Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Schizo MSM... You're best to ignore their Dual Personality. They do it for themselves.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 12:56 PM
Original message
The Schizo MSM... You're best to ignore their Dual Personality. They do it for themselves.
Edited on Tue Sep-30-08 12:56 PM by berni_mccoy
Many here are surprised when one minute the MSM is for Obama and the next they are knocking him down. Even Fox has partaken in this schizoidal behavior (O'Liely was very complimentary, sort of, to Obama after Obama came on his show).

I've been monitoring their behavior and they are extremely consistent: When a candidate is leading in the polls, they attack or show unfavorably that candidate and they show more good for the current loser in the polls.

Why? So they can keep this a close race. If the polls for Obama stay high for too long, then viewership of the MSM will start to drop off because the race settles into a 'steady-state'. They have to then highlight something negative to bring viewers back, and they usually do it on the leader.

Also, the MSM controls the polls to a certain extent... they reveal the numbers that are interesting to them. They don't talk about every poll and they certainly won't talk about Electoral Votes. The only time they did talk about EV's was when Obama was at his weakest in the EV polls. Now that Obama has over an 83% chance of winning (based on www.fivethirthyeight.com ev scenario analysis) and Obama is now winning enough states with greater than a 5% margin that it will be no contest, the MSM won't talk about it. If they did, the momentum would continue to build for Obama and it would become a landslide too quickly.

And I'm not so certain that this is a bad thing. It may be good after all. The last thing we need is to presume we are going to win and then people become complacent and voter turnout is underwhelming. If people believe this is a close race, then it's probably better for Obama. His entire campaign is about registering more voters and keeping them involved in the campaign. And even though we all know by the numbers that Obama would have to do something seriously wrong to lose at this point, it's good that we keep our new voters engaged.

So with my blessings, the MSM can call this a close race. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. of course, the other reason they need to keep the numbers close is so that, when THIS election is
stolen, it might look slightly credible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC