Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Odd Lies Of Sarah Palin XVI: Divestment From Sudan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:13 PM
Original message
The Odd Lies Of Sarah Palin XVI: Divestment From Sudan

She really does just make things up. In last night's debate she said:

"When I and others in the legislature found out that we had some millions of dollars in Sudan, we called for divestment through legislation of those dollars."
Yep: you guessed it:

A search of news clips and transcripts from the time do not turn up an instance in which Palin mentioned the Sudanese crisis or concerns about Alaska's investments tied to the ruling regime. Moreover, Palin's administration openly opposed the bill, and stated its opposition in a public hearing on the measure.


"The legislation is well-intended, and the desire to make a difference is noble, but mixing moral and political agendas at the expense of our citizens' financial security is not a good combination," testified Brian Andrews, Palin's deputy treasury commissioner, before a hearing on the Gara-Lynn Sudan divestment bill in February. Minutes from the meeting are posted online by the legislature.



Gara says the lack of support from Palin's administration helped kill the measure.



"I walked out of that hearing livid," Gara recalled of the February meeting. Because of the Palin administration's opposition to the bill, "We could not get a vote in that committee," he explained.
Permalink :: Trackback (0) :: Sphere It!

http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/10/the-odd-lies--2.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. This needs to be up on the Greatest page. Not only a lie, but a lie about genocide!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. ha! hope Keith has it, then others will report
as much as Andrew Sullivan annoys me, he does a good job on getting good stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sarah Palin claimed this morning to be against the "eminent domain" decision
...of the Supreme Court (Kelo case) since she thinks "private property rights are so precious."

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/221816.php


But she used eminent domain as mayor to get land for a sports complex:

http://dwb.adn.com/news/alaska/matsu/story/9055227p-8971221c.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lolamio Donating Member (494 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. This needs to be reported by the MSM. She's reprehensible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. This story is important. Young evangelicals care about this.
They're looking for an excuse to vote Obama. This is it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juno jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. I was kind of shocked when she said that
because I remembered when this came up. Most people here supported the divestiture, but the managers of the Permanent Fund opposed it on purely fiscal grounds -- I guess that's what money managers to. But with a little more proactivity from Sarah maybe they would have seen the light. Les Gara is absolutely correct here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. kickity - kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbmk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. How the hell does she think she can get away with this stuff?
Edited on Fri Oct-03-08 04:54 PM by dbmk
Ok, I think I know why, but it still astonishes me. They truly are running a 20th century campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC