Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What if you could make a 1/4 million a year, but only if you agreed to pay a higher tax rate.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 08:03 PM
Original message
What if you could make a 1/4 million a year, but only if you agreed to pay a higher tax rate.
Would you do it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. DEAL! And I'd pick lettuce for it to boot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I'd NOT be a plumber and buy the imaginary business!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 06:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
39. Some of those farmers should pimpslap McCain asking, "Where's my $50/hr, bitch?"
McCain DID say he couldn't find someone to work for that wage farming. Christ, wish I made that much in a day. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. What, and give up the life of luxury we live on $30K a year???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. People making over a 1/4 a million a year and complaining about a tax increase...
I don't think they realize how fortunate they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iceman66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. Even worse are people like the infamous "Joe"
who only make $40K per year but complain about a tax increase on those making $250K.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. Yeah, "I'll be rich someday" guys protecting their future hoard.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #16
38. That's called "Horatio Alger".
Or:

"Don't mess with the wealthy. I'm going to BE wealthy someday, and I'll WANT all those advantages!"

:eyes:

Ah, the deluded working class Repukes and their silly beliefs . . . Bless their hearts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. I would consider it my duty
as a citizen. It would be a way to pay back the nation for the ability to gain such an income. (BTW, I make around 20K and don't grouse about paying taxes even at that rate, and for the same reason.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blondiegrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. Fuck, yeah! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crazy_vanilla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. sure, more arugula money
Edited on Sun Oct-19-08 08:10 PM by crazy_vanilla
;-) That would more than triple our current income. Dreaming now ... sigh. I wouldn't mind paying higher taxes at all, since the net would still be much higher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. In a heartbeat.
And I'd pay 2/3 in taxes if that meant we could get universal health care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'd be willing to pay 65% taxes. I'd still come out ahead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. Yeah. A FEW PERCENT higher.
And besides, since that's above the ceiling for Self-Employment tax (FICA) withholding, the total percentage taken out is substantially less than for a self-employed person who makes under 100k per year and has to pay about 15% for Social Security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. And it's adjusted gross anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
12. I'm not sure what I'd do with that kind of money
My wife and I make less than $30k/yr. We could pay 40% in taxes and the 150K left over would pay off the house, buy us both new cars, pay off the $1500 we owe on credit cards, and still leave us over $100K
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
13. In a second.
I'd love to. At $250,000, I could go as high as 60-70%. That would be a huge jump for me, and still make me very comfortable for my portion of the U.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Versailles Donating Member (384 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
14. For 250K a year or more...
I'd GLADLY pay 50% taxes on my income. When I was teaching I made under 30K after 8 years. It didn't even come close to paying for the anti-depressants I needed to go on, the therapy sessions my administrators, parents, and students forced me into, the ulcers I developed, or the COUNTLESS hours I spent grading papers so that students could look at them for 10 seconds to see their grade then toss them in the trash.

Now after what essentially mounted to a stress related breakdown, I decided to change careers and the economy and the job market tanks. I'm back in school, but my fiancee and I are trying to scrape by on about 35k since I can't find anything in this area.

Sorry. I'll stop my ranting now. On a positive note, I got to see Obama today in Fayetteville, NC. I've never been inspired by any politician until today. Incredibly...and hearing the PIE story live is great!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RayOfHope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
15. Yes. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greblc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
17. lay it on me!
hell yes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
18. Hmm gee, I'll have to think about it
On one hand I would make more money, on the other hand I'll make more money.

Tough choice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberadorHugo Donating Member (557 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
19. What an asinine question...
States that use progressive income taxation divide these taxes into brackets, with each bracket fulling within one's income taxed at a different. The first $249,998 dollars you make are going to be taxed the exact same way regardless of whether you make $249,999, $250,000, or $25,000,000 in a given year. So long as the marginal tax rate above $250,000 is low enough to make it work the effort, people will still work for and still accept renumeration of amounts well in excess of $250,000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
20. Of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fizzgig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
21. hell, i'd be happy with half that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
22. Gladly. It's all about NET AFTER-TAX income. Anything beats my pittance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquamarina Donating Member (772 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
23. Sign me up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PolNewf Donating Member (388 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
24. It is only an extra 3% on earnings above $250,000
I'm pretty sure most people do not understand progressive tax rates. If you make $250,001 you don't pay an extra 3% on your total earnings. You pay an extra 3 cents, 3% extra on income in that bracket.

Lets take someone who will get hit by Obama's tax plan making $300,000 a year. They will pay $50,000 x 0.03 = $1500 extra. If paid bi-weekly they will see 58 dollars less per check. Most people bringing home ~$7000 bi-weekly are not going to notice that $58.

You will always make more with a higher salary unless they make a 100% tax bracket. So your question is a no brainer for those making less than $250,000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kat45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
26. Absolutely!
A no-brainer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheap_Trick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
27. Sure, it'd only be a few less lattes.......
A sacrifice I'm willing to make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwooldri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
28. Even at a flat tax of 75% total (fed, state etc) I'd do it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jab105 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
29. IF I make $251,000 per year...
then, I would ONLY pay 39% on $1000 (that amount over $250,000)...
This is what those idiots don't understand...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. Heck, even a lot of people here don't seem to understand the concept of "marginal tax rates"
It's freakin' pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dem2theMax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
30. Just show me where to sign!
I wouldn't know what to do with that much money. I could actually get my tooth fixed!
I could buy my Mom hearing aids. My car is 19 years old. I could buy a 10 year old Ford Focus and have it converted to all-electric.

I could get my tooth fixed and finally eat on the left side of my mouth again. (That's the big one - the tooth.) ;)

Taxes? Hell yeah, I'd be HAPPY to pay more taxes..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serrano2008 Donating Member (363 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
32. I'd do it with an 86% tax rate
WOO HOO!!! I'd still make $35,000/year after taxes - more than now.

Not to mention that I'd max out my 401K tax free and get company match. Damn, sign me up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
33. I do, and I do
I survived 39% under Bill Clinton. I could do it again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hellataz Donating Member (804 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 02:30 AM
Response to Original message
34. Hell yeah! Who wouldn't?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 05:00 AM
Response to Original message
35. Absolutely
Edited on Mon Oct-20-08 05:03 AM by quaker bill
It is like asking if I won a million dollars on the lottery, would I mind paying $350,000 in taxes on it? Yes, one could avoid the high tax bill by not winning, but I would be much happier to win, pay the taxes, and pocket the $650,000 remainder.

Regardless of tax rates, more money is always more money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 05:25 AM
Response to Original message
36. Betcherass!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
37. isnt it only like a 3% increase over 250k.... ? what is theriggin big friggin deal. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC