Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How can all 435 House seats be up for grabs?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 06:41 PM
Original message
How can all 435 House seats be up for grabs?
Aren't the 2 year terms staggered?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nope, they are all up for re-election
Edited on Sat Oct-18-08 06:43 PM by Hokie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TACstrat Donating Member (190 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not in the House. Senate is staggered in thirds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
27. I actually think each state should have three senators and have one election every 2 years
It wouold be far more representative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #27
38. You do realize that would help the GOP more than us, right?
Isn't it bad enough that states like Alaska, with 700,000 people, already have TWO senators?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 06:54 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. I am not sure 150 would be distributes any differently
Remember that the whole idea behind having two houses was to balance the needs for citizen representation with the recognition of state autonomy and equality as well as a hedge against the volatile passion of the electorate which the house is intended to reflect.


Bicameralism is actually a very smart constitutional mechanism. I just think every state should have the ability to speak as a whole every two years.

Equality among states may seem a bit anachronistic given the advent of radio and television, air travel and the internet, but if the senate was based on population rather than borders it would be terribly disenfranchising to states like Delaware and Rhode Island and Vermont and New Hampshire as well as Idaho and Alaska.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 03:23 AM
Response to Reply #39
47. The problem is seniority and chairmanships.
Senators who are from safe little states can stay in power a long, long time. Given the number of small states with Republican senators, such a system would allow them a better shot at running things for their party.

I see your point, however, about involving every state every two years, and I do like that.

I wouldn't mind seeing 150 US senators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. No, they'd have to have elections EVERY year to stagger two year terms.
Right? :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yeah, and I thought we did..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Please tell me your history teachers in High School were better than that....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. I thought we had house races ever year, sue me.
I understand the terms are 2-years, but I assumed they were staggered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBear Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #17
30. In your defense...
It does seem that some states and localities have their big elections off year. This is generally a way to ensure low voter turnout and a cake walk for incumbents. You may have mistaken one of those elections for an off year congressional one....

I'm just sayn...

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
21. Sure seems like we do lately. We have ANOTHER big election in '09 in New York,
then right into the '10 midterms!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. If they were we would be having congressional elections every year.
We don't.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madaboutharry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. This is the major complaint of members of
The House of Representatives. The claim that all they ever do is run for re-election due to the relatively short two year term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GrizzlyMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
25. It's a fair complaint IMO
Because near as I can tell, that's how it ends up, especially if you're not in a safe district. There are congress folks on both sides of the aisle who face brutally tough opponents every cycle. I would imagine that would do a lot to impede any kind of actual work for the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenbriar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. No they are not
it is every two years for every congress critter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. No
All members of the House are elected every two years. The only seats not up for grabs are those that are uncontested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. In even number years, about 1/3 Senate and all of House...
...get voted on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. Dude... how do you stagger 2-YEAR terms when the elections are every two years?

Math much?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. I has nothing to do with math. I erroneously thought a portion of the House was votged on every fall
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #19
34. Ummm. Yeah.
Moving on...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
12. No
Staggering, isn't it?

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. Time for a INS citizens test ...

Take your time there are only 100 questions
http://usgovinfo.about.com/blinstst.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
14. That is our answer to a parliamentary no confidence type of election.....
Every two years we have an election in the main branch of the legislature as a sort of confidence vote. Great idea the founders had.

Too bad we have to wait four years for the executive branch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
15. I used to think House terms should be four years,
and then I remembered it would take twice as long to get facists like Michele Bachmann out of there. :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. Nope, Representatives get elected every two years...
Granted, a lot of Congresscritters skate through their reelections because they represent safe districts - very red or very blue, and in many cases, the opposition party doesn't even bother to put someone on the ballot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
18. Somebody slept through their 7TH grade civics classes
Tsk, Tsk, Tsk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
racaulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
20. .
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
22. Wow......
Come, we go drink.... :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elfin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
23. As a former Civics and History teacher I cringe at your query --
but then I remind myself that these subjects are now relegated to "optional" in many school districts.

The reason for the ENTIRE House up every two years is part of the wisdom and design of the Founders to make at least one body of the Legislature be more immediately in tune with the populace at large. On the other hand, the Senate with its longer 6 year staggered terms is supposed to be more insulated from transient whims and have the longer term interests of the nation in mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Isn't it sad that Civics are no longer being taught?
The need to reinstate Civics as a required course is very evident...especially if you have ever seen Jay-Walking on the Jay Leno Show..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madaboutharry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Both my children have had
year long civics courses in middle school. And this was in different districts in different states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #24
32. I wish we would all be taught..
civics. My education for the first 9 years consisted of Jesus, Joseph, and Mary. The next four years I specialized in drinking and drugging, which I made an occupation of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
28. Someon here needs to learn to use...
THE GOOGLE!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
29. how could 2 year terms be staggered?
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
31. if a member of congress serves for 5 years they get some type of pension, all the more
reason to get Bachmann out now,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
33. You flunked junior high civics, didn't you.
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
35. Please tell me you are only fourteen years old
and so are young enough not to have noticed this until just now.

On the other hand, my ex several years back (we'd been married about ten years by then so he was about 35) looked at me oddly in mid-November and said, "Thanksgiving is on a Thursday AGAIN this year?" Somehow he'd missed that little detail all those years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
36. How could two year terms be staggered and still have elections
during even numbered years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
37. House elections are every two years, with the whole House being up ...
... for reelection. (Thus "Presidential year" elections and "mid-term" elections.)

Senate races, with their 6-year terms, are staggered.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
machI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
40. Are you making some kind of implication about the way Incumbents hold onto their seats
The system is setup to protect the Incumbent. A challenger has an uphill path to follow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demodonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
41. NO. ( Geesh we need to start teaching Civics in this country again. ) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
42. HAHAHAHAHAHA! Good one!
Wait, were you serious?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endthewar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
43. Palin, is that you?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
44. Seriously, how old are you?
Is this your first election?

Are civics classes really not taught anymore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuiderelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. Either he's just turned 18, or he doesn't value his vote much, since he doesn't vote every year.
I'll give him the benefit of the doubt, and assume he just turned 18.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
45. I was taught: there are no dumb questions, only dumb answers.
I found this source to be helpful when I was trying to figure out who was running when..

it shows the election years of each 1/3, or "class" of the Senate.

http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/reference/two_column_table/Class_II.htm

I hope you won't let rude people stop you from asking questions.:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 04:08 AM
Response to Reply #45
48. I agree
I give the poster credit for asking, and then replying while being ridiculed.

There's plenty of conventional wisdom that is more off base than that question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 04:23 AM
Response to Original message
49. Un. Freakin. Real.
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC