|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:20 AM Original message |
SCOTUS Decision was PER CURIAM - TAKE THAT FREEPERS! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BanzaiBonnie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
1. What decision? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:23 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. BRUNNER v. OHIO REPUBLICAN PARTY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberadorHugo (557 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
2. Opus Dei Antonio is pissed at this party... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
4. WHAT decision???????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
steve2470 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:25 AM Original message |
this one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:25 AM Response to Original message |
5. get out! Awesome! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CitizenLeft (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:25 AM Response to Original message |
6. I'm so relieved I can barely type through the tears... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YvonneCa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:49 AM Response to Reply #6 |
17. I'm in California and I've been doing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CitizenLeft (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 12:09 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. oh thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YvonneCa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 01:57 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Neither will I. I hope some day that part of our history... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uponit7771 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:25 AM Response to Original message |
7. Please fill us non lawyer types in please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
steve2470 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:26 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. SCOTUS smacked down the Repubs, good for Dems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:27 AM Response to Reply #7 |
11. A Per Curiam decision is almost unheard of from the SCOTUS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RedSpartan (736 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:30 AM Response to Reply #11 |
14. In some cases you're right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:36 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. YEah, but compare the lengths of the decisions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RedSpartan (736 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:28 AM Response to Reply #7 |
12. See here: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnTheOtherHand (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:39 AM Response to Reply #12 |
16. although the circuit court managed... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:26 AM Response to Original message |
8. I frickin' LOVE IT!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:27 AM Response to Original message |
10. Wow! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rsdsharp (516 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
13. Usually, I'd agree with your analysis, and do in this case. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thevoiceofreason (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:20 PM Response to Original message |
20. 20 years ago I learned per curiam meant no one thought enough of the opinion to sign it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phx_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
21. It also means the Republicans can't pull this shit in other states. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marshall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
22. We'll have to see now if McCain files his own suit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
23. Didn't the decision basically say that it was not up to the GOP to try to enforce laws? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC