Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

October surprise: McCain's coming stroke on 10/17/08

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 10:46 AM
Original message
October surprise: McCain's coming stroke on 10/17/08
Edited on Thu Sep-18-08 10:49 AM by SoonerPride
Dateline 10/17/2008.

**BREAKING NEWS** John McCain has a massive stroke and is rushed to ER. Condition unknown. Doctors say the situation is "grave."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

What happens then?

Does the election go forward?

Get postponed?

I fear some sort of "calamity" which forces an "emergency measure" which vacates the election and we get a permanent junta in the Oval Office.

Please talk me down off the ledge.

I had a really vivid dream last night and it wasn't pretty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. The GOP would just replace him with someone like Romney or Huckabee
I get the feeling that many in the GOP really aren't very thrilled with McCain/Palin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. But those names can't be on the ballots that late in the game.
Legally, I don't think you can just say "replace John with Mitt"

Thus the calls for postponement and "we'll get around to having an election sometime next year."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. I thought about that just this morning.
And that's not something I generally think about. They'd probably run Palin with Romney as VP, or vice-versa. They could not suspend the election, but we've seen that the Bushies will do anything. What a horrifying thought! Luckily, most of the time, dreams are just dreams, and thoughts are just thoughts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. But the ballots are locked. Printed. Done.
What happens then?

I don't think you could legally just say "John's out so it's Romney / Palin now."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Same that happened with Mel Carnahan in 2000 in Missouri

McCain/Palin would still be on the ballot.

If they won, Palin would be sworn in on January 20th and then would nominate a VP as per the 25th amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. You are probably right.
But I worry abotu the criminals in the White House.

I put nothing past them at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
19. That was under Missouri's election laws

There is no "federal law" on who or what gets on a ballot or how.

The Constitution leaves the conduct of elections up to the states.

(which, by the way, is why Bush v. Gore was an instance of conservative judicial activism)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. There is no way to "vacate" an election in the U.S..... stop with the bullshit
Edited on Thu Sep-18-08 10:55 AM by scheming daemons
McCAin/Palin would still be on the ballot, since the ballots would already be set.


But just like when Mel Carnahan won in Missouri senate race after he died, it would be understood that Ms. Palin would be sworn in as President on January 20th because of the 25th amendment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. So the option would be to vote for an invalid/Palin?
That wouldn't cause any controversy.

Would it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Oh.. it would be controversial alright.... and it would probably lead to an Obama massive landslide
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. An election is not postponed, the GOP would select a replacement candidate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. Well, they may say that, but McCain/Palin would be on the ballot
Then what?

Palin gets elected and gets to choose her VP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. Actually, once the ballots are set, the replacement candidate is the VP nominee...

I don't think they could change that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #8
18. ...in each state that permits it

States control the manner in which they hold elections.

The answer to the question is "there are 50 possible different simultaneous answers".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abburdlen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
9. I don't think you're too off base
Right now the press is openly calling him a liar.
Who long before they start asking if he is senile?
The evidence is mounting that he really, really really isn't up for the job.

I can see them dropping him from the ticket - Palin is attracting bigger crowds than he is anyway -

It may be too late for his name to be removed from the ballot and I don't know the rules for what would happen if something happen to McCain but I don't think postponing the election is legally an option (not that that would stop them)
I could imagine it being announced that McCain will not be able to serve for whatever medical reason and he and Palin have picked a VP to take her spot after she takes over at the top of the ticket. It might get them some sympathy, it might get the press off their backs but I don't think the GOP will win on election day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeoutofjoint Donating Member (108 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
10. This is rude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. I think the republican candidates are rude.
They are like a big middle finger to all of America.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cjsmom44 Donating Member (496 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #10
24. RE: I AGREE
This is very uncalled for and rude....please....have some class
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Class? I think McCain is seriously ill and will die in the next 60 days
Sorry, but I think he's held together with duct tape and bubble gum.


He is unfit for office, both mentally and physically.

He's a broken 72 year OLD man.

He needs to be in a home, one of his seven plush palaces, or a retirment home, but not the White HOUSE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. It's not rude. The post raises a serious question.
Edited on Thu Sep-18-08 11:35 AM by Solomon
The fact that McCain picked Palin in his condition is rude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aristus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. In many monarchies, it is illegal and treasonous to speculate on the possible death of the ruler.
We are not a monarchy. We have freedom of speech.

It McSame doesn't want people speculating on the possibility of his death, he should take his wrinkly old ass out of the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cjsmom44 Donating Member (496 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. RE: Point well taken
Well put!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
29. Really? In what way is it rude?
McCain is an older man with a lengthy history of serious medical problems. It is not outside the realm of possibility that he suffers a major medical setback within the foreseeable future.

If you feel this has no bearing or impact on the governance of this nation, you are sorely mistaken.

He would not be fit to govern, although elected, as the ballots cannot be changed; he is the nominee of his party.

Palin would become president, by law, if Mcain is medically incapacitated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
15. Missouri led the way in this, they could run a dead or near dead man.
Edited on Thu Sep-18-08 11:00 AM by gordianot
Any attempt to stall stop the election would be a catastrophic constitutional crisis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
17. It's not difficult to grasp, but...

The Constitution delegates to the states the manner in which the states select their electors for the office of president and vice president.

The Constitution does not prescribe, beyond simple principles in right-to-vote cases, how each or any of the states is to conduct its elections, construct its ballots, and so forth.

The Constitution does not give a rat's ass about political parties, as the document itself was not written in contemplation of political parties.



Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors
, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.


...
The Congress may determine the Time of chusing the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same throughout the United States.
...

The Electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice-President and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate;

The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted;

The person having the greatest Number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice. And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them, before the fourth day of March next following, then the Vice-President shall act as President, as in the case of the death or other constitutional disability of the President.

The person having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President, shall be the Vice-President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed, and if no person have a majority, then from the two highest numbers on the list, the Senate shall choose the Vice-President; a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice. But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.


All kinds of weird-ass scenarios get cooked up over candidate impairment/replacement, and so forth.

However, it is each state which is responsible for the manner in which its electors are chosen. So who or what can be on a ballot, and when, is up to each state to decide on its own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. Right. In which case, if they so choose, some state EV casters could vote for Romney instead
If that is indeed whom the Republicans had selected and is in accordance with their state laws/constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Maybe some could if their state law permitted it, but...

I genuinely doubt that any R would garner 270 EV's across a patchwork of 50 different electoral jurisdictions.

It would, however, be the election lawyer full employment act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. No doubt.
It'd be a legal nightmare, frankly. If you thought 2000 was bad, wait til that scenario plays out (and it probably will someday, though hopefully not.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davepc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
20. Doesn't anybody read the Constitution anymore?
Edited on Thu Sep-18-08 11:17 AM by davepc

Article II

Section 1. The executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his office during the term of four years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same term, be elected, as follows:

THIS SECTION ADMENDED BY THE 12th ADMENDMENT (see below)Each state shall appoint, in such manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a number of electors, equal to the whole number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or person holding an office of trust or profit under the United States, shall be appointed an elector.

The electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot for two persons, of whom one at least shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves. And they shall make a list of all the persons voted for, and of the number of votes for each; which list they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate. The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates, and the votes shall then be counted. The person having the greatest number of votes shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of electors appointed; and if there be more than one who have such majority, and have an equal number of votes, then the House of Representatives shall immediately choose by ballot one of them for President; and if no person have a majority, then from the five highest on the list the said House shall in like manner choose the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by States, the representation from each state having one vote; A quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice. In every case, after the choice of the President, the person having the greatest number of votes of the electors shall be the Vice President. But if there should remain two or more who have equal votes, the Senate shall choose from them by ballot the Vice President.6


The Congress may determine the time of choosing the electors, and the day on which they shall give their votes; which day shall be the same throughout the United States.

No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.

In case of the removal of the President from office, or of his death, resignation, or inability to discharge the powers and duties of the said office, the same shall devolve on the Vice President, and the Congress may by law provide for the case of removal, death, resignation or inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what officer shall then act as President, and such officer shall act accordingly, until the disability be removed, or a President shall be elected.7

The President shall, at stated times, receive for his services, a compensation, which shall neither be increased nor diminished during the period for which he shall have been elected, and he shall not receive within that period any other emolument from the United States, or any of them.

Before he enter on the execution of his office, he shall take the following oath or affirmation: — "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."


Amendment 12
Presidential elections


The Electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice-President, and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate;--The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted;--The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice. * The person having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President, shall be the Vice-President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed, and if no person have a majority, then from the two highest numbers on the list, the Senate shall choose the Vice-President; a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice. But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.



http://www.ushistory.org/documents/constitution.htm


It's up to the states to figure out who their electors vote for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #20
30. "It's Just A Piece Of Paper" /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibraLiz1973 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
28. Wait. Why does it have to happen on my birthday?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. um, in that case: Happy Birthday from John McCain
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC