Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A bush babble point that's been bothering me for a few weeks...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 08:56 PM
Original message
A bush babble point that's been bothering me for a few weeks...
First I have to admit that when I heard bush say it, my brain rejected it outright. It made no sense. Why would he say such a bass-ackwards thing? There was no logical handle by which to connect it to the overall structure of concepts, and my mind wanted to gloss right over it to something more sensible. But it now stands out quite clearly as an unresolved dissonance, and I realize it's been irking me for a while.

Here's the quote -- and he's repeated it often enough to make it a talking point, of sorts: "Be careful of these folks who travel around the country making all these big promises, and say, oh, don't worry, we'll pay for it by taxing the rich. You know how that goes. The rich hires accountants and lawyers and you get stuck with the bill."
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/08/20040817-6.html

OK, this is absolutely excoriable on several levels, and I think it merits its own TV ad.

1) bush outright admits that the tax code is gamed by the wealthy -- I'm certainly willing to agree with him on this, but...
2) rather than offer legislation ammending the tax code to ensure that the wealthy pay their fair share, bush proposes continued tax cutting -- INSANITY! What the hell is he thinking?
3) bush's tax cuts benefit, primarily, the extremely wealthy -- according to the CBO study, the tax burden has shifted significantly from the upper to the middle brackets since 2001, as the bulk of the giveaways are in unearned income tax cuts

So not only does he misrepresent the purpose of a progressive tax structure (and sufficiently so or not, the FIT was at least somewhat progressive during the '90s), he manages to gloatingly sell his audience on the idea of the rich continuing to game the tax code. This is so counterintuitive that my poor brain couldn't digest it at first. The more I think about it, though, the more this seems like a liability that should be used as a bludgeon by the 527s to whack his smirking ass all the way back to Crawford. It's hugely inconsistent, very immoral, and should be a slam-dunk for the Kerry squad.

Of course, it's too much to ask that the whore media address this issue frankly, so we leave it up to the Kerry campaign and associated organizations to make this point. BUT IT SHOULD BE MADE, repeatedly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mr_hat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. He's just a guy you'd have a beer with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. Well, I might throw a beer at him
Why do the republicans harp on how nice it'd be to have a beer with him when they know he's a "recovering" alcoholic who shouldn't be anywhere near beer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Actually he first said this weeks ago, but has been REPEATING it on
the campaign trail, so obviously it's an INTENDED talking point that they are not even ashamed of. The first time he said something like "You know how the rich is, they have accountants. And you know what that means--they dodge, you pay!"

So mind boggling it defies description. Basically acknowledging that the system favors the rich (which he and Dick are), and that we're not going to do anything to change it!

Needs to be hit HARD by the campaign. I had been meaning to post about this, the third time or so I saw him say it on TV but I forgot. Thanks for reminding me with this post!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. and people smoke pot anyway......
might as well do away with THOSE laws too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Your onto something: a crime analogy might be a good way to illustrate it.
especially since this is damn near criminal behavior to begin with.

"Most felons only serve a fraction of their sentences, so we'll just have reduced sentences for felons."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I have the same problem! I forget it too, I even WANT to forget it
> I had been meaning to post about this, the third time or so
> I saw him say it on TV but I forgot.

It's so blatantly repulsive, it begs to be forgotten. It's like the "Somebody Else's Problem Field" from the Hitchhiker's Guide series, where something can be made invisible by simply being too ridiculous for the rational mind to deal with. I can only presume that the people applauding this line are either

1) rich jerks who understand the underlying code quite well or
2) "ordinary" people getting reamed by his policies who can't comprehend what he's saying and just like the way he talks

How can anyone sobre approve of what bush is suggesting?!?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. I think bushco wants us to think 'Kerry rich, Edwards a lawyer' THEY
'weasel out'

B/C just 'good ole boys aranching and kicking back with a beer'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A_Possum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. He's floating a flat tax
He wants to spread the idea that we should get rid of accountants and all just pay a flat rate. Wouldn't that be cool?


(Personal admission: I was once in favor of a flat tax, about 20 years ago when shelters were running so rampant that everything was screwy and just filling out a 1040 was making me crazy. Took me awhile to figure out how unfair that would be. So I have to admit that it isn't self-evident ro everyone that a progressive tax is a good thing. Younger people may need to be educated in how cruelly regressive flat taxes like sales tax etc can be.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. i hear a lot of people go to a flat tax
dont realize that per dollar the poorer person is being taxed more in reality. rich people would love a flat tax
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Yeah, let him float that idea during the debates, he'll get flayed alive
I do believe he bounced that one around during a talk once, and his press team had to spin like mad to get him out of it. It'd be a pleasure to see Sen. Kerry step on the flat tax cockroach.

"Mr. Bush wants me to save $70,000 per year on income taxes! Now that's a very nice gesture, but I'd rather shift the burden of taxation back to people like myself and away from the middle classes who form the backbone of the consumer economy..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. Economic terrorism
Edited on Sun Sep-05-04 10:33 PM by Stevie D
Bush* acknowledges that the tax cuts benefit the rich; even more importantly, he acknowledges that we should be somehow GRATEFUL that these cuts are doing such a great job stimulating the economy and creating jobs, even though by every measure the U.S. is losing jobs at an alarming and unsustainable rate.

I don't think there is any question that the Bush Crime Family and all their associated criminal hangers-on intend to run the deficit up so high that the federal government goes bankrupt, then every state and local juridiction is next. Then who do Joe Sixpack and his wife and kids depend on for sustenance?

Economic terrorism.

I hate these bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. If Bush believes the rich dodge their taxes, why not raise their rate
to 99% and test the theory? :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bernardo de La Paz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
11. Bush advocates laying back and accepting tax rape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shockingelk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
12. "soft bigotry"
Not expecting the government to enforce out tax laws is the soft bigotry of low expectations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
15. I too, was puzzeled by that statement. Bush's "too cute by half" swagger
is what will cost him in the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC