Sheesh!! Maybe let her go out on an unscripted interview.

Our "misinformation" networks?! Ha!! Reminds me of the old line said by the Dem to the Repug: If you stop lying about me, I'll stop telling the truth about you.

Assholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sidney J Mussburger Donating Member (448 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
12. I made it through the first 3 paragraphs
This shit doesn't make me laugh. It makes me angry. Thanks for spreading this garbage further.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
13. why is this crap different from all the other crap?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
14. That's RW bullshit
That's for a puke keyboard warrior in their mothers basement. You can tell by the language they use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
15. It's like a photographic negative of reality
Every single point in that memo is opposite of what is objectively true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
18. Oh, look Another PUMA with verbal diarrhea and a pack of lies. Big whoop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Accepting that the author is a "PUMA" is as gullible as believing any of the rest of it
Edited on Fri Oct-31-08 01:44 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Thank you for making that point. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foo_bar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #20
47. the author doesn't call herself (?) a PUMA, though
OP: A spirited campaign has been made to infiltrate many pro-Hillary sites and discredit them

I suppose a repub familiar with the landscape could replicate this kind of paranoid shibboleth peculiar to pro-Hillary-anti-Obama sites (along with "the sexist and unfair campaign against Sarah Palin"), but if that's the case, self-identified PUMAs don't seem to notice the difference (although it might be hairsplitting since they're already functional republicans by their own admission):
Sounds like she needs to head over here and see what this forum has to offer

http://www.hillaryclintonforum.net/discussion/showthread.php?t=39446

I have heard the 80 percent refusal statistic before. Supposedly, a representative from one of the polling firms went on Fox and said that in a normal election year they get a 30-40 percent hangup rate, while this year it's 80 percent. I didn't actually see/hear this guy on TV myself. I read about it here or on one of the other Hillary sites.

(ibid)

Not exactly earth-shattering information since we all know this stuff to be true already, that’s why we’re PUMAs. So, even if this is some kind of reverse psychology “astrofucking,” it’s unlikely to change anybody’s mind or resolve.

http://cinie.wordpress.com/2008/10/30/take-this-for-what-its-worth-to-you/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
19. Who was the intended audience of this "memo"?
At turns it seems to waver between being a warning to fellow Dem insiders to being a revelation to wingnuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Okie4Obama Donating Member (188 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
21. That memo is awesome, and by awesome, I mean sad for them.
Republicans are keeping it focused on the issues? Oh so that explains the preponderance of their ads being negative attacks on associations instead of what to do about the economy. Idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KurtNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
22. "internal polling" is a euphemism for "pulling numbers out of our @ss"
bunk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
24. This is something Hannity could whip up. Hardly "inside information"
just typical RW trash talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blondiegrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
25. I love the smell of desperation in the afternoon. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quezacoatl Donating Member (105 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
26. I was waiting for the part
where she says "unless you forward this memo to 10 of your friends in the next 24 hours something bad will happen to you."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatGund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
27. I wonder if it's the same right winger who posted this gem....
http://hillbuzz.wordpress.com/2008/10/27/that-is-what-change-means-for-barack-the-redistributor-it-means-taking-your-money-and-giving-it-to-someone-else/#comment-13554

Ok, I want to clear my conscious a little. Hopefully you could make a blog post to help some fellow clinton supporters out.
I work for a campaign and can’t wait for this week to be over.
I was doing it for a job. I was not a fan of any candidate but over time grew to love HRC.
The internal campaign idea is to twist, distort, humiliate and finally dispirit you.
We pay people and organize people to go to all the online sites and “play the part of a clinton or mccain supporter who just switched our support for obama”
We do this to stifle your motivation and to destroy your confidence.
We did this the whole primary and it worked.
Sprinkle in mass vote confusion and it becomes bewildering. Most people lose patience and just give up on their support of a candidate and decide to just block out tv, news, websites, etc.
This surprisingly has had a huge suppressing movement and vote turnout issues.
Next, we infiltrate all the blogs and all the youtube videos and overwhelm the voting, the comments, etc. All to continue this appearance of overwhelming world support.
People makes posts to the effect that the world has “gone mad”
Thats the intention. To make you feel stressed and crazy and feel like the world is ending.
We have also had quite a hand in skewing many many polls, some we couldn’t control as much as we would have liked. But many we have spoiled over. Just enough to make real clear politics look scarey to a mccain supporter. Its worked, alough the goal was to appear 13-15 points ahead.
see, the results have been working. People tend to support a winner, go with the flow, become “sheeple”
The polls are roughly 3-5 points in favor of Barack. Thats due to our inflation of the polls and pulling in the sheeple.
Our donors, are the same people who finance the MSM. Their interests are tied, Barack then tends to come across as teflon. Nothing sticks. And trust, there were meetings with Fox news. The goal was to blunt them as much as possible. Watch Bill Oreilly he has become much more diplomatic and “fair and balanced” and soft. Its because he wants to retain the #1 spot on cable news and to do that he has to have access to the Obama campaign and we worked hard at stringing him a long and keeping him soft for an interview swap. It worked and now he is anticipating more access. So he is playing it still soft.
This is why nothing sticks.
The operation is massive, the goal is to paint a picture that is that of a winner, regardless of the results.
There is no true inauguration draft or true grant park construction going on. There will be a party, but we are boasting beyond the truth to make it seem like the election is wrapped up.
Our goal is to continue to make you lose your moral. We worked hard at persuasion and paying off and timing and playing the right political numbers to get key republican endorsements to make it seem even more like it was over and the world was coming to an end for you all.
There is a huge staff of people working around the clock, watching every site, blogs, etc. We flood these sites. We have had a goal to overwhelm.
The truth is here. I could go on and on, but you get the picture.
I am saying this because I know HRC was better for the country, and now realize this. I was too late by the time I connected to her. To me Barack was just a cool young dude that seemed like a star. I didn’t know him or his policies, but now I understand more than I care to and I realize his interests are more for him, and the DNC and all working like puppets with dean. I always thought a president wanted the better good for the country. The end result I see is everyone dependent on the government, this means more and more people voting for the DNC. This means the future is forever altered. I don’t see this as america, so I am now supporting John Mccain.
Sarah Palin is a huge threat, and our campaign has feared her like you can’t imagine. If it seems unfair how she has been treated, well its because she has had a team working round the clock to make her look like a fool.
this is a big conspiracy and I am so shocked that its not realized.
We released a little blurb the other day that the Obama campaign was already working on reelection and now putting our efforts towards 2012. This was to make it seem like it was above us to continue caring about 2008. Trust me, its a lie. David is very smart, but its a sticky ugly not very truthful kind of intelligence.
Its not over yet, but I think the machine is working. And its a hill to climb.
I will be quitting my post on nov 5th and my vote will be for John Mccain. Fortunately, my position has been a marketing position and I don’t feel I had any part of anything I would feel guilty for. But I look forward to getting out of this as the negativity and environment upsets me.
I wish you all well, and goodluck.
PS my name is not really sarah. but I am a female and I understand your plight.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. BUSTED!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #27
49. Could be...
but in the OP, she says she was a Hillary supporter to the "bitter end." Here she says she didn't connect with Hillary until it was "too late."

But that's a heck of a find, either way!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
28. Definitely bogus.
For me, the Palin is not so bad comment

and

highlighting Khalidi (when McLiar awarded Khalidi $400K+ while he was at IRI)

and even pushing Ayers still amazes me when the Republican donor Annenbergs gave Ayers millions of dollars for his work

and

pretending the Obama team ran an "unfair and sexist campaign" against Palin. I'm sure they studiously avoided any sexist comments. There's plenty of material against Palin without touching any of that.

Republicans have been desperate to accuse the Obama team of being as nasty as they have. THey can't find any evidence of that so they have to sweep the whole blogosphere into their argument and say that
any sexist comment anywhere is not independent ranting but is somehow tied to the Obama campaign. Imagine what horrors the Obama team could tag the McLiar team with if they also used material from the whole blogosphere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sampsonblk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
30. That's about at stupid and bogus as it gets! LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIdaho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
31. "if this comes to the issues, Barack Obama doesn’t have a chance..."
OMG - this is priceless! Yes - twenty something students usually have free and full access to internal polling data in a presidential campaign...

What a load of cobblers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
32. "Everyone cringes whenever he (Obama) gives an interview..." Yeah right.
Nice projection there by the wingnut who wrote this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
33. Anything that starts off with the person claiming they're for the other side, but they must confess
out of a need to come clean.....
BULLSHIT!






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomKoolzip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
34. Man, if Clifford Irving had been alive today, imagine what he could have gotten away with.
Edited on Fri Oct-31-08 02:35 PM by RandomKoolzip
No fuckin' way this is legit. The author is using right-wing vocabulary, rightist code words ("radical connections"?!), and there's no specific "inside" information that would mark this as coming from a true insider from the Obama campaign, i.e. names of staffers, etc. This is about as fake as fake gets, and the fucker didn't even have to try and forge any handwriting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neomonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
35. "The Pawlenty treatment"
Pawlenty was going to get the “Quayle treatment”, or more precisely: a pretty face, with no valid experience.

I'm at a loss for words with that one. I'm so glad McShame didn't just choose any pretty face with no experience!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orwell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #35
46. Actually...
...Pawlenty is pretty smart, well traveled, and a much better pick for McCain's VP than Caribou B. Pawlenty would not have gotten "the Quayle treatment" because he is much brighter than Quayle, as is Bobby Jindahl.

Those two would have been trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
36. If she's an Obama staffer, I'm a unicorn.
:eyes:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demokatgurrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
37. "I am lost faith in this campaign".
Huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phredicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. All your delusion are belong to us!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
38. BULLSHIT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phredicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
39. As for the "Bradley effect" stuff: how should we suppose they "know" that
people are lying to independent polls, but coming clean to the Obama campaign's internal polling? Does the campaign have some sort of special mind-reading polling? That is some seriously internal internal polling.:crazy::silly::wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Curtland1015 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Not to mention... 10%? Even those that believe in the Bradley Effect...
...give it 6% tops.

If it exists at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fla Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
42. In trying to prove her creds she outs herself.
"Obama took on a few Hillary staff members into his campaign. I was one such workers."

"In my capacity in the research department, I looked into the backgrounds of Leiberman, Romney, Pawlenty and Ridge, and prepared briefs. "

"As part of my research duties, I scour right wing blogs and websites to get somewhat of a “feel” as to what is being talked about on the other side."

The writer did not say she had quit the campaign. So she goes ahead and pretty much points her finger at herself. If this was true, no sane person, if they were still working with the Obama campaign or for that matter in any job, would describe themselves so explicatively. I will have to assume that if this is a real Obama worker, she lost her job as of 05:00PM CDT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juno jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
43. Let them continue the PUMA delusion
It worked too well, now they think it exists! Talk about creating reality, you fell for your own lie. They're going to be so disappointed when millions of raging Hillary fans don't come rushing out to turn the tide. Priceless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
44. boy, that's rich
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrsBrady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
45. wow, i found out she needed some really tall boots after getting up from her chair when writing that
:boring:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
48. Why is this tripe even on DU?
No offense to bicoastal, but it is hardly worthy of having here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC