Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Am I nuts for thinking these non-scientific polls (Scholastic, 7-11, Amazon) are onto something?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 02:24 PM
Original message
Am I nuts for thinking these non-scientific polls (Scholastic, 7-11, Amazon) are onto something?
Edited on Sat Oct-18-08 02:52 PM by Drunken Irishman
Hear me out.

All these polls based on mask sales, coffee cups, kid votes and cookies were right on the button in 2004, some even closer than the real polls.

And what do they all have in common this election? Obama is winning, but he's not only winning, he's winning by almost nearly the same margin.

http://www.rbanet.com/2008cookiepoll.htm#Results">The Cookie Poll



In 2004, the election cookie poll accurately predicted the next president of the United States - President George W. Bush.



Right now, Obama leads 58-42.

http://www.7-eleven.com/">The 7-11 Poll



The 2004 7-Election results tracked identically with published national election results: 51% for George W. Bush and 49% for John Kerry.



Right now, Obama leads 60-40, or almost the same numbers as the cookie poll, which predicted Bush in 2004.

http://www.amazon.com/Put-Your-Party-on-Your-Face/meters/A2JPIXA6Y3NESG/">The Amazon Dot Com Mask Poll



The 2004 Amazon results showed Bush beating Kerry.



Right now, Obama leads 54-46. Obviously a bit closer than the above polls, but still around the same number (above 50% for Obama and McCain struggling in the 40s).

http://www2.scholastic.com/browse/article.jsp?id=3750501">The Kids' Vote



In the 2004 Scholastic Election Poll, George W. Bush received 52 percent
of the votes and the Democratic contender, John F. Kerry, received 47 percent.



The 2008 poll shows Obama winning 57-39, or almost the same margin as the above polls. In 2004, the poll was almost exactly spot on, as were the above numbers four years ago.

Am I nuts or is there a trend here? I'm starting to think maybe the polls are underestimating the support, while maybe these non-scientific polls, for whatever reason, are getting a better idea of the national trend.

Who knows, just thought it was interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kirby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yep, you are nuts. Have another drink... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bad Thoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Kids' Poll is a mirror into American Homes
Children pick up on the positive and negative things that parents say about candidates, and tend to reflect them in their own opinions. It may not translate into real votes, but clearly Obama has a positive image.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. It is indeed interesting
It will be fun to find out how close these polls are to what really happens this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. check out this site, it's very comprehensive and interesting...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msallied Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think there are too many variables that aren't accounted for here...
However, I think that a pattern is definitely obvious. The Scholastic Kids poll, in particular, is useful because it's only been wrong twice since its inception, and both of those elections were among the closest in history (1948, 1960). Now, it only accounts for a certain demographic. The parents of these kids, whom the votes are likely most reflecting, are going to likely be between the ages of 20 and 40. That's an assumption. Anyway, it wouldn't likely account for people older than that, who make up the other half of the electorate. But rest assured that if Obama is pulling in the middle-age and younger crowd, and he's pulling in a decent percentage of the electorate, then he's in a very good position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. Mask Sales Might be a Contrary Indicator
A lot of people might be buying McCain and Palin masks this Halloween because they are so scary!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abbiehoff Donating Member (356 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. Kid's vote at 57 - 49??
seems like about 106 percent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressiveforever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. It was actually 57-39 with 45 other
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VADem11 Donating Member (783 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. It's actually 57-39
plus 4 percent for others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quantass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Math and Science are taught very well in U.S. schools
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Yeah, I guess I'm stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Sorry, I meant to type 39, but hit 49.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livedemocarticordie Donating Member (209 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. The Kids Poll with Scholastic is: Obama 57, McDickus 39
Edited on Sat Oct-18-08 02:55 PM by livedemocarticordie
.. It's the one to watch., They have been doing it for decades and it is pretty consistent on being correct because young children parrot their children. The adult vote is mirrored. The Bradley Effect and other effects are diminished.

From SCHOLASTIC:

It's official. At least for the kids! The Scholastic Presidential Election Poll results are in: Democratic nominee Senator Barack Obama won with 57 percent of the vote, to 39 percent for Republican nominee Senator John McCain.

The poll was open to kids from grades 1 to 12 in Scholastic News and Junior Scholastic magazines. Almost 250,000 (a quarter of a million) kids voted by paper ballot or online at www.scholastic.com/news. The poll closed on October 10.

Since 1940, the results of the student vote have mirrored the outcome of the general election all but twice: In 1948, kids voted for Thomas E. Dewey over Harry S. Truman. In 1960, more students voted for Richard M. Nixon than for John F. Kennedy. In 2000, a majority of student voters chose George W. Bush, mirroring the Electoral College result, but not the result of the popular vote.


.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NHDEMFORLIFE Donating Member (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
12. Bits of anecdotal evidence
These polls are just as valuable as the stories about "My crazy Republican uncle who is voting for Obama." They aren't scientific, and they are not useful for projecting accurate results, but they are reasonable as anecdotal proof that there is a shifting in political thinking out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC