Florida's 'no match, no vote' enforcement could be too much, too lateMike Thomas
September 11, 2008
Charlie Crist understood the bitterness felt by minorities after Florida's infamous 2000 election, when nearly 1 in 7 ballots cast by blacks for president was tossed. Crist moved to heal these wounds. He backed restoration of voting rights for felons and ensured there would be a paper trail left by every vote.
So I am baffled as to why his administration now will risk dragging Florida through another racially tinged voting controversy. This one concerns the verification of voter registrations.
It is not a bad idea. It is just that the timing --
only three weeks before the end of voter registration -- is all wrong.So here we go again, with Republican election officials making decisions that disproportionately will affect Democratic voters in a crucial election now rated as a tossup in the polls.Why is there a need to suddenly throw this in the works at the last minute?The verification law, commonly called "no match, no vote," first was approved by the Legislature in 2005.
It requires that applicants put an identifying number on voter-registration forms -- usually a drivers-license number or the last four digits of a Social Security number. That number then is checked against state or federal databases to confirm the person's identity.
It sounds simple enough. But that's not the case.
People write down numbers wrong. Government clerks write down wrong numbers. An applicant might write his name as Mike Thomas on the form, but the Department of Motor Vehicles has him listed as Michael R. Thomas. These glitches disproportionately affect minority applicants. Asian names can be confusing. Hispanics can use different surnames. Blacks often use nontraditional spellings.
Florida is only one of four states to pass a no-match, no-vote law, according to the Brennan Center for Justice at the New York University School of Law.
more...
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/orl-miket1108sep11,0,2240401.column