Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anchorage Daily News: Palin lost privilege when e-mails went to Todd

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-14-08 12:37 PM
Original message
Anchorage Daily News: Palin lost privilege when e-mails went to Todd
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=103&topic_id=384082&mesg_id=384082

Gov. Sarah Palin is using flimsy grounds for withholding potentially embarrassing e-mails from a political supporter-turned-critic.

Former Republican candidate Andree McLeod has appealed the governor's decision to withhold or redact some e-mails and other state records. She's seeking the records in a dispute about the Palin administration's recruiting and hiring decisions. KTUU has reported that some of the withheld e-mails have subject lines referring to Palin critics Andrew Halcro, Dan Fagan and Alaska Ear.

From here it looks like McLeod has a strong case. First, she argues that the governor's office waived executive privilege for any state e-mails sent to Todd Palin, Gov. Palin's husband.

With all due respect to the First Gentleman, he wasn't elected to anything and as far as we know, hasn't been appointed to anything. He's a private citizen. If he's on the e-mail list for state business, those e-mails become public information. The law protects some communications between government officials -- not communications between government officials and private citizens.

http://www.adn.com/opinion/story/525455.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-14-08 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is just what I said the first time I read the "privilege" story
Since she sent them to a "civilian" the first time, there's NO WAY she can claim privilege now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-14-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. WTF does a Governor get executive privilege for?
I can sorta see it for a President, for immediate national security concerns, but I fail to see why the Governor of Alaska should be able to keep any correspondence private in a legal situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stop Cornyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-14-08 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. My governor's a malignancy but at least he doesn't share official correspondence with a secessionist
Edited on Sun Sep-14-08 01:03 PM by Stop Cornyn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC