Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CBS take on McCain's Obama Sex Education Ad: PURE SLEAZE

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 04:23 PM
Original message
CBS take on McCain's Obama Sex Education Ad: PURE SLEAZE
Edited on Wed Sep-10-08 04:33 PM by debbierlus
This is from a CBS Political Blogger:

(Political Animal) PURE SLEAZE.... Last night, Hilzoy tackled the substance of John McCain's latest TV ad -- the one that suggests Obama's support for giving sex-ed lessons to kindergartners -- and explained why it's breathtakingly wrong.

But stepping back, it's probably worth putting the ad, arguably the most offensive campaign commercial of the cycle, in the broader context, and consider what it tells us about John McCain.

Asked for a response to the ad, Obama campaign spokesperson Bill Burton issued a statement: "It is shameful and downright perverse for the McCain campaign to use a bill that was written to protect young children from sexual predators as a recycled and discredited political attack against a father of two young girls -- a position that his friend Mitt Romney also holds. Last week, John McCain told Time magazine he couldn't define what honor was. Now we know why."

That's clearly the appropriate tone, but Josh Marshall says what the Obama campaign is reluctant to articulate.


et's not be surprised. McCain is pure sleaze. Sound harsh? Sure. But any other interpretation of the man at this point amounts to willful obliviousness or an embrace of the fantasy that he somehow doesn't know what his campaign is doing in his name. This is the race he's decided to run.


The bottom line is straightforward enough: it takes a degree of courage to run an honorable campaign. It takes a degree to integrity to tell voters the truth, present a credible vision for the future, and ask for the nation's trust.

Cowardice is much easier.

There is a clear strategy emerging for the campaign's homestretch. The more the McCain campaign comes up with new disgusting attacks and blatant lies, the more the Obama campaign has to respond. To leave attacks unanswered, or obvious distortions unacknowledged, would be a mistake. At the same time, the more time the Obama campaign has to respond to McCain's sleaze, the less time Obama has for his own message.

In other words, if Obama responds to McCain's sleaze, McCain benefits. If Obama ignores it, McCain benefits.

Remember, McCain's own campaign manager conceded last week, "This election is not about the issues." And the only way to ensure it's not about the issues is to run nauseating ads like the one the McCain campaign unveiled yesterday afternoon.

I've long felt that the challenge of being a good political writer is knowing, or at least learning, how to express an emotional reaction without losing one's cool. It's tempting to let one's frustration out, writing in all-caps, and using every expletive that comes to mind -- maybe even making up some new ones -- in order to fully convey one's sense of disgust. But that, in some ways, is too easy. It's more difficult to convey the same sense of revulsion without flying off the handle.

So, I'll just say this: John McCain has no business leading the greatest nation on earth

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/09/10/politics/animal/main4433985.shtml

I think they finally went TOO FAR for even the Main Stream Media....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Page not found
has it been scrubbed or is it someplace else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Your link is broken. NT
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. Fix the link dOOd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wow. They took that one down fast. So glad I cut and pasted the article
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. Could you please fix the link to the story? Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. Here's the fixed link (also fixed in OP)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC