Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McCain Campaign Falsely Claims Obama Described Court's Failure to Redistribute Wealth As "Tragedy"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 12:53 PM
Original message
McCain Campaign Falsely Claims Obama Described Court's Failure to Redistribute Wealth As "Tragedy"
The McCain campaign's efforts to portray Barack Obama as a closet socialist took a turn into the burlesque today, with the McCain camp falsely claiming that in a seven year old interview, Obama said that it was a "tragedy" that the Supreme Court hadn't redistributed wealth away from hard-working Americans.

The Obama interview in question is being pushed relentlessly today by the wingnuts, who are circulating this audio of it.

The McCain campaign just blasted out a quote from senior economics adviser Doug Holtz-Eakin hammering Obama. In the interview, Holtz-Eakin claimed, "Obama expressed his regret that the Supreme Court hadn't been more 'radical' and described as a 'tragedy' the Court's refusal to take up 'the issues of redistribution of wealth.'"

Holtz-Eakin asserted that this proves that Obama wants to take money "away from people who work for it" and give it to people "Obama believes deserves it." Apparently McCain himself is going to pick up this cudgel on the trail today, too.

But as usual, this latest attack rests on a complete falsehood.

What's more, take a look at the operative part of Obama's quote that includes the "tragedy" line:

One of the I think the tragedies of the Civil Rights movement was because the Civil Rights movement became so court focused I think that there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributive change and in some ways we still suffer from that.

http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/mccain_campaign_falsely_claims.php#more

I figured when Drudge posted this last night that McShame campaign would try to make this the Talking Point of the day. Is the MSM running with this? I'm stuck at work. I know Obama camp has already addressed this today from another DU thread here in GDP:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Alter Ego Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh my Lord. THAT's the quote?
It takes some serious verbal gymnastics to turn that into "OBAMA SEZ HE WILL REDISTRIBUTE YER WEALTH", considering he doesn't even talk about money there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Apparently the word "redistribute" automatically means "socialist", in any context.
Even if Obama said, "I would like to redistribute some campaign materials"--SOCIALIST!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdxmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. I don't know why people go to McPalin rallies. I would think that with
all the lies they tell, the probability of being struck down by lightning is huge!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4lbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yeah, this is part of that 2001 radio interview Obama gave that they are dredging up.
It was discussed last night here I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. That's why I was upset that Team Jordan was attacked by some
here for daring to post Drudge last night. IMHO that post was a heads up to us what the McShame camp and the wingnut media were going to try to pull off today.

And too often as we know the F'ing MSM goes right along with the falsehoods!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. What does the quote have to do with wealth?
Obama was talking about the distribution of political power, not money.

It seems pretty clear to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Education and legal services mostly:
from the article:

What's more, Obama legal adviser Cass Sunstein argues to Ben Smith that Obama was discussing "redistribution" in the context of a narrow legal discussion about civil rights, meaning he was discussing whether the courts should make the things that guarantee a social safety net -- education, welfare, and the like -- court-mandated rights.

Ironically, Sunstein points out, Obama was arguing that legislative action was a preferable vehicle for accomplishing such goals.

If McCain disagrees with Obama's argument that the courts aren't the primary place to accomplish such things, he should say so. It would certainly make news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I stand corrected
The RWers today are crowing about how Obama wants "activist judges" to "redistribute the wealth".

I must confess that I'm mystified the the statement "redistribute the wealth" has become a pejorative.

To me, that means making a more just economic system, with the poor and middle class taking a bigger share of the VAST wealth that already exists. NOT welfare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endthewar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. MSNBC has held back. Foxnews.com has it as their top story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. Here's the real Tragedy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC