|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
NashVegas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:26 AM Original message |
Recommend If You Don't Give a Crap About Sarah Palin's SAT Scores |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
1. Can't recommend. I don't think it's the news of the century, but if they're real, she's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dbmk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:37 AM Response to Reply #1 |
14. Don't say that people are dim based on SAT scores alone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cdb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
2. Dont care. Probably photoshopped anyhow n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
3. Recommended. If we care about anything Palin specific at the moment, it should be the TG report... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:30 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Too True |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lamp_shade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
4. ok |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
npincus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
5. right... why attack the credibility of a harpie who calls Obama a terrorist-by-association? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:32 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. It's a Distraction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
npincus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:36 AM Response to Reply #7 |
12. no one is asking Barack to do it... why not stop Tina Fey, by your logic? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aint_no_life_nowhere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:37 AM Response to Reply #5 |
13. What, Me Worry? about the SAT scores of someone who could become President? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
npincus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:47 AM Response to Reply #13 |
25. You said it!!! A retarded Chimp charged us into Iraq... imagine what "End of Days" Palin would do!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bettyellen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
8. i think it's better than accusing her of being a slut for wearing a tank top under a jkt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
9. There are too many other things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thewiseguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:34 AM Response to Original message |
10. Actually I do give a damn. She is running for VP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:35 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. She's running for President. The old man won't last a full term. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crossroads (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:37 AM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Good point! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:39 AM Response to Reply #11 |
17. May Very Well Be, But Voters Don't See It That Way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:43 AM Response to Reply #17 |
23. I'm not sure why you think disseminating her SAT scores equates her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:50 AM Response to Reply #23 |
30. By the way, Dan Quayle, once labeled stupid, never had a political career |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:48 AM Response to Reply #17 |
28. Who is talking about Obama. We're a bunch of anonymous posters on the internet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:54 AM Response to Reply #11 |
31. Obama's running against Palin. McCain won't last. You've heard of "Big Brother." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:55 AM Response to Reply #31 |
34. Yeah, I read that Wolf article--it's a little paranoid, but I think there's some |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 12:00 PM Response to Reply #34 |
43. I agree about the paranoia. I was utterly dismayed about the part about her mail. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:58 AM Response to Reply #11 |
38. My thoughts exactly. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
16. If she has a low SAT, it's probably because she has a low IQ, which |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captiosus (711 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 01:02 PM Response to Reply #16 |
47. That's a bad generalization |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 01:33 PM Response to Reply #16 |
50. IQ tests are even more racially and culturally biased than the SAT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TTUBatfan2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
18. All I'll say is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supersedeas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 02:23 PM Response to Reply #18 |
66. agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marrah_G (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
19. I only care in the sense that I enjoy mocking her inadequency.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wndycty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:41 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Madam Mossfern (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
21. What were they? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:49 AM Response to Reply #21 |
29. I Forget |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rvablue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
22. K &R because Gawker (the source) says they are fake. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thewiseguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:54 AM Response to Reply #22 |
32. Link? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rvablue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 12:32 PM Response to Reply #32 |
45. It was in a title post that I read earlier on DU. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ericgtr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
24. No REC here - She's dumber than a bag of hammers and it should be out there for all to see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gauguin57 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
26. I pretty much discount anything a candidate did up till they were about 25 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
27. Considering that she may become president, I think her intelligence is relevant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:56 AM Response to Reply #27 |
35. I'm Sure, But She's Not Running For President Right Now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:58 AM Response to Reply #35 |
37. Jesus, for the second or third time--the Obama team will not touch this--we are NOT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 12:00 PM Response to Reply #37 |
42. Funny. All Spring I Was Told Something Different Right Here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 01:36 PM Response to Reply #35 |
52. Yes, she is running for president. That's the only role of the vice president. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 02:14 PM Response to Reply #35 |
65. This has nothing to do with Obama. VOTERS need to know as much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:55 AM Response to Original message |
33. You know what? Maybe if she didn't say Obama would diminish the prestige of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Curtland1015 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:58 AM Response to Original message |
36. Alternate Title: "Recommend if you got low SAT scores" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terrya (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
39. I'm tired of intellectual lightweights running this country. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MamaDem (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
40. I didn't need to see them to know she's and idiot. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vanderBeth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
41. I think they're fake. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pink-o (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
44. As I said on the other thread, I only scored a 900 on my SAT's in 1973 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Overseas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
46. Guess I can't recommend this. I am quite interested in more confirmation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uzybone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
48. Agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 01:32 PM Response to Original message |
49. The SAT is either racially and culturally biased and therefore invalid, or it isn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 01:52 PM Response to Reply #49 |
56. There's been studies that once a person reaches average to "a little above average" on an Aptitude |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 02:08 PM Response to Reply #56 |
60. Go Sun Devils! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 03:00 PM Response to Reply #60 |
67. Thank-you. Although I was a very serious student, I loved attending ASU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riqster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 01:35 PM Response to Original message |
51. Cheney has had immense influence over the Bush agenda |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansasVoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
53. You do realize she is the VP for the OLDEST candiate in history??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BklynChick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
54. I want as much insight into the intelligence (or lack thereof) of anyone running for public office. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 01:58 PM Response to Reply #54 |
58. Exactly, I agree wholeheartedly with Randi Rhodes, I want my President to have a high intellect. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stand and Fight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
55. Recommended. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 01:55 PM Response to Original message |
57. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 01:59 PM Response to Reply #57 |
59. Sneaky! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demmiblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 02:09 PM Response to Original message |
61. Seriously... WTF? Her SAT scores are totally relevant... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 02:10 PM Response to Original message |
62. Considering I've been all over news sites today and this is the first I've heard of it, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 02:10 PM Response to Original message |
63. Sheesh. The SAT is like 3rd grade level material.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-10-08 02:11 PM Response to Original message |
64. It matters whether she's intelligent or not. No rec from me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:38 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC