The "handlers" tried to put the old Reagan "there you go again, Joe" line in there for her...

[Blue_Roses]

good grief:eyes:

Can this woman think for herself:shrug:

[AspenRose]

1. She's no Reagan, that's for sure

[grannylib]

2. All her attempts at "humor" were lame, sarcastic, snotty, snide, mean,

childish, factually incorrect...
in other words, typically rePigliCon.

[lyonn]

10. That is one cold human being

She wags and drags those kids around like baggage, never any real emotion. It's all a photo op. Just another beauty? contest? You have to wonder how many are out there like Pat Buchanan who are totally smitten by her, ugh. Poor Pat, he does have unusual issues.

[livetohike]

3. Just a little genuflecting at St. Reagan's grave

:eyes: No she cannot think for herself. That's why her interviews with Gibson and Couric were so bad. Notice in the debate she just spewed her talking points whether it was the topic or not. This will be talked about a lot tomorrow when people have had time to read the transcript.

[bullwinkle428]

4. Went over like a wet fart in the Wasilla Assembly of God church!

[ErinBerin84]

5. her snide little lines were so predictable!

Um...here's how you are going to avoid talking about voting records, Sarah. Say that it is people being stuck in the past...that's the ticket..and rip off Reagan while you're at it!

[falcon97]

6. And it didn't even fit.

It was like she was scrambling to check everything off her list of things to say before time ran out. Just pitiful.

[jberryhill]

8. She was losing Palin bingo and needed two more words /nt

[choie]

7. That and "say it ain't so, Joe" were repulsive.

Though what really bugged me was her calling Obama "Barack." That's Senator Obama to you, ditz. If your running mate churlishly refuses to use his first name despite their being colleagues, you don't get to use it when you've never even met the guy! Manipulative piece of work.

[Naturyl]

9. It failed majorly.

The *multiple* attempts to channel Reagan all fell flat.