|
Now that the debates are over, I'm just going to do my core dump about stuff that has bugged me all along:
1) We Are Winning The War In Iraq!
Of all the things that kept coming up, this was the bit I got most frustrated by. Obama never addressed the question of whether the surge was working or not; he always moved back to the decision to enter the war. I'm not saying that wasn't a good tactic, just that I would have liked to see *someone* say this: The fact that violence in Iraq has decreased since the surge does not mean that we are now finally victorious--or, even more infuriating, that we should all have known all along that we would eventually be victorious, which is what McCain is implying by making Obama's opposition to the surge an issue. A strategy that 'works' only after tens of thousands of civilians have been killed, the middle class has been destroyed, the country has become a magnet for fundamentalist terrorist organizations, and violence has been the only law of the land for years on end is not a winning strategy. To say that the surge has "worked" and that we are now "winning" is like saying that Bush's Hurricane Katrina strategy is "working" because three years after Katrina's landfall there are no longer bodies floating in the streets.
2) Same Shit, Different Debate.
This is something both candidates did that drove me nuts: recycling the exact same answers to the exact same questions across all 3 debates. I understand why they do it, but it does not inspire confidence, and it makes the whole process of having multiple debates kind of pointless. I don't think we got anything out of #3 that didn't come out of #1 or #2 except for a few more chances for McCain to ramble on about Bill Ayers and Joe the Plumber.
3) The Middle Class
Does anyone in this country really know what "middle class" means any more? To hear politicians talk it sounds like the "middle class" includes, basically, anybody who has a job and a family. And yet at the same time policies directed at the middle class all seem to be oriented toward a more restrictive definition of middle class which assumes, among other things, homeownership and the expectation of a college education for all the family's children. If you're a single woman working as a housekeeper at a hotel, raising two kids, living in a tiny rented apartment, and focusing on making it to next week with enough money to buy groceries rather than on buying a house or sending your kids to college, are you middle class? If so, why? And if not, how come nobody ever talks about you and what you need?
I get that Obama's concern for the "middle class," however it's defined, is sufficient to distinguish him from McCain, who apparently only cares about the magnate & mogul class. Still. I cannot help thinking that it's a problem that nobody ever acknowledges that for a lot of working Americans, a recognizably "middle class" existence is still pretty far out of their reach no matter what kind of tax cuts they get handed.
4) McCain's Tongue.
I really did not need to see that.
Ah well, it'll all be over soon,
The Plaid Adder
|