Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Buying your own bullshit?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 03:17 PM
Original message
Buying your own bullshit?
Was the disastrous choice of Sarah Palin as McCain's VP running mate a case of Republican campaign 'strategizers' buying their own bullshit?

For months the Right Wing Radio Hate Fest's Operation Chaos pretended that they were wrecking our chances in november by creating the long contest between Obama and Clinton (they weren't, the contest was real enough without their negligible or nonexistent 'help'.) And their endgame in this nonsense was their real enough but pathetic PUMA Stunt wherein supposedly vast numbers of disaffected Clinton women were leaving the party to vote for the folks who would transform The Handmaid's Tale from fiction to fact. The idea was to create this fictional mass exit, from message boards, live on tv, and on other media outlets, in order to manufacture a factional breakup in our party. We saw it in action here on DU.

The otherwise inexplicable choice of the most unqualified major party vice presidential candidate in modern history is perhaps best explained by the strategizer's believing that there really were vast covens of disaffected Clintonistas who would be sucked into their world of rightwing whacko misogyny by putting Governor Palin on the ticket. They created a fictional narrative to draw in confused (and obviously in their opinion massively stupid) women voters, and promptly fell for their own nonsense, actually believing that there was this demographic of disaffected former Clinton supporters who were theirs for the picking if they just put up a women on the ticket.

If they weren't so totally incompetent they would be truly dangerous.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
iceman66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. They are dangerous, because despite all that
they are pretty competent at stealing elections!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC