Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did anyone catch Biden on CNN a couple of minutes ago about McCain raising taxes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 02:55 PM
Original message
Did anyone catch Biden on CNN a couple of minutes ago about McCain raising taxes
Edited on Sat Sep-27-08 02:56 PM by peacetrain
on the middle class. According to Biden, McCains health plan, figures people who currently have a health care plan ie blue cross etc, that the health care benefit will be taxed as income. Example you make 50,000 a year, your health care benefit package is 12,000. so now you will be taxed for 62,000 a year.

Biden said this will be the largest tax hike on the middle class ever.!

I am dumbfounded, if it is as Biden describes it, McCain just shot the hole in his own boat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hope And Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Biden has hit McCain a lot on this issue lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I must have been asleep at the wheel, this is the first time I heard it..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KewlKat Donating Member (867 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Obama mentioned it in last nights debate n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. That must have been after I turned the tv off.. I just could not listen
to McCain anymore..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Realityhack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Unfortunately he screwed up who the burdon would fall on. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #11
42. did he say it would fall on the employer? i assumed that to mean employers
would then shrink benefits. but taxing employees so much more is so much worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Exactly...
he did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grateful for Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
38. Yes he did
and, McCain had no answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Holy cow - whole nother tax bracket for many people!
I've only generally heard of the repukes health care plan, never the specifics and never broken down in real $$ layman's terms like that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. this is not new


McCain is going to tax employers for the health benefits which are now considered a business expense.


This is to be offset by a personal deduction for each American for what they pay.


It is a colossally stupid idea and undermines the whole philosophical idea of social insurance by having 'shared risk of large numbers'.

It will end up with lower rates for people that are very healthy and more expensive rates or no insurance for people with health problems.

It creates a disincentive for companies to buy insurance.


But there is no chance for any of this shit to pass because we are going to have a Democratic Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. I never fully understood what McCain meant by the 5000 tax credit
Because for many people, that would be meaningless, to have a credit on money the do not have..but now I see the light. McCain wants to increase the middle class taxes, then say here is a partial credit..

If I did not get it grantcart, the full implication, trust me, alot of America is not getting that.

The press is not clearing that up either, apparently they don't get the full ramifications yet.

Amazing isn't it, just amazing .. no wonder he did not mention the middle class once last night.


aii yii yii
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KewlKat Donating Member (867 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. Obama covered this in Dover NH
Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama hammered John McCain on the issue of taxes today, while speaking in Dover, NH. Obama specifically pointed out that McCain’s healthcare plan would tax workers’ health insurance benefits.

“And I can make a firm pledge: under my plan, no family making less than $250,000 will see their taxes increase – not your income taxes, not your payroll taxes, not your capital gains taxes, not any of your taxes. My opponent can’t make that pledge, and here’s why: for the first time in American history, he wants to tax your health benefits Apparently, Senator McCain doesn’t think it’s enough that your health premiums have doubled, he thinks you should have to pay taxes on them too. That’s a $3.6 trillion tax increase on middle class families. That will eventually leave tens of millions of you paying higher taxes. That’s his idea of change,” Obama said.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. I know several people who were stunned when Obama mentioned it.
The reaction was ... "Wait a minute. Is that right? Is he really going to tax our benefits? Well... FUCK THAT!"

Obama and Biden really need to repeat this over and over again. Put it in a national ad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadrasT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Yep, I got at least two "on the fence" people to flip over to our side
after I told them about that one. It is a big deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
28. I think this is huge!! Especially since we are being asked to bail out wall street
who the republicans let run amok.. Let us not forget K street initiative. And now this..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Realityhack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
31. I will have to mention this to a few people.
I know it would spike taxes for everyone I work with. We are fortunate enough to have fully paid health insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. I heard Biden mention this the other day as well
Hope they keep hammering McTroll and co on this, its terrible for the middle class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
14. This is an important issue
Everybody's taxable income would go up immediately but they'd have no extra money in their pocket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Allyoop Donating Member (147 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
15. Taxing health care benefits

Try this:



http://blog.thehill.com/2008/09/16/mccain-secretly-plans-new-tax-on-middle-class

Sorry, I copied and pasted and it doesn't come out as a link, but the info is here.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Allyoop Donating Member (147 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Well I'll be darned
Shows I don't post very often - the link is there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Thankyou for the link Alleyoop, I brought some of it out for people to read
McCain Secretly Plans New Tax on Middle Class
September 16th, 2008

John McCain should not be traveling in a bus called the Straight Talk Express. No, that equivocating multimillionaire who kowtows constantly to the wealthy should be riding in one of those private, gilded railroad cars.

That would be symbolically appropriate as well since he is trying to railroad the middle class on taxes.

He is actually proposing a brand new tax on the middle class.

This has gotten so little attention it is astounding. And frightening, frankly, as television reporters and commentators focus instead on inane incidents like the lipstick-on-pigs remark.

McCain intends to tax workers for the value of health insurance that they receive from their employers.

Really.

Although it’s not included in the description of his plan on his web site. It is, however, on the site of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, a non-profit organization that specializes in health policy.

I understand McCain neglecting to mention this new tax on the middle class. If I were proposing this shocking tax increase, one that will cost the average American worker an additional $110 a month in taxes out of the blue, I would conceal it as best I could too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineProgressive Donating Member (134 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
16. Oops
I think Joe was incorrect about this.

http://www.startribune.com/politics/29815459.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Now I am more confused, I just figured my out, and my
employer pays 14,400, that I would be taxed on, and i teach, so trust me, I am not in anyones upper brackets.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. The thing is that by going form a group plan to an individual plan
you will lose coverage for preexisting conditions and McCain's plan has no requirement for coverage of anything preexisting. Most companies will not issue insurance at any cost to cancer survivors or people with chronic conditions.

McCain himself would not be able to get private insurance under his plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Oh this is just getting worse by the moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. Take a look at this MaineProgressive
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Passaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
19. That's the best kept secret of the McCain camp. Something I'm sure Obama will bring up soon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
21. Good article linked below. McCain's plan would result in MORE uninsured & higher costs for families
as well as fewer protections for consumers. In other word, good luck getting the greedy SOBs to pay for your health care. If you have a preexisting condition, you are completely screwed.

ABSTRACT:

Senator John McCain's (R-AZ) health plan would eliminate the current tax exclusion of employer payments for health coverage, replace the exclusion with a refundable tax credit for those who purchase coverage, and encourage Americans to move to a national market for nongroup insurance. Middle-range estimates suggest that initially this change will have little impact on the number of uninsured people, although within five years this number will likely grow as the value of the tax credit falls relative to rising health care costs. Moving toward a relatively unregulated nongroup market will tend to raise costs, reduce the generosity of benefits, and leave people with fewer consumer protections.

<snip>

The tax exclusion for employer-sponsored health insurance provides a subsidy to people who obtain coverage through their jobs. A sizable economics literature shows that the tax subsidy greatly increases employers' offers of health benefits.2 Some of this research indicates that employers' decisions are most responsive to the "tax price" faced by their more highly compensated workers.3 However, to qualify for the tax subsidy, employers must abide by IRS nondiscrimination rules, which require firms to provide similar benefits to high- and low-wage employees. These rules have the effect of increasing the health insurance coverage of less skilled workers who work in firms that also employ highly skilled workers.4 The tax exclusion also strengthens risk pooling by creating an incentive for younger, healthier people to remain in employer-sponsored groups, where they effectively subsidize higher-risk workers.5 For these reasons, the tax exclusion has been described as "part of the glue that holds employment groups together as risk pools for purchasing health benefits."6

Eliminating the tax exclusion would greatly reduce the number of people who obtain health insurance through their employers.7 This decline would be driven by three factors: the effective price of employer-sponsored coverage would increase, the nondiscrimination rules would no longer apply, and low-risk employees would have less incentive to remain in employer-sponsored groups.

More at link:

http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/full/hlthaff.27.6.w472/DC1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livetohike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
23. I don't think Obama explained this in much detail the way
you just did last night. He mentioned the $5,000, but he said the corporation would be taxed and he should have said it will be added to your taxable income. Maybe he will clarify this in the economic debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #23
32. Perhaps he was saving it for the other debates
Since this debate the focus was supposed to be on foreign policy, he probably wasn't planning on going into it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
24. I never truly understood the 'taxing health care benefits' until Biden
explained it. He even describes the situations abroad in a way I can understand.

And it IS just as Biden describes it. He usually lays it out in his campaign speeches/appearances, but unfortunately the media doesn't cover him much. And, unfortunately, most of those in the audience are Obama supporters, anyway.

They should make a 30 second TV spot with that explanation. And flood the airways.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Exactly ..This is the first time, that the 5000 tax credit, which
just was mush to me, this is the first time I understand what they were talking about. And I am not a stupid person.

So my thoughts are that most of America does not have a good understanding of what Uncle John wants to do to us.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VIC in MO Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
27. It Makes a difference
I can tell you firsthand that this will hurt. Since my partner was recently laid off, I had her added to my employer insurance. But, since legally relationship not recognized, etc., the benefit is treated as "non-qualified", the value of the benefit is added to pre-tax income and the monthly deductible is taken post-tax. Result? About $190 less per month in take-home pay. The bulk of the lost income is from additional taxes created.

This sounds like exactly what McLame is proposing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. welcome to du!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VIC in MO Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #33
41. Thank you so much!
I've been lurking since 2004. Glad to be here!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #27
37. Yes it does, and sorry that you are fighting that insurance
devil. I wish we had a simpler system, something more akin to the Canadian system, with a choice component. Basically what Obama is talking about..But with this GOD awful bailout, I am not sure there will be any money left to get it up and running
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brundle_Fly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
30. He explained it so perfectly.
dumbed down so anyone can understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildflowergardener Donating Member (863 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
34. Tax
Would this still have to go through the house and senate - could they vote no on this, even if (God Forbid) we have a McCain presidency?

Meg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Haven't a clue, One would think so, but the way the republicans
have twisted things the last 8 years, heck 30 years, up is down and down is up, you just don't know!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
36. K & R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iiibbb Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
39. Don't forget the 5000 tax credit....
Not that people won't still be screwed because it's unlikely they're paying a total of 5000 in taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Here is the problem as I see it iiibbb...
I looked at my health benefit, and it is 14,400 a year. Now that will be considered income. That boosts me into a brand new tax bracket. I am not seeing how a 5,000 credit is going to help me in the long run. It might in the short, but these things always expand out, and insurance goes up every year, every time we get a raise, the insurance goes up to eat that raise up almost exactly, and that tax credit, will start being an additional tax burden very quickly.

If some companies completely drop their insurance component, now others who have lower income brackets, are going to be up ship creek. That 5,000 credit is worthless when you need family insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
43. i use this one ALL the time. people dont know about it. healthcare before taxed is one of the few
things that make the hardworking people feel good. to tell them that they will now be taxed on it is PAINFUL for the.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
secondwind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
44. I knew about this all along, and we have been trying to convince family
members in NC to vote Obama, since they say they are "voting their wallet"........but still, no dice. Even if they will pay taxes on their health insurance.

It's the Bubba factor, unfortunately. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC