|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Blue Meany (986 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 01:46 PM Original message |
Why do Democrats always nominate the most liberal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
foo_bar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 01:47 PM Response to Original message |
1. I'm sure Feingold or Bernie Sanders don't count somehow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buck Rabbit (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 01:54 PM Response to Reply #1 |
19. Bernie doesn't count but Harkin and Wyden and Boxer and Murray and... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
foo_bar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 02:06 PM Response to Reply #19 |
28. well he wrote "the most liberal member" (not "their most liberal") |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buck Rabbit (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 02:26 PM Response to Reply #28 |
39. You're right, the OP didnt specify Dem /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodlessBiker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
2. Hello and thanks for all the fish. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BklynChick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
3. Obama certainly doesn't have the most liberal voting record in the Senate. Don't believe the RW hype |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maseman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 01:55 PM Response to Reply #3 |
21. I may be mistaken but I think the OP is being |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
4. roflmao. Thanks. I needed a laugh today. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Morning Dew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
5. which "we" is that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bill McBlueState (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
6. weird, isn't it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud Liberal Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 02:15 PM Response to Reply #6 |
31. Robert Greenwald |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demokatgurrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
7. When did we do that?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 01:54 PM Response to Reply #7 |
18. It's according to a right wing mag, the National Journal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cottonseed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
8. Because the National Journal always ranks the Dem candidate as "most liberal". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue Meany (986 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 01:55 PM Response to Reply #8 |
22. Not this year, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cottonseed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 04:15 PM Response to Reply #22 |
44. Funny how that works, isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebass1271 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
9. Haven't you noticed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knixphan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
10. Bernie would punch you in the mouth for repeating that lie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheBigotBasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
11. Being Liberal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
secondwind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
12. 3 years on DU and only 105 posts, and NOW you are asking this shit? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redwitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
13. I think it's an honorary title. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheBigotBasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 01:55 PM Original message |
Why do the Republicans select the most dangerous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue Meany (986 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
24. That's easy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxsolomon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 01:53 PM Response to Original message |
14. i share your concern |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demmiblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 01:54 PM Response to Original message |
15. Because any democrat running for pres is the most liberal... duh! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 01:54 PM Response to Original message |
16. We could reanimate William F. Buckley, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 01:54 PM Response to Original message |
17. because conservatives want to keep the status quo, why would you want that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EstimatedProphet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 01:55 PM Response to Original message |
20. By the same token: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
southpaw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 01:56 PM Response to Original message |
23. I get ya, Blue Meany |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 02:01 PM Response to Original message |
25. My response to that has always been "And?". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebass1271 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 02:17 PM Response to Reply #25 |
32. GOOD ANSWER!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redwitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 02:17 PM Response to Reply #25 |
33. You didn't get the memo? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cameozalaznick (624 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
26. For the same reason we keep catching Al Queda's number two. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peacetrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
27. Well Blue Meany, no matter who would be put up, the oppostion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sweetpotato (678 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 02:11 PM Response to Original message |
29. You write liberal like its a bad thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rvablue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 02:14 PM Response to Original message |
30. It's also a conservative rag |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 02:18 PM Response to Original message |
34. Correction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 02:21 PM Response to Original message |
35. I've said it before: He doesn't even have the most liberal voting record in his state. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ichingcarpenter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 02:21 PM Response to Original message |
36. Blue Meany were the evil anti-liberal nasty buggers in Yellow Submarine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 02:21 PM Response to Original message |
37. i hear ya. it is funny. and so is your post. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkofos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 02:22 PM Response to Original message |
38. Why are you falling for RW talking points? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ContinentalOp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 02:27 PM Response to Original message |
40. Don't forget Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
41. Where do you get your erroneous information? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
denem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
42. Because Ted Kennedy is not running? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 02:30 PM Response to Original message |
43. Wow! you really must choose your posts carefully. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-02-08 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
45. I feel your palin. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 01st 2024, 09:30 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC