Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does anyone else think that Palin's endorsement of "Cheney Plus" as a VP model was a major blunder

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:31 AM
Original message
Does anyone else think that Palin's endorsement of "Cheney Plus" as a VP model was a major blunder
that probably made even McCaine and his advisors cringe?

The last thing McGrumpy would want is a Cheney clone undermining his Presidential authority and starting fights over the separation of powers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Palin wants to make a greater power grab than Cheney - yup you betcha darn tutin
Edited on Fri Oct-03-08 11:34 AM by dmordue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think Paliin's endorsement of Palin was a major blunder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. Don't cha know
darn it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BridgeTheGap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. Has anyone asked her about her membership in the secessionist group?
Maybe she thinks if she's v.p. she'll have the power to allow Alaska to go its own way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. I think we should brand Palin as "Cheney, Also"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
6. She is preparing you for the fact that they want to let us know
in advance that she will be the real President and Gramps will be vacationing in his 7 homes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurt_cagle Donating Member (294 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
7. It was a major blunder
Cheney has been a major power behind the throne pretty much from the beginning, but he wouldn't have been allowed to take that power even by the Republican Illuminati if he had not also been a major political player since the Nixon administration (his tenure at Halliburton was clearly temporary even at the time - it was a place to park himself while the Republicans were out of power during the Clinton administration).

Palin's the kind of person who sees the title and the power but not the responsibility or the work necessary to get that title. Clearly, McCain is not going to let some bimbo, even his hand-chosen bimbo, dictate policy to him, and whereas Cheney was "tasked" to handle energy issues because those were the most immediate donors that needed payback after the 2000 election (and because they needed the support of those oil companies in order to proceed on their planned war on Iraq), putting Palin into that role was clearly intended only to give her some apparent substance in even one area, and I suspect that like most things Palin touches, that's now backfiring spectacularly.

From McCain's standpoint, Palin is there for one reason and one reason only - to shore up the fundamentalist support for his campaign. Given the bill of goods that he got sold from that camp (my guess is that Palin was Dobson's price for support) if by some demonic chance he does happen to win McCain will think strongly of moving the VP Mansion to Anchorage, and as far away from him as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. So hopefully there will be a TV ad on it. Or maybe it will come up in one of the two remaining
debates. Someone needs to ask McGrumpy if he agrees with Palin and Cheney on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC