Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why don't we vote like they do in Canada....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Mossbeach Donating Member (95 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 09:54 PM
Original message
Why don't we vote like they do in Canada....
1) Take a paper ballot (actual sample)


2) Fill it out behind one of these cardboard barriers...


3) Bring it back and stuff it in a box...


4) Go play hockey and be merry.


They don't have any machines, any electronic crap, no butterfly ballots, no mistaken buttons pressed, no hanging chads, just an old fashioned X beside the name. Then they tear up each electoral district into NEIGHBOURHOODS, not counties, so every elementary school and church in most towns are used. And the ballot box you use is determined by your neighbourhood, so counting is a breeze.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hey560 Donating Member (105 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Because the election can't be stolen... Jeez so obvious ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's pretty much how they do it in Britain too
And I think that's a population of about 65,000,000 so we know it works with large numbers of people too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whitewomenforobama Donating Member (265 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. 'Cause Diebold can't make money off cardboard boxes?
I wish we did do it that way though. And I also wish we could all just voluntarily register at 18, and stay registered for life, updating only if we move to a different state. I can't see why we should have to go through this every 4 years. It's infuriating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beregond2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
28. I've never had to re-register except when I've moved.
What are you talking about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whitewomenforobama Donating Member (265 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-28-08 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #28
32. At least in Texas,
you have to re-register every time you move to a new county, and send in your registration card for correction if you move just within the county. During college, I moved at least every year, and that became kind of a pain. Most people move within a single county or state far more than they move between states, I just said it would be nice to only have to register when we move between states. I just wish there were an easier way, something so that we weren't subjected to all this madness every four years, with so much potential for people to get lost in the system. They can issue a single SSN or Selective Service number to a person to keep for their lifetime, and granted that's federal and doesn't depend on state of residency, but I wish there were something similarly easy for voter registration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beregond2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-28-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Oh, I see. I thoght you were saying you had to re-register even when you didn't move.
es, this country makes it all so much harder than it needs to be. I hope reforming the whole sytem will be one of the first priorities of the Democrats soon. Whatever happened to that bill Hillary was behind, that was described as the "gold standard" of election reform?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. Because it is a lot easier to count 10 million votes in one night instead of 100 million


But you're right... I'd rather they took the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. How many vote at each polling station?
The numbers should not matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. But you have the population to count them, too
All our voting counts are done by local volunteers and and a very efficient NON-PARTISAN Elections Canada department.

I think you have an even greater and more impressive volunteer operation in the US.

Why couldn't it be done?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwooldri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 10:18 PM
Original message
Hand counting works just fine.
And if there's a race to see who is the first to declare then the people organising the counting pull all the stops out to make sure they're counted accurately and in double-quick time. If you divide up each area into about 30,000 votes, you can get the vote counted and done in 45 minutes.

Mark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberalboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. Onemain difference is...
we don't vote on Amendments, Ballot Initiatives, retaining judges, approving bond issues, electing dog catcher, etc, etc, etc.

You vote for a representative and then let them do their job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
23. That's true
We have separate elections for National, Provincial and Municipal offices.

That way, the voting process is streamlined and easy for the voter to understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EastTennesseeDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. Why do we use leaf blowers instead of rakes?
They too piss everybody off, while not requiring the infinitesimally small extra amount of energy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
votetastic Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. Because hand-counting ballots is against the law
The "Help America Vote Act" forbids hand-counting ballots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Yep. Just like the "Clear Skies Initiative", "No Child Left Behind", "The Patriot Act"
Gods..I'll be so glad when the current cabal is gone (and hopefully prosecuted).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIdaho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. Dunno - why don't we have universal heath care like Canada? nm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. I like Oregon's the best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Thom Hartmann says it's alway been done like that in OR
And we never hear of major problems there, do we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Those crazy granola eating bastids sure can put together a decent voting system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. It's been this way as long as I can remember
Oh, and all the results are usually tabulated by midnight EST, with VERY few recounts and ZERO lawsuits.

I've always been astounded by the complexity of American voting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
13. For that matter, why don't we have a Parliamentary system
instead of the cumbersome absurdity we're stuck with?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Being able to question your leader every day in Paliament is a great benefit
Edited on Mon Oct-27-08 10:20 PM by Canuckistanian
Accountability is built into the Parliamentary system.

The leader of the country is also the undisputed leader of the party and can demand voting solidarity.

Far from being dictatory, it allows major bills to be passed smoothly without wasting time lobbying every single member.

And if a leader is unsatisfactory, the party can call for a leadership convention, where the leader can be thrown out on his/her ass, even in the middle of a term.

If you ask me, the US system is far more arbitrary and inflexible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-28-08 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #19
30. Yep
Also, the office of president, as defined in the American system, has too much power and too great an aura. It quickly became the superior branch of government, instead merely an administrative function, as intended. We've seen what can happen when the office is in the hands of a would-be dictator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
16. As Liberalboy said
we are voting for all sorts of other things besides the President that day. I'm in NM, I've already voted, and besides President, a Senator, a Representative, I also had state senator and representative to vote for, plus whether or not to retain a list of judges, about 8 ballot initiatives, most of which involved some sort of tax increase, and maybe a few other things. Oh, yeah, a Public Regulatory Commission Commissioner.

I do sort of wonder when other countries elect their other officials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberalboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Thanks Sheila
I remember the first political discussion I had with Canadians when I moved up here. I explained the electoral process and they would just shake their heads and look at me.

"Then why do you have elected officials?" they said "You vote for a person to handle all of those decisions, let them do their job."

Makes you think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
20. Are you from Canada?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quantass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
21. ...And the world continues to pass America by -- Bydie-Bye!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
22. I hate to burst anyone's bubble but I bet there was a lot of election fraud back in the day
The term used back then was "stuffing the ballot box" and that is what they did. Lots of fraud in the early 1900's and 1800's (Tammany Hall anyone?). I think voting got clean for a while after muckrakers turned their focus on voter fraud and voter supression but it started getting dirty again in 2000 and 2004 thanks to Karl Rove and co. I agree with paper ballots. We have optical scanners here in CT with paper ballots being filled out and then scanned. Computerized but with at least a paper trail. I like the ballot box better though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Elections used to be dirty in Canada in the 1800's
There were NO secret ballots. You had to stand on a stage and SHOUT your choice of candidate in front of your community.

Politicians used to buy votes with whiskey and cash on election days. It was a usually a brawling drunkfest with many fist fights and recriminations.

No wonder it was banned for women and children to be anywhere NEAR a polling place on election day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abumbyanyothername Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-28-08 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #22
34. Nice article in the New Yorker a couple of weeks ago
A congressional race from the mid 1800s was challenged on the allegation of vote improprieties. A voter testified that he was beaten over the head while on his way to the poll with his ballot. (His brother was actually shot dead during the same election.)

The Congress rejected the challenge, arguing, among other things, that a man of "ordinary courage" would have proceeded to the polls notwithstanding the attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
24. I do vote that way. But I don't play hockey afterwards. Would be very nice if
the whole nation also used paper and pencil, for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
25. Here is my ballot:
PDF:

http://www.dalcoelections.org/nov42008/Ballots/55.pdf

24 races on that ballot, and it's a short one.

Try counting THAT by hand. Nope, I don't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mossbeach Donating Member (95 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
27. Pretty Easy Solution for voting for multiple offices....
Just have different ballots, all number or color coded.

Another thing I saw...in Canada, at the polling plance, everything is black, white and grey. No party colors are allowed anywhere.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-28-08 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
29. Actually, that's how we do it in Cuyahoga County, Ohio
thanks to Jennifer Brunner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
expatriate Donating Member (853 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-28-08 02:09 AM
Response to Original message
31. I live in Australia.
Voting is the same here.

First, it is mandatory. You're eligible to vote, you register, and you must turn up at the polls. Don't turn up, pay a fine. They check you off the rolls when you go.

They make it easy. You can vote weeks in advance, or have an absentee ballot sent to you that is then returned via post. In my town of 7,000 people there are four or five polling places, and they are open every day for weeks before Election Day.

Elections are always held on a Saturday, when most people are off work. If you do work on Election Day, there are those weeks ahead of time where you can vote, and there are always the mailable absentee ballots.

Elections workers go to hospitals, nursing homes and shut-ins to give them the opportunity to vote. If you don't vote in Australia, it's not for lack of opportunity.

Paper ballots, you mark them with a pencil, you stuff them in a box. They are manually counted and tabulated and the results are in within a reasonable amount of time.

One person, one vote. No electoral college nonsense dating back to the 1700's. No machines, touchscreens, hanging chads. Simple and effective, it gives a lot of people employment during election season. Considering the unemployment in America, I would think that a manual voting system would work very well indeed, and give people work.

Being a dual national is interesting, because people are always asking me how the American voting system works. When I try to explain that each state does things its own way, and about machines and butterfly ballots and all the other crapola, they just stare. Then when I try to explain how the electoral college works, they give up and walk away, usually saying "no wonder it's such a mess every time they try to elect a President".

America needs one voting system and a simple one at that. So what if it takes a few more hours to get the votes counted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southernyankeebelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-28-08 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
35. You kidding
Because its to easy. The republicans can't find a way to steal the election every 4 yrs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-28-08 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
36. Can leave room for abuse
I can see someone hides a ballot, or something.

And, we have a lot more voters than Canada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-28-08 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
37. Because, like Canadian universal health care, it makes too much sense. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nyc 4 Biden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-28-08 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
38. IMO the best way to vote is to use...
Edited on Tue Oct-28-08 02:16 PM by nyc 4 Biden
Stephen Spoonamore'sidea. It works like this...after you vote, whether it be on a computer or something else, you get a receipt with a serial number on it. After the election there are lists printed in local papers or somewhere accessible to everyone, with all the local serial numbers in the different candidates columns. This way everyone can audit their own vote and it is still a secret ballot. Check out www.VelvetRevolution.us to find the video where he explains it himself.

ETA: I found the link
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_JdUZzgu9I&feature=related
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-28-08 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
39. And give up all this excitement? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC