|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
wndycty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:43 PM Original message |
The CHICAGO TRIBUNE: Barack Obama for president (Very conservative paper) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firedupdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
1. Good! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 06:15 PM Response to Reply #1 |
56. The final paragraphs are a must read... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bryan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
2. The TRIBUNE?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
3. HOLY SHIT!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grace0418 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
4. Okay THAT just knocked my fucking socks off! I CANNOT BELIEVE THE CHICAGO TRIBUNE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
5. GET OUT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TragedyandHope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
6. Thanks for the good news! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
steve2470 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:47 PM Response to Original message |
7. THIS IS AMAZING, THE CHICAGO TRIBUNE ??????? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grace0418 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:48 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. I know, right? I seriously cannot believe it. Those who don't know the track record of this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:52 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. Wasn't their last endorsement of a Democrat in the 1800's? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:53 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. They NEVER Endorsed A Dem For President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:55 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. In 1872, they endorsed Horace Greeley |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wndycty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:54 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. It was never |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:55 PM Response to Reply #11 |
21. Last Time They Endorsed a Non-Republican for President - 1872! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:56 PM Response to Reply #21 |
28. According to The Ed, They NEVER Have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:57 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. I had to look it up, that was the last time they endorsed a NON-Republican |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 03:00 PM Response to Reply #29 |
38. Cool, Thanks For The Info |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkism (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:47 PM Response to Original message |
8. Awesome! I was waiting to see what they'd do... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ErinBerin84 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:47 PM Response to Original message |
9. haha...in your face, jill zuckman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkism (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:49 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. When they start coming in, read the comments. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:48 PM Response to Original message |
10. HOLY. FUCKING. SHIT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
13. WOW! That's great! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
14. OMG! This is really significant. Several GOP newspapers have come out for Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:55 PM Response to Reply #14 |
27. It worries me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:57 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Deleted message |
brentspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 03:02 PM Response to Reply #30 |
43. Uh, yeah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 03:05 PM Response to Reply #43 |
49. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gidney N Cloyd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:58 PM Response to Reply #27 |
32. Or they've figured out Obama's least likely to tank the whole economy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grace0418 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:59 PM Response to Reply #27 |
36. No, they know they'll lose subscribers if they choose another Republican. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stolivodka (411 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:50 PM Response to Original message |
15. Amazing! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
16. I'll bet they didn't want to lose subscribers and advertising $$ if they chose unwisely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
18. Unbelievable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:55 PM Response to Original message |
22. Psssst...he's from Chicago! I'm glad the Trib figured that out. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grace0418 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:57 PM Response to Reply #22 |
31. Well, I wasn't holding my breath. They never figured out in all these years that MOST OF CHICAGO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:55 PM Response to Original message |
24. Now that is surprising. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gidney N Cloyd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:55 PM Response to Original message |
25. Online only so far? I didn't crack the morning paper. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drunken Irishman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:55 PM Response to Original message |
26. It's the first time since 1872 that the Tribune has endorsed a Democratic candidate for president. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:58 PM Response to Reply #26 |
34. Nope, NEVER Endorsed A Dem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 03:02 PM Response to Reply #26 |
41. Horace Greeley wasn't a Democrat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:58 PM Response to Original message |
33. Wow. I'm impressed. I gotta pick up a copy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:59 PM Response to Original message |
35. Oh Nose. This will cause some gnashing of teeth amongst the freeptards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FVZA_Colonel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
37. How widely read is the Tribune in Northwest Indiana? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
39. wow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hope And Change (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
40. K & R! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nailzberg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
42. 161 years, never a Dem for POTUS. Looks like the Cubbies own the longest streak in town now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jersey Devil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
44. We are proud to add Barack Obama's name to Lincoln's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrattotheend (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
45. LOL, I just wrote 5 minutes ago that I wondered who the Tribune would endorse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fluffdaddy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
46. This is big |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkism (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
47. Haha! Look at the freepers in the comments! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fluffdaddy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 03:06 PM Response to Reply #47 |
50. Love it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nailzberg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 03:08 PM Response to Reply #47 |
51. The freepers out of their gourds: "The Lib Trib"? Puleeze! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkism (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 03:09 PM Response to Reply #47 |
52. This one is a hoot... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RichardRay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
48. Comments from their web site: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
steve2470 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 03:10 PM Response to Reply #48 |
53. "Do I see porcine aviation outside my window?" !!!! hahahahahahahahaha nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wndycty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 03:24 PM Response to Reply #53 |
54. That was funny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Martin Eden (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 05:57 PM Response to Original message |
55. Never thought I'd see it in my lifetime |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mopinko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
57. ok, but the paper was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 06:32 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC