Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Big Picture: Comparing 2004 polling averages with 2004 polling results

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-28-08 09:17 PM
Original message
Big Picture: Comparing 2004 polling averages with 2004 polling results
http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/_rcp_2004result_2004rcp_now.php

The link above goes to probably the best available predictor of next week's results (not counting, obviously, late breakers going either blue or insane). TPM points out that the Real Clear Politics averaging of polls was an excellent predictor of performance four years ago.

The exceptions were Florida, Missouri, Nevada, & West Virginia, where Bush did better than the RCP averaged forecasted. In all other states RCP was within 2 points of the final result.

* In Florida Bush beat the forecast by 5.5%,
* In Missouri Bush beat the forecast by 3%
* Bush won Nevada, but by 3.5% less than the forecast showed - so Dems did better than expected there
* Bush won West Virginia by 4.5% more than forecasted.

According to RCP:

Obama is ahead in Florida by 2.7% now. He needs a bigger margin to overcome the "special circumstances" that are no longer truly special in Florida

Obama is ahead by half a point in Missouri. The trend is positive, but this will be a big nailbiter.

Obama is ahead by 3.5 in Nevada.

McCain is up by 8% in West Virginia. But oddly, he's started running heavy ad rotations there this week. Why should he be worried?





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-28-08 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. WV media buys bleed into VA, OH, and PA
It's probably a "four birds with one stone" theory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-28-08 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. What a positive spin on "scatter shot aimless shouting"
Virginia & Pennsylvania are lost to them. The only reason they deny it is that they need PA to win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-28-08 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Well, you know, I'm a positive kind of guy...
The McCampaign is only slowly waking up to their situation in PA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-28-08 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Walking my dog is a good time for thinking...
Edited on Tue Oct-28-08 09:26 PM by liberalmuse
and this is timely, because tonight I was thinking how the polls in 2004 did indeed predict the election results fairly close. I do remember that Bush was slightly ahead of Kerry, and I thought that more Dems would come out and Kerry would win, but that didn't happen. I was thinking tonight that the McCain supporters believe that he will come on top of pretty much insurmountable polling deficits. I think we were much more realistic with Kerry's chances in 2004, than the 'pubs are with McCain's chances. The polls in 2004 fluctuated by a couple of points ahead to almost a couple points behind just before the election. Perhaps I have a crappy memory, but that's what I remember.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 02:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC