Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DU paying the price for past Gallup bashing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 10:25 AM
Original message
DU paying the price for past Gallup bashing
Edited on Wed Oct-08-08 10:40 AM by Kurt_and_Hunter
All these posts about tightening in second-tier tracking polls are funny. So what? Obama is kicking ass in the better known, longer term trackers.

DU is paying the price for months of constant dismissal of the Gallup daily tracking poll. It was never "fixed" or "meaningless." All tracking polls have their virtues and limitations. Gallup is what it is.

The Gallup Daily is probably more reliable than some of these less known tracking polls and Barack Obama really is enjoying his largest national lead ever, folks. (A result confirmed by equally despised 'obviously fake' Rasmussen daily.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. Let's face it, folks...
...we'll hate on any polll that doesn't put Obama a million points ahead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Y ou mean he's not?
FREEPER!!!!!!!

:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's a national poll, so it doesn't say much about the outcome of the election.
I thought that's what people were referring to when they called it 'meaningless'. I know that's how I think of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. That argument sounds sensible in theroy, but is not correct in practice
For the argument to have meaning we should have at least one example in the last century when the popular vote did not match the electoral college winer.

(Gore won Florida. There was no mis-match in 2000)

National polling is inferior to 50 identical state polls conducted on the same evening. But no polling organization has ever done that. Too expensive.

Compared to REAL state polls, as opposed to hypothetical state polls, national poling is more timely and less twitchy. The accumulation of state polls runs a week behind and the individual polls are often crap.

All national polls show Obama ahead in mid to high single digits.

There were state polls of Minnesota in the last week showing a tie, and showing Obama up by 18. At least one of those polls is worthless. Which one? And averaging garbage doesn't yield truth.

If you were betting money on a presidential election and could only see public national polling or public state polling the national polling is actually a better predictor of how the states will go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. The numbers are never as important as the trend lines
That's simply the fact about all polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. Gallup and Ras are obviously fixed. Obama must be 20 ahead. Or if that isn't the case,
then they're obviously fixed and only showing us this to lull us into a false sense of security to cover up McCain's gains, so they can unleash them when it really matters.

Either way, those are much more exciting possibilities than the boring and sometimes threatening nature of reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
7. It's not costing me a thing, polls are still crap. Get over it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kokonoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
8. I see your poll as Obama ahead 1!%, above half the decideds.
Edited on Wed Oct-08-08 10:49 AM by kokono
When WE KNOW ITS 60 40. Its fixed.

We just cannot comprehend how much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
9. I think it's only that silly Hotline poll that has it close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC