Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Sarah Palin Really Get A 840 On Her SAT?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-08 02:38 PM
Original message
Did Sarah Palin Really Get A 840 On Her SAT?
I can't believe it...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-08 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, combined.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-08 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Don't You Get 800 Just For Taking It?
I never took the SAT but I took the GRE...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-08 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. The lowest score is 400
Each section has a minimum of 200, so at the time she took it with just the Math and Verbal sections the minimum she could have scored is 400. The median of scores is in the low 500s for each section.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-08 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. No. When I took it 10 years ago you get 200 for just taking it.
I was following the same system I believe as Palin. The SAT system that she and I took has changed since 5 years ago.

So if you just signed your name you automatically got 200 points. If you were a minority, it was rumored you get more on a scale. Asians get the least extra, Hispanics/Blacks get the next highest, and Native Americans get higher extra points. But that's not by a lot. More like 20 or so points or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-08 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well now, that explains quite a bit.
A mind struggling to achieve mediocrity.

Go Sarahcuda go!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livedemocarticordie Donating Member (209 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-08 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. well ...
... if the score is 840, it would have to be combined since the year she took it, a perfect score was 1600; a perfect math score was 800...and perfect verbal score was 800.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-08 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. Is that high or low?
I never took any of those Entrance tests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-08 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. It's Pathetic
You would be in the bottom quintile...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-08 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Wow.
Maybe she was having a bad day.

But look on the bright side. She could always hit the Beauty Pageant circuit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoxFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Actually, it isn't
It's nothing to get excited about, but it's really the lower end of the center mass. I took the SATs in the same time frame as Palin, so I'm familiar with the scoring curve in place at the time.

Full disclosure: 680 verbal, 530 math


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. It's very low. Colleges don't look at you with that number. Fairbanks U wouldn't take her.
You'd have to take that again to get into Uni.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-08 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. wrong
it was an 841

http://buzzfeed.com/scott/sarah-palins-sat-scores

:rofl:

Ready from day 1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-08 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Her grade point was 2.2? Ouch. And five years of English?
Edited on Fri Oct-10-08 03:09 PM by gatorboy
How long was she in high school?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrymores Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. wrong. Combined SAT scores in 1981 were listed in multiples of "10."
Edited on Fri Oct-10-08 03:32 PM by Barrymores Ghost
Look it up. I know, because I took my SATs then.

I've got no problem with agreeing that Palin's as dumb as a dead hamster and a threat to free society, but let's not perptuate garbage that's so easily debunked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. I took my SATs by a whale oil lamp
but I thought a 425 Math and a 416 Verbal = 841. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrymores Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. The document they refer to is doctored.
Edited on Fri Oct-10-08 03:43 PM by Barrymores Ghost
I can add, too. What I'm saying is, someone took liberties with the scores.

http://buzzfeed.com/scott/sarah-palins-sat-scores

Were your combined SAT's divisible by ten? My bet is, if you took them when or after I did, that they are. And my point is that, in 1981, they always WOULD have been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. I only got a 1580
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. nice catch -
I wondered about that mine (from 1971) were not in multiples of 10, but my kids were. So, we now have some info on the age of the person who created this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-08 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. Yeah, she was fully vetted
And I am Bill Gates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. She was fully vetted....
by the religious wingnuts. She is everything they could desire. And that tells you how far around the bend they all are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goletian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-08 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
16. sounds pretty high for sarah palin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrymores Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-08 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
17. Let this thread sink...
Edited on Fri Oct-10-08 03:10 PM by Barrymores Ghost
...the document that shows she got an "841" on her SAT was Photoshopped.

SAT scores back then were listed as multiples of 10. I know from personal experience, and anyone can look it up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-08 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
18. Yes, but if she were the least bit "intellectually curious" it wouldn't SHOW so much.
Palin's not ignorant but she's let that "charm" work for her in rural Alaska where there's not near as many women competing for political office.

She's playing in The Big Leagues now and her ineptness is shining through.

This is more evidence to counter the claim that "Palin's a quick study."

I hope that she fades into political obscurity.

The Good People of Alaska deserve MUCH BETTER. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC