Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pit Bull Palin

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Paul Rogat Loeb Donating Member (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:57 AM
Original message
Pit Bull Palin
When Sarah Palin joked about herself and her fellow hockey moms as pit bulls with lipstick, she may have revealed more than she intended. She made it sound a compliment—portraying herself and her peers as ordinary mothers who look good but are tough, tenacious, and defend their family at any cost. But do we really want a potential President whose prime trait is an eagerness to bite your throat at any pretext? We already have that: Dick Cheney.

There’s a reason why pit bulls have been banned for their lethal belligerence from England, Norway and France, to Miami and Springfield Missouri. They attack indiscriminately, whether other dogs or children or an elderly Seattle-area woman two of them nearly killed this past week. There’s a reason you don’t say, “Great, a pit bull just moved in. How nice for our neighborhood.” Even people who want some protection usually pick other breeds, like German Shepherds, because they know pit bulls might turn on them.

Now some of us admire their tenacity, and that’s a virtue, but other dogs are also tenacious—you can pick them up by the sock or rag they’re playing with. But they aren’t loose cannons that just might maul your neighbor’s five-year-old. You don’t want pit bulls running your block, much less the United States. Pit bull presidencies don’t work for issues like terrorism, global warming, our declining economy. You can’t solve them by simply ripping your enemy’s leg off.

Pit bulls have their uses, as junkyard dogs, but most of us reject them for our home. We’ve seen all too much what a “my way or we’ll destroy you” approach has done to our country in the past eight years. The single-mindedness of a pit ball can be useful, but it can also be disastrous. The Cheney crew had this in their obsession with attacking Iraq, even as they were dismissing Clinton-era reports of the threats from Bin Laden. If they hadn’t been so focused on attacking their enemies, we might never have embarked on the disastrous Iraq war.

Yet Sarah Palin seems to relish the pit bull role, with an attack dog’s taste for blood. Her high school classmates called her Sarah Barracuda. She won her first race as mayorby bringing in the state Republican Party to a nonpartisan contest and focusing on guns, abortion and how she was a true Christian and the incumbent wasn’t in a race that normally focused on roads and sewers. She fired the Wassila librarian who resisted her suggestion that some books might have to be banned and the police chiefwho didn’t support her candidacy. She fired the head of the Alaska state patrol who wouldn’t fire her ex-brother-in-law. She sat laughing while a shock jock interviewer mocked one of her political opponents (a cancer survivor and fellow Republican) for her weight, and called the woman a “bitch” and a “cancer.” And then there’s the convention speech that catapulted her to superstardom. Not only did it repeatedly distort the truth, it embodied every character assassination scenario from the past 30 years—taking the polarizing politics of Richard Nixon, Spiro Agnew, George Wallace, Lee Atwater and Karl Rove, and dressing it up, with lipstick, in Palin’s charismatic package. She even attacked the very idea of citizens working for change when she mocked community organizers.

If we read the polls, Palin’s pit bull approach may well be working. Pit bull politicians can be great campaigners—especially when their prime goal is to bloody their targets whatever the cost to truth, U.S. politics and ultimately, to our country. But do we really want a pit bull as vice president?

We should already know, because we’ve had one for the past eight years. Palin is younger, more attractive, and a better shot. But she has a similar ruthlessness, bellicosity, and eagerness to destroy anyone who gets in her way. She’s similarly secretive and controlling beneath the disarming charm. Despite her image as the outsider reformer, she has her own ties to pay-to-play politics from serving as one of three directors for the political action committee (PAC) of corrupt Alaska Senator Ted Stephens, to fighting for the Bridge to Nowhere before it became politically untenable, to hiring a lobbyist (when Mayor of Wassila) who not only was a former Stephens Chief of Staff but also worked for now-convicted crooked Republican lobbyist Jack Abramoff. And she’s just as beholden to a hard political right that denies reality: from global warming to seeking to ban abortions for rape or incest victims.

Not every Republican embodies the pit bull ethic—I’ll be voting for a Republican Secretary of State who’s meticulously fair and has played by the rules even when he’s taken heat from his own party.

Likewise, many once respected John McCain across party lines for what we thought was a departure from the Karl Rove, Lee Atwater politics of personal destruction. We assumed he’d learned its cost after the Bush campaign defeated him in a South Carolina primary by doing push/polling phone calls about his role in the Keating S&L scandal and spreading rumors his having two illegitimate black children. He was the rare current Republican who spoke out against torture and condemned reckless tax giveaways for the rich. Now he’s disavowed all this and hired one of the prime architects of the Bush campaign’s South Carolina attacks on him to help prepare Palin’s now-fabled convention speech. His own speech was also full of repeated falsehoods. He even embraces the chorus of contempt toward Obama for daring to say that America is better of when we observe international rules like the prohibition on torture. And his encouragement of Palin’s distortions speaks worlds about his prizing politics over country.

Let's hope we finally reject the pit bull approach this time around, no matter how shiny the lipstick looks.


Paul Rogat Loeb is the author of The Impossible Will Take a Little While: A Citizen's Guide to Hope in a Time of Fear, named the #3 political book of 2004 by the History Channel and the American Book Association. His previous books include Soul of a Citizen: Living With Conviction in a Cynical Time. See http://paulloeb.org">www.paulloeb.org To receive his articles directly, email sympa@lists.onenw.org with the subject line: subscribe paulloeb-articles

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nice writing but I dont dig your pit bull hate,


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConsAreLiars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Agreed. Paul Loeb is a brilliant and compassionate writer, but even saints have a wart or two.
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 02:18 AM by ConsAreLiars
I would recommend his books to anyone who is struggling to find a way to become a better citizen and a better person. But this simple-minded stereotyping of a whole breed is just lame at best, and I hope Paul has the insight to reconsider this kind of black-white labeling and demonizing. It is the kind of thinking he usually argues against.

(edit typos)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 03:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. And I don't dig how he votes for pugs.
"I’ll be voting for a Republican Secretary of State" Member that Harris and Blackwell? And how bout that Virginee thang?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pete2069 Donating Member (301 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. There are thousands of People
which have been viciously attacked & killed by these dogs
, in which they have been breed for: attacking anything which
moved for protection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
951-Riverside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. k&r
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. But if she's a Pit Bull, why is she hiding?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Because she's not a pit bull. She's just a Pomeranian. All yap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happygoluckytoyou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
7. PITBULLS VS PALIN -----> THE DIFFERENCE REVEALED--->
1) there is a chance that i would vote for a PITBULL for VP of the united states
2) a pitbull does not resemble a pig with lipstick
3) pitbulls dont rape the wilderness for the fun of it
4) i could trust a pitbull
5) pitbulls don't care what i do in the privacy of my bedroom
6) pitbulls don't want to reinstate the draft and send my pups to die for her oil
7) pitbulls know that when you call them BITCH it is accurate
8) pitbulls have their pups in litters of 5-6...oops nevermind on that one
9) if you have sex, and you still have your nutz... it was a pitbull
10) pitbulls don't mark their teritory in such a nasty way
11) pitbulls pee standing up
12) pitbulls dont claim war is an act of god
13) pitbulls CAN be cute and fun without thinking what it can get for them
14) pitbulls dont fire people they dont agree with
15) pitbulls have a sense of humor

how many republicans does it take to screw in a lightbulb?
republicans dont screw in lightbulbs, they screw in highschool hockey rink locker rooms and airport mens' bathrooms
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bette Noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
8. Can we leave pit bulls out of this?
It's not the dogs' fault they've been badly bred and raised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tutankhamun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. The author obviously doesn't know any pit bulls.
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 01:13 PM by Tutankhamun
Pit bulls are good, loyal, very sweet dogs. They are one of the only breeds bred to be non-human aggressive.

The problem pit bulls have is that Michael Vick types train the unlucky ones to fight other dogs. But even these fighting dogs don't attack humans. There is a new reality show about the pit bulls rescued from Vick's farm. They all live on a big ranch style estate and they're very nice, non-aggressive dogs that interact very well with people.

Pit bulls have the same problem as Democrats: they are good hearted and genuinely like people, but the MSM doesn't make money broadcasting this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. I agree -- she revealed much more than intended
When you think about it, it's kind of sick to make a joke about yourself being a pit bull -- and in front of a national audience yet. Perhaps she did that because she recognized that stuff would come out eventually. This way she can make it seem like being a pit bull is a good thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC