Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Yes, Obama will probably win. But will he have a mandate?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
FlyingSquirrel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 09:44 PM
Original message
Yes, Obama will probably win. But will he have a mandate?
Duh, of course he will. Or should. But see, the Repukes like to play their little games and so they've attempted to deny three of the past four Democratic presidents the "mandate".

-----------------

In 1960, Kennedy carried four fewer states than Nixon, won less than 50% of the popular vote, and many claimed he did not even win the popular vote (he won by about 113,000).

In 1976, Carter carried four fewer states than Ford, so many Repukes sneered at him for that as well.

In 1992 Clinton failed to win 50% of the vote due to Perot's independent run. Funny, the Repugs didn't have a problem with it when Nixon only got 43.4% of the vote in 1968 thanks to George Wallace.

In 1996 Clinton once again failed to win 50% - he got 49.24% - as again Perot entered the race. Sorry pal, no mandate.

In 2000, W. lost the popular vote to Gore but did win ten extra states (counting FL); despite OBVIOUSLY not having a mandate, he governed as though he did and went on to completely ignore the rest of us.

In 2004, W. won the popular vote, got more than 50%, and won 12 more states than Kerry. Though many of us feel they stole it again, the general Democratic public - while depressed - was not up in arms.

-----------------

The bar is set high for Democratic presidents. In order for a clear mandate to be seen, in addition to winning the EV they must do the following:

(1) Clearly take more than 50% of the popular vote; and

(2) Carry a majority of states

-----------------

By those standards, Obama may soon become the first Democratic president since LBJ to measure up.

(1) He is hovering right at 50% vs 43% for McCain, with no strong third-party candidate to take away votes. If half the remaining undecideds go to Obama, with 2% to other candidates, Obama should win at least 52% of the popular vote.

(2) He has a clear, strong lead (6.5% or greater) in 24 states (plus D.C.); he has a smaller lead (0.1 to 4.4%) in seven other states, and also has an outside chance in at least two other states. Trends are going his way so far, and he should have no trouble winning at least a simple majority in the state race.

As far as EV goes, Obama stands a very good chance of winning at least 359 which would mean he had won over twice as many as McCain. Clinton won 370 and 379, but remember that wasn't enough for the Repukes because he didn't win the popular vote. Obama should easily exceed W's totals of 271 and 286.

-----------------

This is why the Repukes are really freaking out. Obama stands to become the first president since LBJ that they can't somehow find fault with, as far as his numbers go. It'll be a clear mandate for our platform and Obama's agenda.

And it'll be a thing of beauty.

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DemzRock Donating Member (824 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. W lost in 2000, but acted like he got 90% of the vote. So what the heck, sure. Mandate. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. "Mandate" is a word that only sounds like it carries meaning. nt
Edited on Sun Oct-26-08 09:46 PM by Occam Bandage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I agree. Who the hell started the constant usage of the word, mandate? Some Repuke? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlyingSquirrel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Almost certainly it was a Repuke. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I think you're right! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Bush/McCane has freaked America no end...Palin is adding to the GOP Pain.
All of a sudden....people are looking at the horrid results under the GOP Leadershop....and it sucks...

Then, the People are barraged by daily BS CRAP from the GOP...very tiring....and the Negativity is overwhelming in its stench.

Buh Bye GOP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. Obama's mandate will seem huge for the simple fact that he will not be facing a unified opposition
On Nov 5th The Republicans will start tearing itself apart and it will therefore be something like this


Obama 55%

McCain supporters 10%
Palin supporters 15%
Establishment Republicans 10%
Economic conservatives 10%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Puzzler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. Let's see...
... Bush "won" (or lost) by the tiniest of vote margins, and yet he had a "mandate" to pursue a radical RW agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
9. Given All Of The Rethugs Who Are Crossing Over
A mandate it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. if he wanta a mandate, that's fine with me - but Michelle might object
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. .
:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lord Helmet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
11. his mandate is to un-fuck the mess
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lin_e65 Donating Member (31 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
13. Obama's Mandate
It doesn't matter what the republidevils claim. Obama's mandate comes from us. It's up to us to use the telephone, the mail, the email and let the washingtonians know where we stand and in what direction we want this country to go in. Do you think all the dems are going to back Obama? Remember, the mind set in Washinton is "me first". That has to stop. It's the people first and we have to remind them of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlyingSquirrel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Very good point, and welcome to DU!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
15. Obama and Biden will set out to do
what they were elected to do and the repukes can go take a flying fuck at a doughnut ..like they always do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlyingSquirrel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. 60... 60... 60...
Dreamin'

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC