Mason-Dixon Montana Poll: McCain 48, Obama 44

[MadBadger]

Via MSNBC

[Thrill]

1. Did they factor in Ron Paul?

[cbc5g]

2. If it doesn't factor in Ron Paul, it's invalid

[kwolf68]

3. The fact Obama is in play in Montana

Can only be interpreted as WONDERFUL news for Obama.

[thevoiceofreason]

5. And Mason-Dixon has an historic R slant

[kwolf68]

8. Maybe so...but even

If they polled every single voter in that state and it came up 48-44 for McCain, it's game over. Montana is an interesting state in that it has shown the open-mindedness to select Democrats...It's evident that Montana (like Virginia) has found some good Democratic candidates to run in a state that isn't traditionally Democratic.

That still tells me that like Virginia...Montana will send 'their type of Dems' to congress, but heck no in Presidential elections.

However, now we see Virginia is solidly behind Obama and Montana is 'thinking about Obama'...which goes 'against the norm' of those two states. That tells me that McCain is in deep shit.

[Schulzz]

4. And Mason-Dixon polls are less favorable for Obama in most cases.

Not bad, in my opinion.

[Hope And Change]

9. Agreed.

[Bleacher Creature]

6. To put this in context, Bush won the state by 21 points in 2004.

[WI_DEM]

7. Good news! Obama certainly has a chance to win Montana.