Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Silent Audience Rule for Debate?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
southpaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 11:23 AM
Original message
Silent Audience Rule for Debate?
At the first Obama/McCain debate, the audience was told to be silent... no applause or other response during the debate.

Is that a standard rule for these debates?

If so, it will play against Palin's ability to deliver zingers.

Snarky rejoinders come off as falling flat when there is no audience reaction. It's like a comedian delivering a punch line and being answered only by the clinking of dishes from the kitchen at the back of the club.

T.V. viewers are likely to interpret Palin's snark as being ineffective without the laugh-track she had at the convention.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. No USA! USA! USA! chants?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. There was some polite laughter at the 1st Prez debate
When Obama was asked to direct his response to McCombover and then McCombover replied with the hearing quip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southpaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. That's true...
And I recall that McCain actually got a laugh when he did the ridiculous dialogue between Akmed in a jacket and Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tosh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
4. "T.V. viewers are likely to interpret Palin's snark ...
... as being ineffective without the laugh-track she had at the convention."

Indeed! And I doubt she can fuction well without that "audience" feedback.

Like a kid on Christmas eve!!:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southpaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yet another way that this will work against her
If indeed she attempts to use snark and sarcasm like she did at the convention, being met largely with silence will be a major blow to her confidence.


"They're not laughing... they must HATE me!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
6. They've never been able to silence laughter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think it is pretty much standard
although with the desperation they are feeling, of course, they will have trolls planted throughout the hall to snicker at her mean snide "zingers"

In yesteryears, I remember during discussions to work out the debate details, that there was often squabbling whether or not candidates could have "Paper" (i.e. notes) on the lecturn.

Don't remember anything about this, this year, but who cares, I guess. She had notes during the Couric interview and it only managed to make her sound more stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. I recall the same instructions for at least one and possibly all of the 2004 debates.
My guess is that it's pretty much a standard rule and probably a good one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slampoet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. In 2004 I heard Lerher instructing the audience. He told them their job was to "bear silent Witness"

The audience's job is to not be a regular audience.


They are more akin to the witness booth at an execution. Not the best comparison but it does fit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC