This is the letter I read in todays paper which made my blood boil.
http://rutlandherald.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080911/OPINION02/809110310/1037/OPINION02Here is my response:
I am a 60”s woman. I actually grew up in the 50’s when women had few options and were still considered second class citizens. I fought against the flagrant sexism one day at a time while raising a family and fighting the little battles for more rights. I have hoped for a woman president for years and have believed it would happen. I think Hillary would have made a great President. She is intelligent, experienced and fully capable.
I was able to cast my first vote for the first Catholic President of the United States of America -John Fitzgerald Kennedy. I did not vote for him because he was a Catholic. I voted for him because I believed he was a new voice in a sea of tired old ideas. I believed he had been raised to feel the mantle of service and was capable of leading. However, if I had used the fact that he was Catholic why not Tony Bennett - in the past we could have chosen Spencer Tracey or some Mayor from NJ who had been an altar boy.
I once read a book in which the author described women as “thinking with their ovaries”. I was deeply offended by that sexist portrait and felt the attitude towards women during his time was summed up in that one phrase but if a woman would vote for anyone just because she is a woman and vote against all that she says she believes in then I think the phrase applies.