Why is the MSM not ripping Palin about not talking to the press???

[KansasVoter]

This should be a huge story!

The MSM should be pissed about it. It is an insult to them and the american people.

What a joke!

[Dollface]

1. They resepct her right to act like Cheney?

[ShortnFiery]

3. Yes AND if they get the GOP back into the Executive Branch the M$M can consolidate

even more, thus enjoying that corporate welfare as they dumb-down us "losers" in the chattering classes. :eyes:

[Lancer]

2. The night shift on MSNBC is hammering this,

and they remind us daily that no Democrat could get away with it. Not sure what the other news outlets are saying.

[ShortnFiery]

8. WTF, night shift is "a threat" to Grampy when he has FOX as his personal network?

[fed_up_mother]

4. They were ripping her, but Wall Street has changed everything

[Ioo]

5. Because it is one story, and they printed it last week or so.

[fencesitter]

6. She is talking to the press..

She's on Fox a lot.:eyes:

[ShortnFiery]

11. Granting a personal interview to some Omaha NE, GOP newspaper commentator ALSO.

:silly:

[jojo54]

7. The same reason why they're not talking about

the "terrorist" and "kill him" comments.

[spanone]

9. their ratings depend on this being a horse race.....

[archiemo]

10. I agree...and if SNL lets her

come on their show I'm really going to be upset. Why does the media continue to cover her rallies, speeches, etc when she basically told them to take a flying fuck? It's a two way street...they cover her...she responds to questions. If not, CUT HER OFF!

[ShortnFiery]

13. The no-talent ultra wealthy CEOs are ruining the creativity within both the music and entertainment

industry. Never mind that "the news" is bullshit manufactured sputum fed to the M$M by the ruling political class. :(

No wonder we'll never enjoy "the enlightenment" of the 60s and 70s ... the f**king wealthy M$M OWNERS are no talent NERDS.

[EffieBlack]

12. And why do they continue covering her on HER terms?

I'm sure that every candidate would love to have their coverage limited to their made-for-tv stump speeches. Why do they continue covering her exactly the way the campaign wants her to, while she nonchalantly spits in their faces?

[leftist.]

14. Is there a serious answer to this question? If so I'd like to know as well.

It is rather unprecedented and I haven't been able to figure out why they haven't pushed a bit further. There are the UN incidents to point to, but outside of that I'm having trouble thinking of any other time that they've really brought it up. Thanks for asking this.