Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senator Norm Coleman Sues Democratic Opponent Al Franken For Defamation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-08 03:09 PM
Original message
Senator Norm Coleman Sues Democratic Opponent Al Franken For Defamation
Sen. Norm Coleman announced on Thursday that he was filing a lawsuit against his Democratic opponent Al Franken and the Franken campaign over what he deemed defamation of character.

If the move seems dramatic, it shouldn't. This is now the fourth time that the Minnesota Republican has filed a suit late in the course of his runs for office.

During the gubernatorial race in 1998, Coleman filed and later dropped a complaint against his Democratic rival Hubert Humphrey III over an issue of unfair campaign practices. In 2002, the state's Republican party (operating, ostensibly, on Coleman's behalf), filed a complaint against then Senator Paul Wellstone, accusing him of inciting "union thugs" to rough up a GOP cameraman. And, again in 2002, the Coleman campaign filed a separate suit against Wellstone for distorting his stance on social security.

Aides to Coleman, speaking Thursday morning at a hastily organized press conference, seemed far more interested in generating political theatrics than they did in explaining a serious legal quibble.

For starters, their complaint was directed at an advertisement that the Franken campaign aired that claimed Coleman was a stooge of oil interests. The spot was standard fare for politics. Indeed, the National Republican Senatorial Committee has done far worse, accusing Franken of writing pornography, laughing at the disabled, humiliating minorities and demeaning women. And even Coleman's Communications Director Mark Drake acknowledged that the Franken spot was based on "half-truths" (so some of it was accurate?). Only later did he say of the suit:

"It is not a tactic. Sen. Coleman is being falsely attacked. These are flat out falsehoods, this goes beyond the typical tit-for-tat that you see in a campaign... We just want Minnesotans to know, take a look at it. There is one campaign waging a positive campaign...and you have one candidate who will clearly say anything to get elected."

Moreover, the Coleman campaign spent much of the press conference spouting off criticisms of the government watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. The non-partisan organization has labeled the Minnesota Senator one of the most corrupt members of the Senate for, among other things, receiving a highly discounted apartment from a major GOP donor and allegedly receiving free suits from another Republican hand.

"CREW is a liberal front group," said Drake. "They do have a few Republicans but overwhelmingly, look at the record, since this was created this is a liberal front group... it is overwhelmingly biased against Republican candidates. The complaints they do against Democrats are window dressing."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/30/norm-coleman-sues-al-fran_n_139287.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-08 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. What a dick.
Sadly, it's not looking good for Al. Let's hope that the Obama wave does the right thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. What are you basing that on? /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Here...
Edited on Thu Oct-30-08 03:24 PM by onehandle
Coming off what many view as his strongest debate performance of the campaign last Thursday, Coleman leads Franken 43% to 39% in the latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of voters in the state.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=7654670

and here...

A new NBC News/Mason-Dixon survey finds Sen. Norm Coleman (R-MN) leading challenger Al Franken (D) by six points, 42% to 36%, with 12% favoring Independence Party candidate Dean Barkley.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x4338005
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. Thanks. I don't trust mason dixon polls, they are always a right wing bias
however, I cannot understand what is wrong with Minnesota. coleman voted almost identically with bush

unbelievable


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. I sure hope Al pulls it off
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. me too... /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #11
20. Not today (Friday)
Edited on Fri Oct-31-08 11:53 AM by mac56
Minnesota Public Radio - U of M Humphrey Institute poll shows Franken at 41%, Coleman at 37%, Barkley at 17% among likely voters. Margin of error = 4.6%, so it's being called a statistical dead heat.

http://minnesota.publicradio.org/collections/special/columns/news_cut/archive/2008/10/mprhumphrey_senate_poll_its_an.shtml?refid=0

Edited to add link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. oh Mac
thank you so much for that!!!!!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaneQPublic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-08 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Jeez, what a pussy.
As Hillary said, "If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllieB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-08 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. What a big f*ckin' baby.
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samdogmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-08 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good grief! I sure hope this backfires on Coleman and turns off voters.
To me, he looks like an immature bully who runs and hides behind his parents when the kid he's been taunting decides to strike back!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-08 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. good luck with that Norman... NOT


get ready to say by by to your senate seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-08 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. See, in defamation, Coleman will have to prove he is NOT
a stooge of the oil companies

might be REAL hard to do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edbermac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-08 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. Defamation of character?
Shouldn't it be "Definition of character", Norm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-08 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. Ah Norm, if you can't stand the heat of politics - STFU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-08 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. I thought is was the "liberals"
that run around with their high-priced trial lawyers.

:sarcasm:

IOKIYAR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-08 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
12. Franken should file a lawsuit against Coleman for being a stupid jackass.
Or for killing babies.

or not visiting his grandmother during the Christmas holidays.

or...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-08 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
13. Man, what a whiny little bitch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-08 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
14. I guess he missed what happened when Fox News sued Franken
over "fair and balanced"...

BWA HA HA...

Bring it on Norm...



:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FKA MNChimpH8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-08 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. Whiny little Shitheel Norm
What a usless SHPOS this asshat is. I hope Barack's coattails are long enough......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-08 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
16. What did Franken call him- A Republican?
Sorry, dude, truth hurts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BoneDaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-08 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
17. IF defamatiion of character was actually enforced
then the entire republican party would be in jail for eternity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viking12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. Defamation is a civil issue, not a criminal one
Just sayin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BoneDaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. lol
it was an exaggeration, hyperbole. Stop being so literal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
21. Coleman brought lawsuits against former opponents 3 times, only to drop the cases once the election
was over? If Al Franken doesn't make a commercial attacking Norm for repeatedly bringing frivolous law suits as political theatrics that tie up our legal system and cost taxpayers thousands of dollars, benefiting Norm Coleman exclusively, he's really giving up something powerful here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viking12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
22. ..but, but, but, RWers hate frivolous lawsuits.
Damn trial lawyers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
24. Norm gonna call McNasty and Bush to come bail him out of twoubles
Cry baby wuss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
25. There goes all of that money he spent on making himself out to be a "Regular Guy"
This will not help - period. Franken needs to hammer this home because people pay attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
28. You can't defame someone when you tell the truth about them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
29. Call a waaaaaahhhhhhumulance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC