Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tight House Races Feel Bailout Fallout

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 11:24 PM
Original message
Tight House Races Feel Bailout Fallout
By John Fritze, USA TODAY
Political drama over the $700 billion Wall Street bailout began seeping into the nation's most competitive House races Tuesday as candidates tried to measure public reaction to the bill's fate.

Republican challengers criticized a handful of Democrats in close races who voted for the bailout measure, injecting a new wrinkle in an election year when Democrats hope to expand their House and Senate majorities.

"This crisis and the way it's been handled is another example of how Washington has changed Dennis Moore more than Dennis Moore has changed Washington," Republican candidate Nick Jordan said of his opponent, a Kansas Democrat who voted for the bill.

Jordan, who held a news conference in Mission, Kan., to discuss the bailout vote, is locked in a tight race with Moore, according to the non-partisan Cook Political Report. In a statement, Moore said, "I voted for this bipartisan compromise because it took the necessary steps to protect American taxpayers."

Most House incumbents in close races voted against the bill that even supporters acknowledged was unpopular. Of 37 Republicans in races that Cook has identified as competitive, 32 voted against the bill. Of 29 endangered Democrats, 18 voted no.

MORE...

USATODAY: http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-09-30-houseraces_N.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is why the vote should have been held after the election
You hold a vote on something like this a month before an election, and the politicians will act like little children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 02:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC