Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scarbourgh with Tucker Bounds today...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 06:09 PM
Original message
Scarbourgh with Tucker Bounds today...
These repigs just can not give a straight answer, ever.

Joe asked Tucker about McInsane's inability to look at Obama during the debate, which McInsane clear did and what did Tucker say; it was along the lines of "well, yes he did...blah blah blah" He gave a crappy answer and then proceeded to talk mcInsane up and make attempts to hit Obama with some more bullshit.

Just answer the fucking question. They talk around the questions because they are so accustomed to lying about everything.

I don't have a link sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Andy823 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Tucker Bounds is even dumber
Than "Tucker Carlson", and that's pretty dumb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. All he did was ramble...
his mouth was moving but nothing relevant was coming out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdxmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. I saw David Schuster interviewing Heather Wilson, and he asked her
about McLame's gaffe regarding Pakistan being a failed state. She totally ignored the question and started babbling about how dangerous the border area of Pakistan was. She completely avoided answering the question and Schuster didn't follow up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yup...Non answers is all they have...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I saw that too.... it simply meant that there is no defending that statement, so she didn't try
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC