Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McCain covered up Cindy's drug use/theft, blocked DEA investigation of her charity

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:04 PM
Original message
McCain covered up Cindy's drug use/theft, blocked DEA investigation of her charity
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 12:05 PM by kpete
BREAKING: McCain covered up Cindy's drug use/theft, blocked DEA investigation of her charity

Matt Stoller is all over this:

A whistleblower is coming forth against John and Cindy McCain, and the picture he is painting is not a pretty one. You've probably heard about Cindy McCain stealing prescription drugs from her charity in the 1990s. Today, Tom Gosinski, her former employee and a close friend of the McCain's, came out on the record about the entire sordid episode. And it appears that McCain used his Senate staff and resources to cover up Cindy's drug use, and potentially to prevent the Drug Enforcement Agency from investigating his wife's theft of illegal prescription drugs.

more at:
http://www.openleft.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=8147
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is this the big story that was predicted would break by a couple of Duers yesterday?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ooooh! I'm giddy!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
screembloodymurder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Potentially.
That says it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. this story is old. I don't think it will make much difference
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. yep. Gosinski's journal entries were published in 1994. No soap then, none now.
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 12:23 PM by onenote
And this big scoop was repeated in Feb 2008. And, again, not a ripple.

http://www.taxidermy.net/forum/index.php?topic=66574.0
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. The obstruction part is not in that article.
that i could find.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. here
The McCain camp had organized the interviews to head off a more negative story that was pending publication in the alternative weekly Phoenix New Times. That piece centered on a former American Voluntary Medical Team employee who accused Cindy McCain in a lawsuit of ordering him to conceal "improper acts" and "misrepresent facts in a judicial proceeding."

The accuser was Tom Gosinski, whom the charity had fired in 1993. He had tipped the DEA to check out Cindy's organization. He filed the lawsuit as a warning shot. His real allegation was that Cindy McCain had fired him because he "knew too much" about her drug use.

The details were in a 212-page report from the Maricopa County Attorney's Office that was about to become public when McCain arranged the interviews.

Ironically, County Attorney Rick Romley entered the fray at the request of McCain lawyer John Dowd, who alleged that Gosinski was extorting the McCains by offering to settle the case for $250,000.

By asking Romley to investigate, Dowd helped to create a public record that otherwise would not have existed.

The invitation-only interviews were not exactly a suave PR move. By playing favorites with the disclosure of the news, McCain created hard feelings among the Valley journalists who were not invited. They aggressively chased the story.

McCain refused to talk to reporters who were not invited to Cindy's private interviews.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Aha!
Well, this is fair game. Hope it sticks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC