Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Stopping a Financial Crisis, the Swedish Way" ... LINK

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 11:55 PM
Original message
"Stopping a Financial Crisis, the Swedish Way" ... LINK
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/23/business/worldbusiness/23krona.html?em

Stopping a Financial Crisis, the Swedish Way

"A banking system in crisis after the collapse of a housing bubble. An economy hemorrhaging jobs. A market-oriented government struggling to stem the panic. Sound familiar?

It does to Sweden. The country was so far in the hole in 1992 — after years of imprudent regulation, short-sighted economic policy and the end of its property boom — that its banking system was, for all practical purposes, insolvent.

But Sweden took a different course than the one now being proposed by the United States Treasury. And Swedish officials say there are lessons from their own nightmare that Washington may be missing.

Sweden did not just bail out its financial institutions by having the government take over the bad debts. It extracted pounds of flesh from bank shareholders before writing checks. Banks had to write down losses and issue warrants to the government.

That strategy held banks responsible and turned the government into an owner. When distressed assets were sold, the profits flowed to taxpayers, and the government was able to recoup more money later by selling its shares in the companies as well."

MORE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ContinentalOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. No, no, that sounds like socialism.
Let's just write a blank check to a guy who used to work for one of these crooked institutions that we're bailing out. That'll fix it. And please get the check to him by Friday... OR ELSE.

Seriously though, that's a good article. I just happened to read that a few minutes ago before you posted this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. OK Mr. President!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Just shows they don't have to reinvent the wheel to deal with this crisis...
Smart people always look around to see if these kinds of crises have occurred before, and how others dealt with them.

We don't have to copy this plan, but there is a lot of wisdom in their approach we could benefit from in crafting our own solution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 03:37 AM
Response to Reply #5
16. How many history courses did the MBA president take?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. K & R.
I was looking for something on this a couple of days ago, thanks.
:kick: & R


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spag68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. Socialism
If socialism is so bad, why do those swedes and other country's around there seem to have such happy,educated, and healthy people? Think about this, they have Amsterdam, beer and pot, what a concept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Yet no one EVER, EVER bitches and moans about fascism.
I hear about the fear of Socialism all the time, but just once I'd like to hear the word fascism spoken. That is where we are heading. Police state and all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 03:38 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. me, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushmeister0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 04:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
20. Isn't it strange that all the countries closest to the "Iron Curtain"
right after WWII got set up with such liberal socialist governments?

It almost seems like the PTB in Washington were trying to convince all these countries not to go over to the "dark side" when our good friend Uncle Joe was in the assendant.

We almost lost France and Italy to the dirty commies, if you'll remember, just after the war.

The further you got from the borders of the USSR, the more right wing the governments wound up.

Accident? I think not.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
6. Send this to your congressman!
We need to demand no bailout WHILE offering alternative solutions. Remember Al Gore saying the Chinese symbol for crisis is also the symbol for opportunity? We could successfully start this country back up the road of a prudent mixed economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Will do. Have emailed them every day this week
There is always a new point to be made by some article posted on DU, and I let them know about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
7. That kind of ruthless capitalism is fine, until
some people think that the Public, because they pay the taxes, should be able to actually OWN anything.


THAT would be socialism. Even if they pay for it!


Damn Public.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 03:04 AM
Response to Original message
10. i posted this the other day..the main point is equity for taxpayers
<http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x7160604>

the essence of the swedish bailout was that taxpayers had equity shares, so they could benefit if the banks improved

the US plan does not provide taxpayer equity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 03:27 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. From what I saw on CNN, before McCain showed up. Taxpayer equity was on the list.
Edited on Fri Sep-26-08 03:29 AM by vaberella
When we bailed out AIG, that's what we got.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 04:08 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. but aig is earlier
the ny times article explains the swedish model involves taxpayer equity for the larger scale bailout

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 04:18 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. You're not understanding my statement.
On CNN, they listed what was in the Frank-Dodd revision Bill. They said of the provisions taxpayer equity shares were on teh list. 3 of Obama's six provisions were met. The fourth one on mortgage, Obama wanted the stimulus package to be done separately and the last is changes that need to be made to SEC, which just involves with the SEC putting that in their paper work and there's a committee attached to that.

Anyway the provision was met as stated today on CNN. That changed with McCain and we're back at no.1, so to speak.

My reference to AIG was to show the comparison between the two bail outs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 03:11 AM
Response to Original message
11. Clearly the right solution
involves taxpayer shares of ownership, if we are indeed going to bail anything out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 03:23 AM
Response to Original message
12. That was the best article I read yesterday....
Really showed that a melding of socialistic ideals could be melded into a free market approach and ne successful
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 03:26 AM
Response to Original message
13. I thought this was Obama's plan from the beginning?! Was it just me?! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 03:31 AM
Response to Original message
15. K/R.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
18. We should push for it, do it, and make the rethugs sick to their stomachs over it.
I'm all for anything that has a proven track record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quantass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 03:50 AM
Response to Original message
19. Ok, so why isnt ANYONE (Congress, Candidates, MSM) bringing this up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 04:12 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. What are you talking about? The Frank-Dodd bill had
equity shares to us. It did not give gifts to the CEOs. It needed more language but that was the plan, oh and panels and committees to watch over these things.

Unfortunately McCain showed up, GOP went crazy and everuything was blown to hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC